the LHC, solar flares and 2012, this is how they are linked and why!

reply to post by Ben81


So 2012 is a hoax right. That's a photoshop job and that means hoax. Thanks for making it so clear. Isn't it simpler to write Hoax

The LHC looks like a stargate from the hollywood movie

Obama's bloodline may be egyptian

and there are obelisks all over TPTB's territory....

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Why do TPTB want to be ancient egyptians so bad??

reply to post by rajaten


The LHC does not look like a Hollywood movie. It is far more interesting than a movie mock up.

None of things you list suggests that anyone is trying to be an ancient Egyptian.

Have you considered learning about ancient Egypt. It might help you understand why this claim is a little on the ludicrous side of things.

reply to post by stereologist


he is right...we are appraoching the time of pharaoh..SETs followers will try to claim soverignty...though the only person who has divine right to rule..is Pharaoh...Osiris`s Pharaoh...not SETs.

anyway...the gnostics dont think its a hoax...its ther religon...read up on gnostics.

personally i think 2012 is a lame fabricated story ....and certain people are making it happen...

also about the lhc....its an experiment....deliberatly built for the comming period...that they think is now significant enough to take precautions..and to expect something!
convenient its ready in 2010 and will be shut downin 2012??? cmon are you not the slightest bit interested?

Here is what I stated.

Your claim is unfounded nonsense.You have no evidence for any of these claims. It is just nonsense. Your claims of what the LHC can be used for are also unfounded fiction. Your claims of Hindus and Gnostics is just a fabrication of no merit. That makes these claims the same as the rest of the 2012 claims - a hoax.

You have no evidence that any gnostic group or Hindus or any other religious group is involved in the development of the LHC. It's a silly claim with no supplied basis.

Repeating that tall tale makes it no more true. In fact, we know that is a lie since the LHC is a CERN project.

LHC is not an experiment. It is a tool developed to perform experiments. It was not built for any particular time period. These are just delusional comments from someone with the wacko claim of being a pharaoh.

Your statements amount to nothing more at this point than gibberish. Nothing you claim is connected to reality. It's just like your claim to being pharaoh. It's just made up.

reply to post by rajaten


The LHC looks like a very large circular tube. Explain to me how that looks like a Stargate. The pictures you are referring to were taken before construction was completed. Here is what it looks like today.



As for the obelisks, they were constructed much for the same reason Napoleon had the Arc de Triomphe constructed. They represent power. The Romans had Triumphal Arches in all of their major cities, as well as obelisks once they conquered Egypt. These are not hidden symbols, they are simply conveying the same messages they conveyed thousands of years ago, "We are a powerful nation."

reply to post by stereologist


u bore me..

who do you think invested in CERN...

i think you have no idea on the gnostics...you dont even seem to be bothered to quickly check...

the lhc,as a whole, is an experiment...

these are not claims...if i said the sky is blue would you call that a claim...??

Please provide any evidence you have for these now farcical claims.

Don't pretend by asking who I think invested in the equipment to do experiments. Tell us. Go ahead show us the evidence.

These are claims. Maybe English is a second language for you. Here is what a claim is:

From Claim from Yahoo! education

To state to be true, especially when open to question

So you say these are true, but you have shown no evidence for this. That is what you have done this entire thread. Here are more claims:

1. You are a pharaoh - I say that's laughable
   
2. You got an A in physics - My opinion is I don't believe you
   
3. The LHC makes worm holes - Any evidence a worm hole has ever been made anywhere?
   
4. The sun's magnetic field affects the LHC - Any evidence that you can detect the field inside the Earth?
   
5. Gnostics and Hindus heavily invested in the LHC - Again no evidence, just posturing
   

The only thing you have tried to support is your contention that the ancient Egyptians had electric lights. You did this by misrepresenting a single panel in a single temple. You referenced hoax sites as well.

Why don't you make the same effort to support your gnostic point or do you already know that you can't find anything to support this tale of yours?

The LHC is a device. It is not an experiment. A telescope is a device. It can be used for experiments. A microscope is a device. It can be used for experiments. The LHC is already being used in experiments. It will continue to be used for experiments.

reply to post by theAymen


Your claims about the construction of the LHC are completely unfounded. CERN is funded by its member countries. This is one of the reasons why the LHC was two years behind schedule. The cost ended up being more tan originally estimated, so more time was needed to receive the necessary funding from the member countries. So, unless everyone living in the 20 Western European countries that contribute to CERN's budget are Gnostic or Hindu, your claims are way off.

Originally posted by stereologist

wow..have you been assigned this thread..tutut

These are claims. Maybe English is a second language for you. Here is what a claim is:

haha..born n raised in london....

You are a pharaoh - I say that's laughable

I AM PHARAOH...if you think not, show me pharaoh...whether im pharaoh to you or not is not the point..my blood is.

You got an A in physics - My opinion is I don't believe you

yes i did... the electrolysis experiment CAN be done with magnets, + & -...thats the point on having two different metals..ones positive ones negative....lesson 101.

The LHC makes worm holes - Any evidence a worm hole has ever been made anywhere?

but it is the only machine, concievable, that CAN produce one...tut tut

The sun's magnetic field affects the LHC - Any evidence that you can detect the field inside the Earth?

?? you think we cant feel E&Ms on earth...or FTEs do not effect us lolol...go learn

Gnostics and Hindus heavily invested in the LHC - Again no evidence, just posturing

i said that for controversy..still ,,,gnostics spread this theory
the truth about cern is that here are no "backers" who have "invested" in CERN. CERN is a international research lab backed entirely by governments. Also there is no way to "get [your] money back" from CERN. CERN is a non-profit body....but, it the biggest and most costly science experiment ever, costing $10 billion...wtf, thats taxpayers money !!..on what grounds did they think it was a good investment...what sort of sales pitch would you have to hear yourself to invest?

The only thing you have tried to support is your contention that the ancient Egyptians had electric lights. You did this by misrepresenting a single panel in a single temple. You referenced hoax sites as well.

??? my sites were referenced for the images not for the text..AS I STATED.
there is more than one image of light bulbs if you care to look...also tell me your theory on how the alexandria light house worked.

Why don't you make the same effort to support your gnostic point or do you already know that you can't find anything to support this tale of yours?

ahaha..its their religon that sprouted and supported the modern mayan myth...honestly read up on gnostics and what they believe...then look at WHO is a gnostic....dont comment untill youv read it.

i wont quote or provide a link as you get very abusive..and they are not my quotes

The LHC is a device. It is not an experiment. A telescope is a device. It can be used for experiments. A microscope is a device. It can be used for experiments. The LHC is already being used in experiments. It will continue to be used for experiments.

tutut...GETTING IT TO WORK..WAS IN FACT AN EXPERIMENT... THE CONCEPT OF LEARNING ANYTHING FROM SMASHING PARTICLES...IS AN EXPERIMENT ...

reply to post by theAymen

but it is the only machine, concievable, that CAN produce one...tut tut

We haven't even proven the existence of wormholes, let alone how they would be produced so how can you claim that the LHC is the only machine capable of producing them? The LHC doesn't do anything that doesn't already happen on a regular basis naturally. So, if the LHC is capable of producing wormholes, why aren't they produced on a regular basis as millions of particles collide around us every second?

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by theAymen

 

but it is the only machine, concievable, that CAN produce one...tut tut

We haven't even proven the existence of wormholes, let alone how they would be produced so how can you claim that the LHC is the only machine capable of producing them? The LHC doesn't do anything that doesn't already happen on a regular basis naturally. So, if the LHC is capable of producing wormholes, why aren't they produced on a regular basis as millions of particles collide around us every second?

firstly they say that it can create micro black holes...!!!

secoundly...this was enough to take them to court:read

"The case before the European Court of Human Rights," said Dr James Gillies, chief spokesman for CERN, commenting on the Court case in the Telegraph, "contains the same arguments that we have seen before and we have answered these in extensive safety reports."

All 12 points in the LHC Kritiks arguments are being considered by the ECHR. Other safety hazards have been studied in the latest CERN LHC Safety Assessment Group report, including other theoretical objects and dangers that might be produced at the LHC like micro black holes. MBH is the main focus in the Court suit. CERN concludes there is no risk.

the only evidence saying its safe... comes from cern !!

reply to post by theAymen


I was giving you the benefit of the doubt with respect to English due to your frequent mistakes. That's settled then, you should know how to look up words and use them properly. So do it.

I AM PHARAOH

I don't believe you. That is my opinion.

the electrolysis experiment CAN be done with magnets

Once again you show an utter lack of understanding of electrolysis. You don't understand the difference between magnetism and electricity. I don't believe you received any grade better than an F. It is more likely that you never even took a class in physics. My opinion is you are not telling the truth.

you think we cant feel E&Ms on earth...or FTEs do not effect us lolol...go learn

Again, a pathetic attempt at a straw man argument. Please show us anywhere the sun's magnetic field can be detected underground. That's the issue. The issue is related to the LHC and the sun's magnetic field. It's an issue you claim to be important.

i said that for controversy

So at least on this point you admit telling a lie.

It also seems that you admit there is no evidence for electric lights in ancient Egypt.

i wont quote or provide a link as you get very abusive..and they are not my quotes

You have not made any attempt except for ancient electric bulbs in Egypt to support any position. Now you say you won't. I believe that should read "I can't." That's the truth isn't it? You admit in a few places of telling lies. Actually, this thread is basically a collection of unfounded, uncorroborated musings on your part. You could improve your statements by checking first to make sure that things are correct before posting blatant mistakes.

Screaming does not make your position any better. In fact it looks like desperation on your part.

GETTING IT TO WORK..WAS IN FACT AN EXPERIMENT

Here you admit that the device is separate from the experiment.

THE CONCEPT OF LEARNING ANYTHING FROM SMASHING PARTICLES...IS AN EXPERIMENT

And here again you admit that the device is separate from the experiment.

Despite your upbringing in an English speaking country we are making important advances in your understanding of English. We have gone over claim and the difference between the experiment and the devices used in the experiment.

Here's something else that can help you out. The + and - in electrolysis do not refer to magnetism. It's not an electric issue, not magnetic.

Originally posted by theAymen

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
We haven't even proven the existence of wormholes, let alone how they would be produced so how can you claim that the LHC is the only machine capable of producing them? The LHC doesn't do anything that doesn't already happen on a regular basis naturally. So, if the LHC is capable of producing wormholes, why aren't they produced on a regular basis as millions of particles collide around us every second?

firstly they say that it can create micro black holes...!!!

Wormholes are not microscopic Black Holes! If they were, they wouldn't have different names attributed to them.

IRM

reply to post by theAymen


Going to court is easy. Someone files a suit. Doesn't have to be truth to be filed. You just claim you filed it in good faith. Going to court is meaningless.

firstly they say that it can create micro black holes...!!!

Now who said that, the pumpkin heads that filed suit?

the only evidence saying its safe... comes from cern !!

And how do you know that?

reply to post by theAymen


Actually CERN has had a number of independently affiliated scientists who have come and checked out the LHC. Everyone of them has come back saying that there is no risk whatsoever.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by theAymen

 

I AM PHARAOH
I don't believe you. That is my opinion.

Treason.....

the electrolysis experiment CAN be done with magnets
Once again you show an utter lack of understanding of electrolysis. You don't understand the difference between magnetism and electricity.

owwww electromagnetics....one of the strongest forces known.

you think we cant feel E&Ms on earth...or FTEs do not effect us lolol...go learn
Again, a pathetic attempt at a straw man argument. Please show us anywhere the sun's magnetic field can be detected underground. That's the issue. The issue is related to the LHC and the sun's magnetic field. It's an issue you claim to be important.

The earth as a whole is effected by the sun...done to its core.....maybe its an experiment to see the atmospheric constants changing ?? dunno

i said that for controversy

So at least on this point you admit telling a lie.

It also seems that you admit there is no evidence for electric lights in ancient Egypt.

wow...yes there is...electricity was not hard to generate...expalain to me then how they lit up all there temples ant tombs which are mostly underground....if all it took was water...apparently the pyramids have hydrolic pumps underneath ??
aso there is more than one picture which illustrates this

..understand...building a pyramid is like you building a skyscrapor in the medievel days...it takes a certain level of understanding..

i wont quote or provide a link as you get very abusive..and they are not my quotes

You have not made any attempt except for ancient electric bulbs in Egypt to support any position. Now you say you won't. I believe that should read "I can't." That's the truth isn't it? You admit in a few places of telling lies.

in a few places???? wow your lame...it was once and i told you...move on

Screaming does not make your position any better. In fact it looks like desperation on your part.

no..sometimes you need to scream for the hard of hearing

GETTING IT TO WORK..WAS IN FACT AN EXPERIMENT
Here you admit that the device is separate from the experiment.

THE CONCEPT OF LEARNING ANYTHING FROM SMASHING PARTICLES...IS AN EXPERIMENT
And here again you admit that the device is separate from the experiment.

sheesh you said that they dont think a wormhole can be generated...im showing that they actualluy dont know anything...which is the point of the experiment

Despite your upbringing in an English speaking country we are making important advances in your understanding of English. We have gone over claim and the difference between the experiment and the devices used in the experiment.

we are making important advances in english... WTF..that was lame...now your attacking my english....tutut.. its better than yours....just shows your desperation to debunk...makes me think this thoery holds more water than i thought.

to add we are also making important advances in science

look...LHC BUILT IN TIME FOR EXPECTED SOLAR PHENOMENOM....now go eat an apple

Here's something else that can help you out. The + and - in electrolysis do not refer to magnetism. It's not an electric issue, not magnetic.

once again electromagnetics

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by theAymen

 

Actually CERN has had a number of independently affiliated scientists who have come and checked out the LHC. Everyone of them has come back saying that there is no risk whatsoever.

well lets go back to sleep then!

i hope your in the jury if i was taken court .....tutut

reply to post by theAymen


So, when I prove you wrong you fall back to the classic conspiracy theorist ground of, "Well, they must not be telling the truth then." We have had physicists from all around the world saying that there is absolutely no threat whatsoever. I would take their word on this matter over some person on a blog who has no relevant credentials whatsoever. You made a false statement, you should be able to admit that.

reply to post by Xcalibur254


credentials....its not about credentials...its about biasness...if you visit lhc...they bend over backwards to prove its safe...
only vetted scientists visited it...vetted.

cool u think its safe and they are colliding atoms for fun.