It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NightVision
Final Summation:
1) Blurry inconclusive ball of light UFO video #12,334,089 posted on ATS.
2) OP gets 15 minutes of fame.
3) Not amazing.
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
ETA: Grabbing screen shots probably wont help. As the object is so tiny. You just have to hit puase many times and watch frame by frame starting around 4:00. If you do this, you can see the wings flapping.
Originally posted by ReeVeeR reply to post by greeneyedleoBut the broadcast quality footage of this video was analyzed by the Marshall Space Flight Center, and what they said was that this object was 30ft long, 18ft thick, flying at an altitude of 500-700ft and travelling at 9-16,000 MPH. You're basically saying that the experts at Marshall Space Flight Center are wrong on that? ...
Originally posted by NightVision
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
holy crap! is that Bob Lazar?
Anybody who can see and has studied Ufology for more than 20 minutes knows thats Steven Greer.
Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher
Holy Crap! is that Dr. J. Allen Hynek?
0.tqn.com...
Originally posted by Goathief
Just noticed that there's another topic on ATS discussing this video:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I'm going through it now to see what was said there...
[edit on 2-7-2010 by Goathief]
That and the greenish hue of the clouds always alerted us to a tornado.
Originally posted by noisemedia
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Starting at 4:00 start hitting pause for every second - as the object goes thru the field of view. You will see that it is a bird flapping its wings. You have to view it this way (very slow, frame by frame) in order to see this.
[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]
Yeah...I can see that now... I will admit I got all excited for a minute there.
Is no one else seeing this?
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
It is clearly a bird. You can see the wings flapping if you watch in slow motion - or frame by frame. It is so obviously a bird, I cant even believe the people uploaded this claiming UFO.
I will try and get some screen captures up.
ETA: Grabbing screen shots probably wont help. As the object is so tiny. You just have to hit puase many times and watch frame by frame starting around 4:00. If you do this, you can see the wings flapping.
[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]
Originally posted by Masterjaden
Originally posted by noisemedia
Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Starting at 4:00 start hitting pause for every second - as the object goes thru the field of view. You will see that it is a bird flapping its wings. You have to view it this way (very slow, frame by frame) in order to see this.
[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]
Yeah...I can see that now... I will admit I got all excited for a minute there.
Is no one else seeing this?
If you look at its size in relation to how fast it is traveling, there is no way that it is a bird, unless it was shot out of a shotgun.
The insect theory is the only one that comes even potentially close to being possible, and I would be likely to go with that one for one simple reason.
Humans detect motion before any other type of visual stimulus. If it had passed right through their field of focus, like it appears to do if it is a large object far off, they would've been likely to have noticed it.
Since they didn't, you can make one of three conclusions. It was not at their field of focus and was therefore much closer (i.e. an insect) or it was not in a visual spectrum of light that is easily discernible to the naked eye but is after recording it on tape or HD, and or all of the viewers happened to not detect the motion at the time.
The first is probable, the second is fanciful and not as likely as an insect, and the third is possible considering how quickly it passed the screen and would seem to be about as likely as an insect but an insect being a less fanciful possibility would IMO be the more reasonable conclusion.
Jaden