UFO caught heading into tornado. Amazing footage *Video*

Originally posted by jimstradamus

Originally posted by greeneyedleo




[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]

Listening was pointless.

[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]

It usually is when you have already made up your mind

My mind was made up after I watched and slowed it down over and over. Then when people said the audio was important, I listened.

Thanks for the comment though

[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]

Generally birds follow the facetious advice often given to pilots -- "fly low and slow." Most cruise speeds are in the 20-to-30-mph range, with an eider duck having the fastest accurately clocked air speed of about 47 mph. During a chase, however, speeds increase; ducks, for example, can fly 60 mph or even faster, and it has been reported that a Peregrine Falcon can stoop at speeds of 200 mph (100 mph may be nearer the norm). Interestingly, there is little relationship between the size of a bird and how fast it flies. Both hummingbirds and geese can reach roughly the same maximum speeds.


With respect that is so wrong as to make me wonder about the person who wrote it qualifications. I'm pretty sure the Swift family own just about all the speed records. The white-throated needle tailed swift has been clocked at 105 mph that's 170 kph.

en.wikipedia.org...

Swifts and Swallows are amazing birds, watching them is an absolute joy. Also really good for predicting rain. If you can see them feeding, it's going to rain. They only feed on the wing and if you can see them doing so, it means the air pressure has dropped and the insects they mainly feed on are flying lower than usual.

[edit on 2-7-2010 by FireMoon]

Originally posted by greeneyedleo

Originally posted by jimstradamus

Originally posted by greeneyedleo




[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]

Listening was pointless.

[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]

It usually is when you have already made up your mind

My mind was made up after I watched and slowed it down over and over. Then when people said the audio was important, I listened.

Thanks for the comment though

[edit on July 2nd 2010 by greeneyedleo]

Thanks for your fully informed opinion

Final Summation:

1) Blurry inconclusive ball of light UFO video #12,334,089 posted on ATS.

2) OP gets 15 minutes of fame.

3) Not amazing.









[edit on 2-7-2010 by NightVision]

That was the roof of my grandmas chicken coop, we often wondered where it had gone that day.

I froze the pertinent frames. Overlayed the object from each individual frame. Enlarged by 1000%. Enhanced and re-rendered the image in a good software package for 3 hours and this is the result:





Definitely not a bird or insect!

Originally posted by torsion
I froze the pertinent frames. Overlayed the object from each individual frame. Enlarged by 1000%. Enhanced and re-rendered the image in a good software package for 3 hours and this is the result:

Definitely not a bird or insect!

Hmmm, I wouldn't say definately not an insect.

cinese lanterm
second line.

reply to post by greeneyedleo


Hello leo,

I wanted to bring to your attention (if it hasnt already been done so) that at 3:23 there is a TRUE bird flying in the air near the sunnier part of the cloud cover moving from right to left. clearly flapping wings etc.

i wanted to strongly encourage you to see the bird at 3:23-26 vs the 'Bird' at 3:40 which is the 'object' in question.

i was pleased to see a real bird fly by just before the object did that way you can compare birds. i hope this helps you see the tape in a new light. cheers.

-LT

[edit on 7/2/2010 by LordThumbs]

reply to post by Goathief


I've been searching a little and have not found the other photograph or the second video of the object in question that was used in triangulation with this video to determine the speed of the object. If I could find those perhaps I could better determine the accuracy of the experts claim on the speed.

This is very important information to have before declaring an extremely high number for speed. If anyone has the other photograph or video, it would be very good if you could post it.

Kind regards

AHahah, you guys got to be kidding me right??? That thing doesn't even fly anywhere close to the tornado, yet alone INTO it, you guys need a reality check and stop posting up these useless videos that show nothing but garbage...

Originally posted by ReeVeeR

Hmmm, I wouldn't say definately not an insect.

Errm, okay. Shall we agree on a moth, then?

Originally posted by YouCanCallMeKM
AHahah, you guys got to be kidding me right??? That thing doesn't even fly anywhere close to the tornado, yet alone INTO it, you guys need a reality check and stop posting up these useless videos that show nothing but garbage...

So your opinion is that was just garbage blowing by ?

Originally posted by greeneyedleo

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher


threads like this one remind me of why i joined ATS in the first place, 5 short years ago.

if i was a mod, i would consider providing some applause.

End Transmission,
ET

Im a MOD and I tend to spend a lot of time analysizng photos/videos here. Its a bird. Its 1000% a bird. You can see the wings flapping. The video is nothing but a cool storm video. There is zero UFO activity in it.

I cant even believe this made any media flap over some UFO. Anyone with fingers can hit pause/play and see...........its a bird


ETA:
For clarification: I do not think im better than anyone or an all knowing moderator or right while everyone is wrong.

so, are you saying you believe it is a bird?
and that you are adamant that it is a bird?
you may be correct in your ocularly derived and critical analysis skills.
i see it now! it is a penguine!
(i got one of those "acer" small laptops i'm working off of right now and i didn't bother try to enlarge the video.)

sometimes ignorance must be denied (in this case maybe mine)
i'll try not to be a about it.
__________________________________________

i'm no meteorologist, but after a few more viewings i'm wondering if it isn't due to some temperature inversion playing tricks on light that is refracting off of venus and passing through some swamp gas and misinterpretted incorrectly by the senses due to element 115 being dispersed via chemtrails by the reptillians representatives from planet X in preparations for December 21st, 2012?

peace greeneyedleo & thanks for what you do,
ET

with a little less ignorance inside... i almost feel "lighter"...
curious feeling

[edit on 2-7-2010 by Esoteric Teacher]

I would love to see some screenshots to prove that it is a bird. I have viewed the video at full screen numerous times and cannot see any "wing flap". It would have been great if there was a flag or something in the video to see the wind direction at the time of the objects flight through the field of view.

reply to post by groingrinder


I am relieved to hear you say this. i can easily imagine you sitting in your chair TOTALLY STUMPED as to how someone can say (repeatedly) that this is clearly a wing flapping bird,...if you noticed my previous post on page 4 you will see that i attempt to bring LEO's attention to a poor little bird trying to fly the heck out of dodge at 3:23-26 in the film moving from right to left in the sunnier part of the cloud cover. this my friend is what a wing flapping bird looks like on film. at 3:40 you see the object zoom by not even phased by the wind.

Originally posted by Hitotsumami
reply to post by Goathief

 

I've been searching a little and have not found the other photograph or the second video of the object in question that was used in triangulation with this video to determine the speed of the object.

if you find what you are looking for, please share it with us


me? i'm not sure if i need to wait for the trigonometry and geometry findings to form a relativly speculative opinion that due to the proximity of the camera to the cloud wall in the distance that the higher end approximation of the "expert" may not be an accurate representation of the truth.

but i may be mistaken. there are variables i may not be aware of.

yep yep,
ET

If the object was as large and moving as fast and low in altitude as the "analyst" suggests, then we should have heard a sonic boom on the tape. This has me stumped.

Originally posted by torsion
I froze the pertinent frames. Overlayed the object from each individual frame. Enlarged by 1000%. Enhanced and re-rendered the image in a good software package for 3 hours and this is the result:

Definitely not a bird or insect!

holy crap! is that Bob Lazar?

Originally posted by Esoteric Teacher


holy crap! is that Bob Lazar?

Anybody who can see and has studied Ufology for more than 20 minutes knows thats Steven Greer.