It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lights Over El Paso, TX October 15, 2010 (SOLVED/Identified - SkyDivers)

page: 34
187
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by scitpeks
reply to post by Project-Sign
 

I agree its probably skydivers but did you join ATS just to debunk?
I ask because I note thats all your posts have been since you joined.


Scitpeks.....


I agree its probably skydivers


Good man!


Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by 0ne10
 





Does it make sense now?


Not the same.



Come on.. that's pretty d*** close. That's just one video if you had a bunch of those fireworks and video taped them you could easily get the same results as the vid. Maybe with a different brand or camera or distance.
You people are so hardheaded.



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:47 AM
link   



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:47 AM
link   
reply to post by scitpeks
 


Nice cop out... avoid answering questions and giving reasons for your theories.

You are the cop out master.



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by 0ne10
 





Does it make sense now?


Not the same.



Come on.. that's pretty d*** close. That's just one video if you had a bunch of those fireworks and video taped them you could easily get the same results as the vid. Maybe with a different brand or camera or distance.
You people are so hardheaded.


Well then why dont you try it see and if matches the video?



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:49 AM
link   
Obviously, these were balloons, filled with swamp gas, released by North Korean submarines probably working for Haliburton. Then again... probably not. Main thing is to keep watching - see how many more oddities happen and how many more Chinese airport closures take place. Difficult to know what to believe, but the official stories coming from governments on anything have less credibility than predictions from a psychic on crack.



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by scitpeks
reply to post by Project-Sign
 


I agree its probably skydivers but did you join ATS just to debunk?
I ask because I note thats all your posts have been since you joined.


I think we need people to debunk and weed out the obvious fakes, fireworks, flares, and hoaxes. If or when someone sees something legit then it wont be so easily debunked. Being logical and skeptical is very important here. If you (i don't mean YOU you, just people) then you get sucked into believing everything and the site is filled with psycho babble. Like the fella that is saying not the same. In the words of Gob Bluth "COME ON!"



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:51 AM
link   
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
 


...because it doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at the video and see that only very small completely possible changes need to be made to make it look exactly the same. Those small changes would be so easy to make that it is pointless to even go through the trouble of doing it.
edit on 17-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by 0ne10
 





Does it make sense now?


Not the same.



Come on.. that's pretty d*** close. That's just one video if you had a bunch of those fireworks and video taped them you could easily get the same results as the vid. Maybe with a different brand or camera or distance.
You people are so hardheaded.


Well then why dont you try it see and if matches the video?


Huh? What do you mean? I don't need to it's clearly the same thing.
2nd verse.



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:53 AM
link   
reply to post by 0ne10
 



No technically you didn't read what I said... you only read what you thought I said. Then went off in a confused rant.


You accused me of selective reading and ignoring your posts.
Now you say I did read and answer but because my answers didn't agree with you I only didn't "technically" read it??

Man, you are way too funny for me...
You do know I'm not here just to agree with you right?
I have my own views and opinions regardless of how farfetched that may appear to you..

On top of that and the silliest part, is that I have agreed with your theory umptenth times yet you still insist on insults and arguments..Kinda flippy...



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:57 AM
link   
reply to post by Maybe...maybe not
 


lol, this site is so funny..
I have accepted the skydiver theory for 10 pages now.
My only concession was asking if the times could be linked between the OPs vid and the GK training..

For that I have been insulted and asked for proof..
This site is nuts I tell ya..



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 01:59 AM
link   
reply to post by scitpeks
 


Absolutely not. I believe in a lot of things the average person might not. But almost every thread I've seen since joining has been hysterical nonsense about easily explainable happenings. I'm a bit disappointed actually, I wanted to see videos and pictures that actually made me take a step back and wonder, but I've seen nothing of the kind so far. But the worst thing is how very few take a minute to actually think about what they're seeing, or asking 'could there be a logical explanation for this?' before jumping off the deep end and proclaiming it something out of the ordinary. Like I said before, and to answer your question, I'm not a debunker, just an advocate of using one's brain.



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 02:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by scitpeks
You accused me of selective reading and ignoring your posts.


Yes a few of your lasts posts you only commented on the last bit, and ignored the rest.


Originally posted by scitpeks
Now you say I did read and answer but because my answers didn't agree with you I only didn't "technically" read it??


Nope that is not what I said. I didn't say anything about you not agreeing with me so you didn't technically read it... I pretty much said (using different terminology) that you interpreted what I said incorrectly. So technically you didn't read what I said, you only read what you think I said... which means you interpreted what I said wrong.

Get it? Was it that hard to understand?

Again, the quote above proves you don't have very good comprehension skills.



Originally posted by scitpeks
Man, you are way too funny for me...


I think you are hilarious too.


Originally posted by scitpeks
You do know I'm not here just to agree with you right?


Show me where I said anything about you having to agree with me. Oh wait you can't....

You fail at interpretation.


Originally posted by scitpeks
I have my own views and opinions regardless of how farfetched that may appear to you..


Now you are ranting on about nothing... You made your own error, now you are ranting on because of that error.


Originally posted by scitpeks
On top of that and the silliest part, is that I have agreed with your theory umptenth times yet you still insist on insults and arguments..Kinda flippy...


You agreed they were sky divers.... great...

...and while I was talking to Agent_USA_Supporter, YOU ARGUED WITH ME about something I said..... This entire time, I have been replying to YOUR arguments....

One word... Hypocrisy



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 02:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Project-Sign
 


No problems, so check out this thread, see what you think..
www.abovetopsecret.com...

I look forward to seeing your opinion



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 02:05 AM
link   
reply to post by scitpeks
 


You are all sorts of wrong.

Nobody cared about you asking for times. In fact I was even trying to answer the same question.

You were insulted and ridiculed because you jumped into a conversation and started arguing with loopy logic.

I was talking about the video being black and white, and you jumped in claiming "burden of proof" blah blah blah... Then I talk about it being out of focus, and you jump in saying "prove it prove it" blah blah blah blah
Then I talk about the other event to prove the video was black and white and you claim "prove its the same event" blah blah blah...

Between you and I, I was the only one bringing anything forward, the only one providing more than just questions.

Then you start claiming to side with me, yet still continue to argue with me... talk about nonsense!!!!

edit on 17-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 02:06 AM
link   
reply to post by 0ne10
 



Again, the quote above proves you don't have very good comprehension skills.


I think thats about your tenth insult aimed at me.
Care to show where I have insulted you?
BTW, I have passed every mensa test so get off your high horse mate.
You are starting to really P me off with your insults.
No more Mr Nice Guy..Enough is enough...



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 02:07 AM
link   
reply to post by scitpeks
 


Scitpeks.....


For that I have been insulted and asked for proof..


Well.....

I didn't insult you.


Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 02:09 AM
link   
reply to post by Project-Sign
 


You and I are one and the same. I came here to find something extraordinary... but I have been disappointed because everything so far can be explained. I want to find something that can't be explained.

Ive only seen 3 UFO's, in person, which I can't explain. I want to see more... I haven't found it.



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 02:11 AM
link   
reply to post by scitpeks
 


It wasn't an insult. It was an observation. If you don't like the observation then change.

You wrongly interpreted my words multiple times, and didn't comprehend what I was saying. This means there is a comprehension conflict.

That is not an insult. It's a language barrier of some sort.
edit on 17-10-2010 by 0ne10 because: bad typo



posted on Oct, 17 2010 @ 02:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by Project-Sign
reply to post by scitpeks
 


Absolutely not. I believe in a lot of things the average person might not. But almost every thread I've seen since joining has been hysterical nonsense about easily explainable happenings. I'm a bit disappointed actually, I wanted to see videos and pictures that actually made me take a step back and wonder, but I've seen nothing of the kind so far. But the worst thing is how very few take a minute to actually think about what they're seeing, or asking 'could there be a logical explanation for this?' before jumping off the deep end and proclaiming it something out of the ordinary. Like I said before, and to answer your question, I'm not a debunker, just an advocate of using one's brain.


absolutely this........

thanks

rich



new topics

top topics



 
187
<< 31  32  33    35  36  37 >>

log in

join