the LHC, solar flares and 2012, this is how they are linked and why!

Originally posted by stereologist

1) the electrolysis of water......wikipedia electrolysis of water
as i said i think they used sound frequency to seperate the hydrogen from oxygen

2) what do you think a magnetic revesal is ??!!! p.o.l.a.r. s.h.i.f.t

you want proof that egyptians knew about electricity...there are many peices of evidence like the alexandria lighthouse...heiroglyphs (like the one in my avatar)

well here is a scientists view and below is one image of many...

"Wilkinson's mention of the lack of evidence for the “use of torches” by the ancient Egyptians reminds us of what the renowned astronomer Sir J. Norman Lockyer, who studied ancient Egyptian temples and tombs in depth, reported in 1894. In his Dawn of Astronomy, he pointed out an enigma—at the time—when he wrote: "In all freshly-opened tombs there are no traces whatever of any kind of combustion having taken place, even in the inner-most recesses. So strikingly evident is this that my friend M. Bouriant, while we were discussing this matter at Thebes, laughingly suggested the possibility that the electric light was known to the ancient Egyptians." That “possibility” has become reality. Now we know the ancient Egyptians did, indeed, know all about “the electric light” and used it to illuminate the night sky as well as temples and tombs—and it is no longer a laughing matter."

filaments (right top corner)
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/324892c3fbeb.jpg[/atsimg]

isis holding (hathor wife to the god of light) lamp/torches
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9abb4ca20a58.jpg[/atsimg]

here are two lame sites but they have the relevant images
1) ancient electricity
2) more heiroglyphs..

Click here for more information.

reply to post by theAymen


1) electrolysis of water
Your link states:

Electrolysis of water is the decomposition of water (H2O) into oxygen (O2) and hydrogen gas (H2) due to an electric current being passed through the water.

You claimed they got electricity out of the water. The link you provided shows you were wrong. There is nothing in the link supporting the use of sound. Failure!

2) No a polar shift is not a magnetic reversal. You should read Hapgoode and all of the other people that wrote about pole shifts to learn how wrong you are. The fact that you are unable to use terms properly is simply a result of a general lack of understanding of these types of issues. Failure!

The claims of the Egyptians having light bulbs is ludicrous at best. Please show me one light bulb from a tomb. Please show me one fragment of a light bulb from a tomb. Show me a wire they used. Show me a power supply they used. Show me a light bulb manufacturing center. Show me a tool to make light bulbs.

The filaments claim is so laughable it makes your notion of electrolysis look a little more legitimate. NO. I they are independent failures on your part.

Your claim that the scepter is actually a light suggests that Isis had her own special light as this one.

C hildren's Hippo Light

The number of failures you are wracking up is becoming truly amazing.

reply to post by dragnet53


Once again dragnet53 is completely wrong. Please add something to the thread topic. I know you can do it.

reply to post by dragnet53


If we were the same person explain how we are able to post within a minute of each other and sometimes within seconds of one another.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by theAymen

 

No a polar shift is not a magnetic reversal.

???? magnetic poles reversing is a polar shift..?

The filaments claim is so laughable it makes your notion of electrolysis look a little more legitimate. NO. I they are independent failures on your part.

wow..im so much smarter then you it makes me nauseous..LOOK

seperating h2o generates electricity

they had filaments which they lit up by generating electricity from water
here is a vid as i think you need visual aid

Your claim that the scepter is actually a light suggests that Isis had her own special light as this one.

tut tut
her scepter is normally a SET one...those two things shes holding in the above image are not scepters...

The number of failures you are wracking up is becoming truly amazing.

pharaoh doesnt fail.....

reply to post by theAymen


Very intriguing stuff theAymen S&F, and this post to put this thread on my subscription list

i know ... i know ... I've been doing this for years on ATS and for some it gets old, but....

nude [mirror] edun (eden, as in garden of)
boots [mirror] stood

blah blah blah, i know....

Hadron Collider

Read ill lock, know our day
red....ill.loc...no....r...dah
redilloc....nordah [mirror] Hadron Collider

thought i would share, (since perhaps people may not be absolutely sure about how information of communication from the future through a wormhole might be .... i don't know... reversed???

left< = past because that is the direction from which we are reading from, and right > =future because that is the direction in which we are reading into/going

Flux capaciter stuff,
-ET

keep a sense of humor, it may be needed...

reply to post by theAymen

magnetic poles reversing is a polar shift

Please read either Hancock or Hapgoode to get a basic understanding of what you do not understand - AT ALL. You continue to embarrass yourself in frontof everyone by demonstrating time and again your lack of understanding of the issue.

seperating h2o generates electricity

Actually, it takes energy to separate them. You get an F in basic chemistry.

Sorry, you receive so many F grades, but that's a problem only you can correct.

Ha Ha
- Nelson Muntz

Well, that was inappropriate

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by theAymen

 

magnetic poles reversing is a polar shift

Please read either Hancock or Hapgoode

Good advice, two good authors and great investigative journalistic, research, and speculative info, but based on scientific and historical reasoning.

btw, (yes, I did look it up to make sure) Hapgoode is spelled Hapgood, Charles, but that could have easily been a typo, I know. Just thought I would mention it. Feel free to correct me when I misspell a word, especially if I am constantly doing it

they are good reads,
ET

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by theAymen

 

Please read either Hancock or Hapgoode to get a basic understanding of what you do not understand - AT ALL. You continue to embarrass yourself in frontof everyone by demonstrating time and again your lack of understanding of the issue.

the poles in which the axis spin...could shift resulting in a magnetic reversal as well.

maybs this is what is confusing you...maybe the pole shift periods are longer then the solar maximum periods.

also i think you understand squat on the subject..your still stuck in 1960s science..

seperating h2o generates electricity
Actually, it takes energy to separate them. You get an F in basic chemistry.

Sorry, you receive so many F grades, but that's a problem only you can correct.

yes i said they used sound frequencys...that is my personal idea....as for your F i got an A in physics.
thank you

reply to post by Esoteric Teacher


I would call both of these authors failures for scientific validity. There are other threads demonstrating that pole shifts are slow and have not happened in 200My. The importance of these authors is not in the validity of their material, but in defining the proper usage of the term pole shift.

BTW, thanks for the author's name correction. Appreciated.

reply to post by theAymen

yes i said they used sound frequencys...that is my personal idea....as for your F i got an A in physics.

Due to your repeated mistakes in even simple issues I simply do not believe you.

The evidence for my opinion is ample:
1. No understanding of electrolysis
2. No understanding of ancient history
3. No understanding of pole shifts
4. Little or no understanding of the sun's magnetic field

reply to post by theAymen

the poles in which the axis spin...could shift resulting in a magnetic reversal as well.

You embarrass yourself yet again. You are tossing out nonsense ideas. Find out how the Earth's magnetic field is generated and then how a pole shift is proposed by Hapgood and Hancock and others and then you'll understand why this makes no sense whatsoever.

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Esoteric Teacher

 

I would call both of these authors failures for scientific validity.

On many (many) aspects I agree, however there are still a few interesting nuggets of truth found in their literature. I still find the 19.5 degree thing from Hapgood an interesting observation. I'm referring to his theory ... well noticing i guess... of the fact that a perfect tetrahedron (pyramid) inside a perfect sphere places the base of the pyramid near 19.5 degrees off the equator, and that 19.5 degrees off the equator seems to be the most geographically active locations on all our neighboring planets, and us as well, being Hawaii, 19.5 degrees off the equator. Mar's being Olympus mons the largest known volcano in the solar system, Jupiter's being the great red spot, similiarities being they are all near to 19.5 degrees. This is one of the things I still find interesting about what I read from Hapgood, but admittingly it has been years since I have read any of his material, and I don't remember everything. As for Hancock, I remember liking his earlier work a lot. And I have read Fingerprints Of The Gods Four times over the years, and find many flaws in it as I learn more, but find some things neurally stimulating and informative. I agree there is some lack of scientific validity, but I do enjoy some of the speculation on other issues. I do like how Graham Hancock says "I believe we are a species with amnesia", and on some issues I tend to agree with him, our history has been tainted for thousands of years by agenda(s), special interest groups, those who did not want to admit they were wrong, national interests and secrets, social engineering, inventors who did not want their inventions to fall into the wrong hands and weaponized, and a slew of other reasons I can think of to not share truths and truisms with everyone.

peace,
ET

Originally posted by stereologist

Due to your repeated mistakes in even simple issues I simply do not believe you.

The evidence for my opinion is ample:
1. No understanding of electrolysis

tut tut..yes i do...google - water polarity as well

2. No understanding of ancient history

i am Pharaoh...i am the source

3. No understanding of pole shifts

no thats you...you confused solar maximums with pole shifts...i think polar shifts solar maximums and a magnetic flux..with the collider is a hazourd

4. Little or no understanding of the sun's magnetic field

no.. i think i showed you what an FTE is...

reply to post by Esoteric Teacher


It's off topic, but Hapgood was a history professor at Amherst who was thinking that an advanced civilization once existed on the continent of Antarctica. He supposed that if the skin of the Earth, the crust slipped in what he called an ECD, then the continent of Antarctica could have moved from a possible place for a civilization to an impossible place where it is today. In defense of this thinking it is important to understand that he conceived of this idea back in the 50s before plate tectonics was established. The oceans which cover around 70% of the surface were almost completely unknown. In light of that it was a reasonable idea. Now that plate tectonics has been established and large parts of the ocean bottom have been mapped including plate boundaries under the oceans, and seismographic stations capture the information from so much more of the world, it is fair to say that the sort of rapid pole shift envisioned by Hapgood and others do not happen. It certainly does not mean that Hapgood was a dummy. He tried to put together a reasonable, testable theory. It turned out to be wrong, but that's ok. For his time he dreamed up a reasonable idea.

On the other hand proposing pole shifts today is unreasonable. Today we know the crust is not rigid. It is composed of many independently moving plates. We know about isostacy and magnetic records in rocks. There is heaps of seismic, volcanic, and geophysical evidence against pole shifts.

Pole shifts have gone the way of crystal spheres, geocentric universe, phlogiston, N-rays, spontaneous generation, and countless other ideas.

reply to post by theAymen


All of your nay saying and complaining is worthless. You still get the F you earned. After many posts you still couldn't understand electrolysis.

So here is another odd statement.

i am Pharaoh...i am the source

Here is another reason to believe that you did not report the truth when you told us you received an A in physics.

Here is where you claim to be a pharoah.
Where Aymen claims he is a pharoah

it means that i am pharaoh...there is always a pharoah....every generation, since the death of osiris.

i can go through egypts history with you and prove it... i have been blessed with extreme knowlege of my heritage. though i have been raised in europe..my insight differs from my people...to ad pharaoh is supreme lord of the medjai. Which is i Aymen..Pharaoh

Claims he is pharaoh. Claims he got an A. Oh sure.