Lights Over El Paso, TX October 15, 2010 (SOLVED/Identified - SkyDivers)

Originally posted by 0ne10
reply to post by scitpeks

 

Ok I will prove you wrong...

Here is the same event from a different camera...

Do you see color? The same colors as the Golden Knights?

Why is the OP's video not in color? Why is it black and white?

There is your proof....

The thread OP video date is on 16 not the 15th

the Golden Knights had the airshow on the 15th.

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


Then there is the fact that the sighting was filmed to the North East of El Paso, watch the video again to verify this.

Have a guess where the Golden Knights were practicing? Which airfield were they landing on?

Biggs Army Airfield.

Have a guess where that is!

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8989c2af86e7.png[/atsimg]

Crikey!

What evidence to YOU have to prove this wasn't the Golden Knights?

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter

The OP news story is talking about Friday night.
The airshow is (was) today and tomorrow.
The jump on Friday night was a practice jump.
www.amigoairsho.org...

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


WRONG... watch the OP's video again at 0:40:



Let me quote the video:

"Eventually a fourth light can be seen"

Wrong yet again..



Oh great you edited your post thinking I wouldn't notice. Don't try to hide your errors.

reply to post by 0ne10


I cant tell if that vid is the same event. It doesn't show one object splitting into three as in the OPs vid..
There's no way to prove its the same event..

Originally posted by scitpeks
reply to post by 0ne10

 

I cant tell if that vid is the same event. It doesn't show one object splitting into three as in the OPs vid..
There's no way to prove its the same event..

prove it wasn't....

reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND

prove it wasn't....

Hmm, prove a negative??
But I always assumed the burden of proof lies with the person making the assumption.
Am I wrong?

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter

 

Then there is the fact that the sighting was filmed to the North East of El Paso, watch the video again to verify this.

Have a guess where the Golden Knights were practicing? Which airfield were they landing on?

Biggs Army Airfield.

Have a guess where that is!

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8989c2af86e7.png[/atsimg]

Crikey!

What evidence to YOU have to prove this wasn't the Golden Knights?

Or the article written by Alex Hinojosa of the El Paso times who went up in the plane with the Golden Knights on Friday night (the 15th) to do a story?

the eye wittiness accounts

SORRY; my son just told me he saw the lights as he was going to work at Lamplighters in E. EP. He thought they were flares from Fort Bliss as the Amigo Airshow is almost here and the jets are practicing with low flights over the city and suburbs. As far as their flying at night I do not know.

We didn't hear the plane in the first and second video right? not to mention we didnt see even the lights of the plane above them, and dont tell me the plane is stealth.

reply to post by scitpeks


Wow you are so predictable... I knew you would say that...

After many debate non stop saying its the same event, same area, same day, looks the same... you go ahead and say it's not right when it could be used to prove you wrong..

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Mr. D

 

My work is pretty much done.
It was the Golden Knights.

I have to agree with One10 & Phage that the Golden Knights are, given our limited data and poor video, the most logical explanation. Even in the El Paso video when the lights separated and appeared to hover the poor video still showed the tails in certain areas.

I would love this to be a new step in bring to the surface the UFO topic, but we need to move on as this video proves nothing and is exactly the type of data when educated people must use Occam's razor.

The local evening news nation wide has become more and more tabloid like in search of advertising dollars.

The station's "Professional Cameraperson" and I want to use the word professional very lightly, made no attempt to adjust the very obvious focus issue, leaving a mysterious video that was probably perfect to use in advertising spots leading to the actual news program.

Even though I heartily disagreed with One10's posting tactics during to NYC event/non-event, anyone who wants to debate him/her needs to wait for much much better data from a future video and/or physical evidence.

Thank you to all who did the research finding the Golden Knights.

Regards,

t

Originally posted by scitpeks
reply to post by 0ne10

 

I cant tell if that vid is the same event. It doesn't show one object splitting into three as in the OPs vid..
There's no way to prove its the same event..

agreed

but the disinfo agents here on ATS dont care, as long they get people to agree with them, that they weren't UFOs
people like rich,one and others.

reply to post by scitpeks


You are making the assumption that it is not the same event, after others already claimed it was.

So prove that it's not the same event.

reply to post by 0ne10


Mate, where are you coming from?
Your vid doesn't show one object splitting into three, fact??
I said 5 pages ago that the GK display is the best explanation.
I'd just like to tie down the timeframe with the OPs vid V's the GK training..

Originally posted by scitpeks
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND

 

prove it wasn't....

Hmm, prove a negative??
But I always assumed the burden of proof lies with the person making the assumption.
Am I wrong?

ok, if thats how you want to play, you tell us what it is and prove you are correct....

thanks

rich

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter

Originally posted by scitpeks
reply to post by 0ne10

 

I cant tell if that vid is the same event. It doesn't show one object splitting into three as in the OPs vid..
There's no way to prove its the same event..

agreed

but the disinfo agents here on ATS dont care, as long they get people to agree with them, that they weren't UFOs
people like rich,one and others.

oh im a disinfo agent, thats the usual response of someone that can offer nothing.

and seeing as you are always asking everyone to prove things, i now ask you to PROVE IM A DISINFO AGENT??!

i'll even welcome you to my home to prove it....

thanks

rich

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


So let's summarize shall we?

There are several videos showing three, then four lights floating in the sky, these videos were taken on Friday night the 15th October 2010 in El Paso.

There is an air show on this weekend in El Paso, one of the featured performers is a group called the Golden Knights.

There is an article written by lex Hinojosa of the El Paso times who went up with the Golden Knights on Friday night the 16th October 2010 during a practice flight.

The sightings were said to occur to the North East of El Paso.

The field that the Golden Knights were landing on during this practice flight is Biggs Army Airfield as quoted in the article written by lex Hinojosa.

This field is located to the North East of El Paso as per the google earth screen grab I provided:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/8989c2af86e7.png[/atsimg]

Then there are other videos of the Golden Knights performing the same sort of maneuvers as seen in the OP's video.

This is my case for the lights being the Golden Knights. You may call it disinfo if you like but these are the facts. I await your proof of these being something otherwise.

Thanks.

reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND

ok, if thats how you want to play, you tell us what it is and prove you are correct....

Thats not how the game works.
Those that choose to put forward a theory as to what it is need to supply the proof.
I have stated many times (and getting sick of it) that the GK display is the best explanation.
Until someone ties down the times of the GK event and the OPs vid then its still open.
I can't be any clearer than that..

Originally posted by scitpeks
reply to post by RICH-ENGLAND

 

ok, if thats how you want to play, you tell us what it is and prove you are correct....

Thats not how the game works.
Those that choose to put forward a theory as to what it is need to supply the proof.
I have stated many times (and getting sick of it) that the GK display is the best explanation.
Until someone ties down the times of the GK event and the OPs vid then its still open.
I can't be any clearer than that..

it never is is it?. now prove that it wasn't the same event?.

thanks

rich

reply to post by Aggie Man


OK.

I usually blast this stuff like clay pigeons.

Cant do it here.

Still curious about manhatten but not giving green light to it.

I'll actually sandf this with reservations....just dont know what the reservations are yet..

One attempt to debunk...

THE ZETAS HAVE UFO TECHNOLOGY!!!!!

Originally posted by bigbomb456
reply to post by 0ne10

 

Flying a kite is a far cry from jumping out of an airplane with flares attached to your feet over a populated city and next an international airport. You still have not addressed my video:

It's a shame that they didn't continue filming the complete descent. If they had, I think it would have given us something more accurate to study. I'm still not fully convinced of what this is. The formation is so similar to that in the NYC video, for me to just say.... oh it's balloons, or....oh it's just sky divers. Case is not closed, as far as I am concerned. It will be interesting to see if the golden knights replies thanks to all for the evidence you have presented here. I'm still reading through lol