posted on Oct, 28 2010 @ 07:06 PM
I've thought of that to.
But just now, something in your post led me to another thought, and now I'm really creeped out!!!
If they ATE from the 'tree of life' (family tree, fruit of the womb) umm... cannibalism?!? Like, eating the newborn.
To make matters worse, as soon as I (regrettably) thought of this, I then thought of that saying I've heard many time referring to a child being
"the apple of her eye" --which frankly I never understood, because who the heck has apples in their eyes? I've always known it meant a sort of
adoration that an adult relative feels for a child, but now I do wonder how/why that phrase came into being!
Then when you factor in God telling Abraham to sacrifice... Isaac, I think? (until a lamb showed up and was slaughtered instead, of course.) Even so,
Abraham, dutiful servant, sadly trekked up the mountain to find that altar to slaughter his child. Sadly... resigned to it... not freaking out like
"You've got to be kidding, God!!! Kill my child on an altar?! (If I'm not mistaken, food offered to God on an altar was subsequently eaten by his
followers in a feast. So thank God for the poor lil lamb wandering along, huh?) Also, the whole 'drink my blood' and 'eat my flesh' ritual of
communion where the congregation partakes of the body of Christ (the fruit of Mary's womb-- that's the words in your OP that spawned this whole
thought-train!)
So back to this gross-I-hope-I'm-way-wrong line of thought... did God tell Adam and Eve to eat of all the plants, fruits, blah blah blah except that
from the Tree of Life. Let's face it, he did tell them to be fruitful and multiply. Can't exactly multiply if you're devouring your offspring.
(Later in the days of Abraham, the population having multiplied, God may have relented on his mandate of 'no cannibalism.' Or the fact that A & E
were cast out of the Garden of Eden might indicate God wrote them off and left them to their cannibalistic instincts.)
Disclaimer: I am in no way proud of this post!!! Icky-poo!