DEW/Energy Weapons? Holograms? TV Fakery? No Planes at the WTC? -- A 9/11 Disinfo Campaign

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: wildb

In regard to John Lear, and this claims about 9/11, he has been successfully debunked.

Yes I know...we already talked about this..

REMINDER...

This thread is about 9/11, so please stick to the topic.....which for sure is not other members......

You are responsible for your own posts.

Here is an interesting video that shows the plane hitting the tower and part of it seems to dissapear before it hits as well as go into the building before the structural damage happened.

So here are videos of the buildings exploding without the planes, from various camera angles and news sources. . . . .

^should this no planes theory stuff be censored out of here ? Or is the only censorship going on here to keep us from debunking debunkers?

according to www.abovetopsecret.com...

For now, new "TV Fakery" or "No Planes" threads based on the work of this group will be deleted. Please use the existing thread indicated above to add any new material to the discussion. Repeated attempts to start new threads may result in account termination. If we see an improvement in tone, and an effort for collaboration, this restriction will likely be lifted. It's up to them.

a reply to: FormOfTheLord

So here are videos of the buildings exploding without the planes, from various camera angles and news sources. .

Of course WTC 1 and WTC 2 were struck by aircraft. How did this fuselage wreckage come from?

Photo: United 175 Wreckage

Photo: American 11 Wreckage

Photo: American 11 Tire and Wheel Assembly

Photo: Engine Core

Sky you know proof will get you nowhere on a conspiracy site.

Speculation and conjecture with a dash of hear say are the only forms of proof believed in the conspiracy world.

Please excuse me while I chase that unicorn out of my yard.

a reply to: samkent

I can remember when I once joked about government-engineered metal-eating termites in another forum and I was surprised that a 9/11 conspiracy theorist had thought that i was serious and he was going to post it on the Internet before I told him that I was just joking. If I had not stopped him, I'd probably being trying to debunk a claim that the government planted metal-eating termites in WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7.

Simply amazing!!

a reply to: skyeagle409

The OTHER SIDE OF COIN commented on this - lack of any type of critical or logical thinking

Too many people here wrapped up in their own conspiracy fantasy - anything which fails to confirm it
is rejected

a reply to: skyeagle409

government-engineered metal-eating termites

Oh WOW!
You just explained that redish brown stuff around my fenders.
It's a government ploy to get me to buy a new car.

I came back here just to point out the truth of what happened here is not a conspiracy and is fully known.

In the process a lot of people have used this incident to profiteer, others have been disinformation agents, others lack the appropriate backgrounds scientifically and in the intelligence community to understand this.

A forum like this does not help anyone get to the truth based on the anonymous design and server side structure. In fact this incident should not even be labelled and placed here in a conspiracy form.

After the ISIS attack with a tnt bomb on a plane in Egypt on a Russian plane which now Putin admits was a bomb and the terrorist incidents in Paris, France, we see the type of attacks these groups are responsible for.

Just ask yourself, how does Jetfuel A used by the United States with known finite properties, even cause anything close to the effects we saw at Ground Zero. Maybe you need to look up what Ground Zero used to mean in a dictionary pre 9/11/2001 when dictionaries started to change the definition as confirmed in the different editions.

Study the properties of Grade A jetfuel and run your own tests.

I am not going into detail to let terrorists know how to get dangerous weapons they can use on us, but only high energy weapons beyond jetfuel caused these effects. And the sad part is, 9/11 was a wakeup call since damage was minimal compared to the damage the most powerful weapons on the planet earth can accomplish.

a reply to: FormOfTheLord

And I thought no way could I ever go so far as to believe
there may not have been any planes. Fact is, it's cut dry
that the OS is completely fabricated without having to go
to this length. But now, it's still cut and dry. After pointing
at so many obvious lies concerning the events of 911. It
makes good sense that the vids would be another leg of
the fabrication going on that day. Along with a plane that
disappeared into it's own crater. And buildings that fell
like a demolition crew did their job perfectly. With a plane
and some jet fuel, we learned those silly crews are a bunch of
phonies.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: FormOfTheLord

And I thought no way could I ever go so far as to believe
there may not have been any planes. Fact is, it's cut dry
that the OS is completely fabricated without having to go
to this length. But now, it's still cut and dry. After pointing
at so many obvious lies concerning the events of 911. It
makes good sense that the vids would be another leg of
the fabrication going on that day. Along with a plane that
disappeared into it's own crater. And buildings that fell
like a demolition crew did their job perfectly. With a plane
and some jet fuel, we learned those silly crews are a bunch of
phonies.

If you watch some of the videos out there you can clearly see the offical story is a bunch of BS. . . .

But hey its a free country and people can choose to believe whatever they want, you just cant make people see something they dont want to see, or understand something they dont want to know. Its commonly known as willfull ignorance.

a reply to: randyvs

And buildings that fell
like a demolition crew did their job perfectly.

Please show us any video of a professional demo that looks like WTC 1&2.

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: randyvs

And buildings that fell
like a demolition crew did their job perfectly.

Please show us any video of a professional demo that looks like WTC 1&2.

There is no direct comparison even if you think this was underground nuclear demolition or whatnot. The building damage behind WT7 shows corner based damage which is a telltale sign that the demolition of WTC caused that building to get damaged on the corner based on energy that was sourced specifically for the demolition of WTC 7.

The building name was documented om the internet and was something like fitterman or firemans or something like that. I don't recall the name.

a reply to: BlackOp007

There is no direct comparison even if you think this was underground nuclear demolition or whatnot. The building damage behind WT7 shows corner based damage which is a telltale sign that the demolition of WTC caused that building to get damaged on the corner based on energy that was sourced specifically for the demolition of WTC 7.

That is incorrect. There were no demolition explosions at ground zero during 9/11