posted on Sep, 27 2010 @ 10:32 AM
So many answers already. I only read a couple before posting and they did not influence me.
Here's my thinking. A refused to build a raft for C because he wanted to fix the radio. However, B was able to make a raft in what seems to be a
rather short time. Perhaps A is not as handy in raft making, but I conceive that A could have set aside his radio work to make a raft had he wanted
to. He valued his own idea more than a person in obvious distress. Had I been A, I would have set aside the radio and made a raft for C, then gone
back to my radio AFTER I knew that C had made it to the island (in other words, not only would I build it, but I'd go with her across). I think that
is the properly caring answer, and A does not approach it. My value here is "people are more valuable than things." Perhaps we will never get off
these islands? We must be good to each other in any case. Of course, there may be more to it. Perhaps A knows C to be a trifling immature pest who
always wants someone else to do something for her. In that case, he might evaluate her request as inconsequential. But the story does not say this,
so I will not use it in my evaluation.
B agreed to help C but only after she has sex with him. This is selfish and somewhat predatory. We can perhaps understand this weakness, but it is
extremely hurtful to people (witness D's reaction). B's selfishness is somewhat modified by the fact that he made the raft, but this does not raise
him very high. He knew about their love and violated it anyway.
C seems to be driven almost mad with her desire to be with her mate. Not only does she agree to have sex with B for a raft, it doesn't seem to occur
to her to try to construct a raft herself. Perhaps she could not have done it as quickly as B, but it seems to me she might have made an attempt
before giving in to B's demands. Her desire to be with D seems to distract her reason, because she should have made the evaluation, which all humans
know, that infidelity causes strife. She also seems to have disregarded whether D might make a raft of his own. If they can see from one island to
another by moonlight, surely some communication could have been attempted. Her actions were rash and immature, and we can't really be sure how much
they were motivated by a true concern for D. Her quick acceptance of B's plan implies it is not D she is thinking of at all. I don't rate C very
high either.
D does not have much of a part in the story. He is the wounded man. We don't know how he would have reacted over time. He sends B away without
agreeing to talk about it, but he's angry as this has just happened. I don't think we have enough information to evaluate D, except to say that he
is not evolved to the status of a Saint just yet,
E gives C shelter after D sends her away. This is a selfless and humane act, though we can imagine that it could be motivated out of his own desires
to obtain C's sexual favors for himself. However, the story does not characterize his act, so I will assume it was genuine. This makes him the most
caring individual in my mind.
So I would put E on the end of highest good, followed somewhat distantly by A because he valued repairing the radio over helping a distraught C. B
and C are about even, though B did at least make a raft (though some might point out that C did at least cause B to experience something pleasant) but
in any case, both acted selfishly, though I find that the predatory nature of B's request tips the scale. I cannot really evaluate D without knowing
what happens later. If he NEVER listens to C's story or claims that it doesn't matter, I would find that a bit hard hearted. She was selfish, but
also apparently immature. She may grow beyond this stage. If he really loves her, he should give her a chance to prove that it was simply a
mistake.
So my list looks like this:
E A C B, and I don't know where to put D with the information at hand.