the LHC, solar flares and 2012, this is how they are linked and why!

reply to post by theAymen


So now you are tacitly admitting you do not know the difference between magnetism and electricity. That's okay. You can learn.

The earth as a whole is effected by the sun...done to its core.....maybe its an experiment to see the atmospheric constants changing ??

See why I was thinking ESL?
This has nothing to do with the detection of the sun's magnetic field within the Earth. The LHC is inside of the Earth. It is not on or near the surface. You claimed these items in the OP.

For this you need to grasp that the sun has poles(+-), and has major electromagnetic implications on matter and spacetime in our solar system as we know it.

Now.....a time/dimension flux, on earth, CAN be generated...in one way ...by the sun.....through the magnetic field of a solar flare.
To open the L. Hadron Collider`s generated doorway during the major solar flares of 2012 has MANY implications.

Thus you have suggested that the sun's magnetic field or a solar flare's magnetic field can affect the LHC. That's poppycock. Show us the evidence.

Link to indicate depth of LHC.
Lage Hadron Collider

Next, please quote me instead of plagiarizing my post.

expalain to me then how they lit up all there temples ant tombs which are mostly underground....if all it took was water...apparently the pyramids have hydrolic pumps underneath ??
aso there is more than one picture which illustrates this

1. Attempting to deflect the argument isn't going to work with me. You made a claim and you have no evidence for it.
   
2. Suggesting pumps under the pyramids now? Show us.
   
3. More than something besides the Dendara panel? That's the panel you purposely misrepresented.
   

reply to post by theAymen


Then where are all of the non-vetted scientists that are claiming the LHC is dangerous? The principles of it are pretty basic for any nuclear physicist, so they should be able to identify dangers without visiting it. It's funny. The same bogus claims were made when the RHIC was opened as well, and yet nothing happened. The simple fact is, all the LHC is doing is recreating the same collisions that happen on a daily basis. So, why would these collisions created under laboratory conditions be dangerous, but these same kinds of collisions that are happening around you right now are perfectly safe?

Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by theAymen

 

Then where are all of the non-vetted scientists that are claiming the LHC is dangerous? The principles of it are pretty basic for any nuclear physicist, so they should be able to identify dangers without visiting it. It's funny. The same bogus claims were made when the RHIC was opened as well, and yet nothing happened. The simple fact is, all the LHC is doing is recreating the same collisions that happen on a daily basis. So, why would these collisions created under laboratory conditions be dangerous, but these same kinds of collisions that are happening around you right now are perfectly safe?

tut tut...nooo...these reactions are not happening around me everyday..nowhere in our suns galaxy is this taking place....sheesh at the lame lies

reply to post by theAymen


I suggest you look into cosmic rays. Everyday these particles are hurtling through space towards Earth. When they reach our atmosphere they collide with other particles in the same way particles collide in the LHC. Furthermore, these collisions often produce millions of times more energy than the collisions in the LHC. The purpose for building particle colliders is so we actually study these collisions since we control the when and where.

reply to post by theAymen

tut tut...nooo...these reactions are not happening around me everyday..nowhere in our suns galaxy is this taking place....sheesh at the lame lies

More proof that you lied about taking a physics class, let alone got an A.

Actually these events happening around you are much more energetic than the LHC. The LHC reaches 7 TeV in collisions, potentially 14TeV.

Cosmic rays can have energies of over 1020 eV, far higher than the 10^12 to 10^13 eV that man-made particle accelerators can produce.

Cosmic Rays

Had you actually read any of the material about the claims of the LHC in that lawsuit, you'd already know about this. Obviously, you never read anything about the lawsuits.

reply to post by theAymen


I tried to find this water pump theory by searching some academic journals and turned up nothing. Then when I did a normal Google search, one of the first sites that came up was Pravda, a site well known for posting many, many false stories.

reply to post by Xcalibur254


it was a theory to explain the underground structures in the pyramids...which the offiical answer is "tunnels which are unfinshed!"...a french scientist made a working model using the blueprints.

i will find you a good link

Originally posted by stereologist

FTEs can make our magnetic field on earth...im going to choose a word...denser
Wrong again.

i clearly showed you that a fluxuation will take plase...describe the effects as you wish

You are the one making the silly statements. It is your obligation to support those statements. BTW, I've been inside of the pyramids and there are no wells there. I've heard this dim witted claim before.

haaaaaaaaaahahaha..iv been inside the pyraimds lolohaha
look below i`l show you what i mean...tutut..

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b37e4fe564a5.jpg[/atsimg]

the subterranean chamber you see there at the bottom in the BASEMENT was known..officially as a "bottomless pit"!
a more sane person said it was a well that had a water pump attached.
i dont know the name of him but he was french..and he built a working model.

iv been inside

there are many of isis holding lamps/torches...many of hathor reprented as a lamp....
and the alexandria lighthouse
So you have no evidence, just vacuous claims. I already knew that.

...how many images do you need..?? heres a few...im not using the dendarra one you know

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/76064f1ee506.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9abb4ca20a58.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/324892c3fbeb.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d3b26580dcd9.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/99b7d5b1ccff.gif[/atsimg]

ancientskyscraper.com...

interpret them as you wish...

At last we seem to have made some head way here with the difference between experiment and the device. It's a start.

the device in its entirety is an experiment including whether they could build it or not

reply to post by theAymen


The fact is that there are no wells. The fact that the tunnels appear to be unfinished is immaterial. There are no wells.

reply to post by theAymen

i clearly showed you that a fluxuation will take plase...describe the effects as you wish

That is a lie. You did not.

the subterranean chamber you see there at the bottom in the BASEMENT was known..officially as a "bottomless pit"!
a more sane person said it was a well that had a water pump attached.
i dont know the name of him but he was french..and he built a working model.

The image you posted showing a well in the bottom of the pyramid is a hoax. This just goes to show how the fake pharaoh, which is you, has been duped AGAIN. Yes you fell for a stupid hoax someone posted online. I'm not surprised.

interpret them as you wish...bearing in mind..there is no 2dimensional texts here that ur brain is familiar with.

Not a single image of a bulb, wires, power supply or anything to suggest that.

the device in its entirety is an experiment including whether they could build it or not

There you go and demonstrate it - you've learned nothing.

reply to post by theAymen


Posting copyrighted material as you have is not allowed by law.

I asked you to provide supporting evidence, not to break the law.

your getting very tedious and lame. especially your name calling...

The only person doing name calling is you. All I've done is point out instances of you telling lies. That's fair game. Tell a lie and people point it out. If you don't want people to point out lies, then be truthful.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by theAymen

 

i clearly showed you that a fluxuation will take plase...describe the effects as you wish
That is a lie. You did not.

yes refer to my FTE comments posts and links

The image you posted showing a well in the bottom of the pyramid is a hoax. This just goes to show how the fake pharaoh, which is you, has been duped AGAIN. Yes you fell for a stupid hoax someone posted online. I'm not surprised.

a hoax?? lollolol...
the image is of a chamber..WHICH EXISTS....someone else called it a well...which makes more sense then a bottomless pit

also herdotus (greek historian) claimed a there is a well


ALSO WHAT MAKES YOU THINK YOU KNOW MORE THEN ME ON EGYPT?
I AM PHARAOH

Click here for more information.

reply to post by theAymen

the image is of a chamber..WHICH EXISTS....someone else called it a well...which makes more sense then a bottomless pit

also herdotus (greek historian) claimed a there is a well

ALSO WHAT MAKES YOU THINK YOU KNOW MORE THEN ME ON EGYPT?
I AM PHARAOH

The image you posted is a fraud. There is no well. I have been in that room as have hundreds of thousands of tourists and there is no well there.

Your claim concerning the well is not only a fraud, but a stupid fraud. It's not like the idiotic claims to closed off portions of the Great Pyramid.