Lights Over El Paso, TX October 15, 2010 (SOLVED/Identified - SkyDivers)

Originally posted by scitpeks
Mate, atleast I just question facts and dont make unfounded comments like you.

Question facts....

Originally posted by scitpeks
I have not once attacked you or even said you are talking nonsense.

...but you just said I am making unfounded comments.

Originally posted by scitpeks
Learn to debate instead of argue.

The debate was over long ago... we are no longer debating... we are arguing about the end of the debate.

Originally posted by scitpeks
Until then I will not reply to you..

Thank God... I've had enough of your loopy logic.

Originally posted by scitpeks
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND

 

point proven.....

thanks

rich

All you proved is that you like to argue over nothing..

still not answering my question then?. ok

i notice agent usa supporter has disappeared again, has a habit of doing that when he can't answer something.

reply to post by 0ne10

but you just said I am making unfounded comments.

Ummm, how many of your posts have been removed?
I think unfounded comments is correct.
I have agreed with the skydiver theory but you still wish to argue.That doesn't really make sense.
Now I have this Rich character asking me for proof of something..

I can't be bothered argueing over incidentals..

Hi there. I just signed up so I could post this link. It also shows 3 objects and then a 4th appearing however these objects are in space.www.youtube.com...

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
This is just awful, awful junk ufology.

Anyone with any experience at all can clearly see this is a parachute display within several seconds of the commencement of the video footage.

The massive amount of energy being expended on this would be far better spent on good quality material.

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe...not

Have these parachute guys came and to the media and said it was them and not the UFOs?

Anyone with any experience at all can clearly see this is a parachute display within several seconds of the commencement of the video footage.

Sorry i am not buying it because the thread op had 3 objects and had no sound of a plane and oh look u got stars for been a skeptic

Divided we fall eh? I wonder why it degenerates into bickering? Is it because everyone needs their point to be absolutely correct? To me ignorance is refusing to alter ones point of view. Can neither side give an inch? Is it a religious war of some sorts. Maybe it was the golden knights, just like it might have been balloons. I personally find it hard to believe that people can be so easily mistaken. There wasn't anyone there with an iPhone? Couldn't do a search? ...and yet, can I discount the fact that people get fooled all the time? I lost faith in the average human intelligence level when someone used lol in real life. I'm on the fence because both sides have some valid points. And I think we could all benefit from a little perspective...sit back, take a deep breath and remember that if it is aliens we'll all know soon enough.

Where are all the debunkers hiding tonight? Does this video intimidate? Don't worry, we won't mock you. Just come out and admit that this is basically unexplainable.

I'm sorry, but when they broke up into perfect circles and started criss crossing each other it sold it to me that this can't be flares. These were controlled objects.

Originally posted by etbrahhh
I'm sorry, but when they broke up into perfect circles and started criss crossing each other it sold it to me that this can't be flares. These were controlled objects.

Apparently debunkers can only explain them as parachuters attached to flares.

Originally posted by scitpeks
Ummm, how many of your posts have been removed?

Quite a few because I keep using words which describe how someone is acting, and those words were defined as insults in certain cultures.

It has nothing to do with unfounded comments.

Originally posted by scitpeks
I think unfounded comments is correct.

Prove it is correct. Don't think.

Originally posted by scitpeks
I have agreed with the skydiver theory but you still wish to argue.That doesn't really make sense.

Sir, I think you need to step away from the screen for a second and look at yourself arguing with me. I was having a conversation with Agent_USA_Supporter about the video being out of focus and black and white.... and YOU argued with me, using loopy logic, and you continue to argue with me till this very moment.

I showed you several reasons why I believe the camera is out of focus (because you can see the focus changing in the video), and gave you a reason to believe it is black and white (because there is no color, and another video of the event shows color) and you STILL have yet to show ANYTHING that supports your side of the argument. You keep using loopy logic and using the "burden of proof" cop out because you have NOTHING of any substance which supports what you were claiming...

Why do you continue to argue and not display any supporting information or logic?

Originally posted by scitpeks
Now I have this Rich character asking me for proof of something..

You keep asking us for proof.... so now you know how it feels.

Originally posted by scitpeks
I can't be bothered argueing over incidentals..

I can't either, yet some reason I still find the courage to reply to you.

Originally posted by etbrahhh
I'm sorry, but when they broke up into perfect circles and started criss crossing each other it sold it to me that this can't be flares. These were controlled objects.

the eyewitness of the video have stated and the eyewitness have also stated that a pyramid first came down then the 3 objects started to break from it.

reply to post by obzerv


Being able to explain something is much harder than not being able to explain anything at all.

reply to post by 0ne10

Why do you continue to argue and not display any supporting information or logic?

I have not put forward a theory so what proof would you expect me to show?
Talk about loopy logic

Now if you can just show me where the OP's Vid and the Golden Knight's training jump occured at the same time I will be on my way..
Thats ALL I have asked..Not much really...

Originally posted by obzerv

Originally posted by etbrahhh
I'm sorry, but when they broke up into perfect circles and started criss crossing each other it sold it to me that this can't be flares. These were controlled objects.

Apparently debunkers can only explain them as parachuters attached to flares.

I wonder how much looking into the sky at certain angles affects our perspective on these kind of things. If it were parachuters with flares on them, how do explain them criss crossing like that? The distance between them was massive.

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
the eyewitness of the video have stated and the eyewitness have also stated that a pyramid first came down then the 3 objects started to break from it.

Please back up this comment with a quote. Prove what you said is correct.

I don't recall anyone saying a pyramid first came down then the 3 objects broke from it. Please do show us who said that. Quote it.

Originally posted by scitpeks
reply to post by W3RLIED2

 

Fair enough and as I posted earlier, I have request to join their facebook page.
Once in I will ask them directly when they trained etc..
Get it from the horse's mouth

Uh I hope not... Facebook should be just for saying hi and stuff
not learning US Gov Secrets about training according to
the US-RTFM-101 Section IIV: Chapter 37 and I do not directly quote
1. Any one who is a member of the U.S.Military after "war" special programs ranging from
football to band including ping pong, horseshoe, track, SKYDIVING, or any other activity
with any military name accompanying it may not discus any training to any non military
personnel unless officially notified buy a commanding officer.
2.A. Any personnel that is asked about any of the activities must answer in the manor of the code
listed in US-RTFM-129 Sec.XII Chp 67.7 "the bleep"
ex: Q. To answer your question what time do you train?
A. Well we bleep at bleep for bleep or until bleep. Then bleep four more bleep.
B.Any personnel caught doing this will be treated like a "Benedict Arnold " and be barred from
all activities, and/or include a tar and feather session followed by a court marshal and/or imprisonment.
C. If you are filmed doing your mission in after war activities and are still confronted about it
read US-RTFM-117 on the use of slim memory-thingy-ma-jig

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Mr. D

 

My work is pretty much done.
It was the Golden Knights.

Well there shot my idea of it being
a group of fairly large pixies that crossed a few dimensions to
bring skittles to all the kids of the world. well at least
that's what the subtitles in my head told me.

reply to post by jorgy72


your link does not work,,... well it will not load for me anyhow, but if they are in space then they will turn into space junk, ice particles etc. even if they are observed to make the exact same movements and are identical in appearance to the O.P.'S video, it's called making the observed incident fit your beliefs.

if they are in earths atmosphere then they are, lanterns, planes, skydivers, weather balloons, flares etc etc, if in space the exact same thing turns into, space junk, ice particles, or space dust close to the camera, its magic.

Originally posted by scitpeks
I have not put forward a theory so what proof would you expect me to show?
Talk about loopy logic

You put forth the theory that the video was in color. You put forth the theory that the video was correctly focused. And you put forth the theory that the second video was not the same event. I would like you to show some type of supporting evidence for these theories.

I put forth my evidence and reasons for my theories, where are yours?

You keep failing to provide anything.. all you do is question but never answer. It's a cop out.

Originally posted by scitpeks
Now if you can just show me where the OP's Vid and the Golden Knight's training jump occured at the same time I will be on my way..
Thats ALL I have asked..Not much really...

That is not all you have asked....

...you will get your answer soon enough thanks to the researching skills of many here.