Were Humans Created by Reptilians?

www.nissaba.nl...

source
tiny.cc...

35,000 years ago.

In a family tree the only "main trunk" is due to your persepective. Which line you happen to be looking at at the moment.

There is no "Main Trunk" of a family tree.

Each and every person is an offshoot, and the only traceable path is the one of common currency of familial relations to make your case.

Since people on here seem to think that 14th cousins twice removed means something to this "common currency" of traits, I'd like one to explain HOW.

People like to marry others who have important values and familial structure to them. This tends to lead to the most stable marriages with the least amount of work needed in tending them.

In the case of the heriditary rich, this significantly limits their pool of perspective mates.

That's your answer.

Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Aeons

 

???? but the dude has more money than half the planet. he's filthy rich and is the leader of one of the richest countries in the world. why his cousin? it isn't like he didn't have a smorgasbord to choose from. he deliberately married his cousin, on purpose! and he's a well educated member of the elite of europe. what is the point of marrying your own family members???

[edit on 2-3-2010 by undo]

Here's how it happens as an example.

4th Princess marries a Duke.

Their 3rd daughter marries an Earl.

Their 2nd daughter marries a merchant.

Their 2nd daughter moves away and marries Joe Blow.

Why Why Why is this not obvious to you?

Regardless, the last child born in this is still a "direct descendant."



[edit on 2010/3/3 by Aeons]

reply to post by Aeons


so that would explain things like the first born tradition? which opens a whole new can of worms, as you can well imagine.

for example: the first born of egypt were slain by the angel of death. gilgamesh made it a point to impregnate all brides of his kingdom, on the eve of their weddings to their real husbands so their first born child would be a biological descendant of him, and he claimed he was 2/3rds god. now what is 2/3rds god? well, just look at the oldest pictures of the entities he claims descendancy from
front
oi.uchicago.edu...
side
oi.uchicago.edu...


[edit on 3-3-2010 by undo]

i admittedly got sucked into this thread it seems the reptillians not only made man but are also great for your star and flags count.
im starting to wonder if threads like this are an internal ATS conspiracy to build profiles by feeding off the weak dellusional minds looking for fantasy to shade their reality.
People! reptillians living under the earth? that have infiltrated our society in human form.?? uhh really?? how do you figure this?
Uhh sounds like the story line from V no???
Im really shocked that any one who claims to be looking for clarity from ignorance would pen their name to such an unproven off center and totally fairy tale concept as this!!
Deny Ignorance ??
= reptillian overlords WHAT???
REALLY??
Be Well

reply to post by SmokeJaguar67

www.aboblood.com...


I am at a loss for words. I think as children we see tragedy in an abject way knowing there is nothing you can do to prevent it. You watch as if a movie were playing without connecting to the scene. This is to protect your psyche, your mental health from damaging irreparably. Shock is an insulator.
I don't think this reaction would be different in most nine year olds. There are those who scream no matter what while everyone else is dumbstruck.
I am envious of your discipline. We are alike when it comes to avoiding humans and thinking that animals deserve special consideration by thinking people. They cannot escape their fates since we humans lord over them.

I was going to ask how you react to animals like horses, dogs and cats which I think are all pretty human sensitive. How are you around electrical items? Television sets and electrics seem to "choke up" and go haywire for a few seconds...leading me to believe I am not good with anything electronic.

If RH- is less complex than RH+ how can RH+ be thought to exist first? I would expect just the opposite.

I am looking at the link above as well as Aeon's ortho-wire link- also good (where it says again, these blood types have survived WITHOUT mutation) I would like to find out his source for saying neanderthals (which might mean Netherlanders) were RH Negative and usually O
.
Another source says RH- has been around the last 35,000 years, does not occur in nature EXCEPT by accident it happened crossbreeding a horse with a mule.
It is too much of a coincidence ancient Sumerian texts saying 35,000 years ago a people came here and started crossbreeding to make humans and about that time RH- appears on the scene, (in such small numbers too which is strange)

Anyway not ashamed to say I am stumped and have no ideas right now.
Just mulling it all around.



Hope you enjoy your walk today!

reply to post by triplescorpio


what is your criteria for comparison? at least we are producing documents and artifacts to back up the claim. how anyone who claims they believe in evolution, could look at a planet filled to the brim with reptiles and amphibians for millions of years, and then claim there's no way they could've evolved to be sentient lifeforms, is beyond me! and THAT'S just considering normal evolution. add to that potential genetic manipulation, and now you have a whole pandora's box of possibilities.

[edit on 3-3-2010 by undo]

reply to post by undo


Uhh seriously evidence that was fabricated by manipulating peices of history and bits of science thats not a theory its a story.
I mean really man come on they live in hollow earth have you ever read a geology book?
the president is a reptillian
WHAT!!!
meds meds meds peoples
I dunno
sorry im clearly out numbered and there will be no reasoning sorry to throw the thread off just i dunno this is so not possible on any level even remotely based in reality .
im out
Be Well folks
my apologies for interupting

reply to post by triplescorpio


i don't personally believe in the hollow earth theory. my belief is even crazier yet. that the references to underground cities is not that they were themselves underground, but portals to those locations WERE underground. but these ideas come from actually reading, researching and viewing the data from the ancient civs, and having some respect for their material. you think they were all liars for 6000 years. i don't.

reply to post by rusethorcain


I have been contemplating the idea the Annunaki (or whoever) did one or some of the following: Created us, came down and messed with our dna, or something else completely. This RH- business dating back to these times really makes you think.
And another thing maybe someone can answer for me, please, is did the annunaki come down and physically procreate with us and this produced the nephilim? I want to make sure I understand if this is right. If so, then that couldn't be the cause for RH-, because these people would be "giants" if you took it literally. And didn't the flood wipe most of them out?
I am sure maybe there are other races of ET's out there...maybe that can help explain the blood types? My opinion about the whole thing is that we all have mixed/hybrid blood, if indeed the annunaki story is true. I was just thinking outside the box. Please don't attack my theory, this is just thinking with the story. I still don't fully believe it yet...can't wrap my head around reptilians. LOL.

reply to post by rusethorcain


Those links show that Rh indeed mutates. RhD is a known deletion which causes a negative blood type and is absolutely caused by miscoding.

Only a complete blank of the three genes would not mutate. On the loci of both the two chromosones you have for it. Something dominates over nothing.

here's a link about the O- Neanderthal. www.newscientist.com...

If you are heterozygous for Rh factor between two parents, they have a 1/4 chance every time of having a child of Rh-.

SERIOUSLY PEOPLE. People have been discussing this ....ridiculous claim for YEARS and none of you has thought to go look at the work about Rhesus factor? How genes work? How inheritance of it works?



[edit on 2010/3/3 by Aeons]

reply to post by Aeons


i've done some preliminary investigation into genetics. i had decided to major in natural medicine in college, which required a MD degree, regardless. i was on the deans list and the presidents list. a sorority for geniuses invited me to join their ranks, as did mensa. i'm not stupid, per sey, perhaps a little memory challenged these days, but not stupid.

anyway, one of the avenues of research i went down was regarding the human genome project. and although this post doesn't pertain specifically to RH blood types, I would like to call your attention to what i consider to be one of most bizaare decisions in genetic science, perhaps since its inception:

they had cataloged the genome, applied numerical identifiers, fed the data into a computer and told it to look for the missing genes between the last known predecessor in the evolutionary tree and homo sapiens. then compare those to the other genomes of animal, insect, bacteria and viri, that have since been cataloged. the end result was a sideways or lateral insertion of genes from bacteria.

if you think about that for a bit, with as many genes as there are in a given chromosome, the odds of finding a match were extremely good. so to expect that everything they say about human blood is equally written in stone from the mouth of god variety, well, you'll excuse me if i use my reason there as well.

Originally posted by rusethorcain
Another source says RH- has been around the last 35,000 years, does not occur in nature EXCEPT by accident it happened crossbreeding a horse with a mule.
It is too much of a coincidence ancient Sumerian texts saying 35,000 years ago a people came here and started crossbreeding to make humans and about that time RH- appears on the scene, (in such small numbers too which is strange)

Anyway not ashamed to say I am stumped and have no ideas right now.
Just mulling it all around.

I know when things get heated the posts start to fly and other posts get buried rather quickly, but here is an eariler post of mine that kind of replies to your statement above.

reply to post by Xtrozero



Cheers

and I posted about how Rh polymorphism is found in gorillas, chimpanzees, and probably orangantans.

And that there is a case for selection advantage of Rh- individuals by pathogens.

[edit on 2010/3/3 by Aeons]

[edit on 2010/3/3 by Aeons]

Originally posted by undo

what is your criteria for comparison? at least we are producing documents and artifacts to back up the claim. how anyone who claims they believe in evolution, could look at a planet filled to the brim with reptiles and amphibians for millions of years, and then claim there's no way they could've evolved to be sentient lifeforms, is beyond me! and THAT'S just considering normal evolution. add to that potential genetic manipulation, and now you have a whole pandora's box of possibilities.

[edit on 3-3-2010 by undo]

Thinking of a sentient reptillian lifeform that may have existed 10s or 100s of millions of years ago is one thing. Thinking that they are still here hiding in plain sight is a totally different event.

I for one am not convinced that "intelligence" is a good trait. If we look back on the evolutionary tree of man we would see one line from the beginning, but looking forward starting at the beginning we would see many off shoots of bad evolutionary traits that just didn’t make it and died out.

Intelligence has not only made us unable to live a month outside our little artificial bubbles, but it has given us the power to destroy every living thing on earth, and to affect the earth on a global level. Are we so really sure that when intelligence rears its ugly head it doesn’t die off like all the other bad traits?

Intelligence may have come and gone many times in the past, but I really feel we put way too much faith in the idea that other species have evolved into some extremely advance state here on earth. As I said before, at some point our own technology should find something to back all this up, but we really have no more evidence than the ones who wrote on clay tablets 4000 years ago.




[edit on 3-3-2010 by Xtrozero]

reply to post by Aeons


the problem with "probably" is that in mainstream science,
"probably" becomes FACT very quickly, even though it's still "probably." usually the "probably" facts are socially advantageous to those who want to
reshape the human populace to fit their model of an utopian future. it's kinda scary thinking a "probably" was the result of the 40 million people killed by Stalin, alone.

reply to post by Xtrozero


wait. so now smart people are bad. but they're not bad if they agree with you but otherwise they are bad because they made atom bombs and dangerous chemicals, even though most intelligent people do not make atom bombs and chemicals. if you ask me, your criteria for what is and isn't bad intelligence is pretty wishy washy and highly selective.

Originally posted by undo
reply to post by Aeons

 

the problem with "probably" is that in mainstream science,
"probably" becomes FACT very quickly, even though it's still "probably." usually the "probably" facts are socially advantageous to those who want to
reshape the human populace to fit their model of an utopian future. it's kinda scary thinking a "probably" was the result of the 40 million people killed by Stalin, alone.

I think my main argument for aliens, Reptilians, ghost..etc is everything that we use as evidence is third party/human created. So we can research and study until we pass out but all of it is still man made. That alone drives my beliefs and until we get something anything that was not generated by us, I do not see any true answers to any of this.