Were Humans Created by Reptilians?

Originally posted by RedDragon
reply to post by Golden Boy

 

im sure lots of tribes did that. lots of tribes also did as i explained.

Yes, but the fact that not all tribes had a ruling family kind of screws up the whole "constant bloodline" thing. You also assume that all ruling families would mix with all the others.

we're a huge democracy compared to old democracies. 300 million people. that's more than the population of the entire planet back during roman, greek times, etc. so, a huge base of common people. yet, our last president was the son of the president two presidents before him.

*shrugs*

Families often follow each other into politics. Yeah, Bush junior had some added political clout from daddy, but this doesn't show that there's a ruling bloodline.

so even with those constraints, youre still going to get distinct genetic qualities, including bloodlines, in leaders just as you would be able to find the same in any other trade like mathematics, etc. using a process like something i described.

Maybe. I dunno. I'm going to have to do some more research on this.

reply to post by Sparkey76


well you might try on your research to start with nimrod.

nimrod was the akkadian enmerkar and the egyptian narmer/menes.
when he died, he was known as ausir or ausar (osiris), a title most likely related to his stint at expanding asshur. he was
emperor of the known world after the black sea flood, which would've effected mesopotamian, egyptian, russian and european civilizations for certain.

mother: mizraim
father: cush
grandfather: ham
great grandfather: noah
great great grandfather: Lamech
great great great grandfather: Methuselah
great great great great grandfather: Enoch
great great great great great grandfather: Jared
great great great great great great grandfather: Mahalalel
great great great great great great great grandfather: Kenan
great great great great great great great great grandfather: Enosh
great great great great great great great great great grandfather: Seth
great great great great great great great great great great grandfather: Adam

nimrod's is modified after he's born. he becomes a nephilim. you can read what they may entail in the akkadian text, enmerkar and the lord of arrata.

egyptian son:
heru (horus), who was also known as the egyptian hor-aha.

lineage from heru
djer
wadj
den
betrest (female)
and it's here where the thing breaks down. you might want to see if you can follow it. the problem i'm noticing is as regards length of dynasties and whether there were co-regent pharaohs at any given point in time.
but if you can connect European royalty to betrest, you'll have yourself a nephilim trail.

as an adjunct to this, consider this:

3/4 of my dads siblings are math/science fields. im going to a math/ science field. my grandfather was in a math/science field. 2 of these people didn't choose their career for it either; they were directed into it by natural aptitude once in the military.

carry this on for 200,000 years. im probably going to marry someone good at math. my kids are going to be good at math. this is bloodlines crossing with me and in the future, my kids and their kids to create a distinct bloodline common to mathematicians.

200,000 years from now, this bloodline would theoretically be in a lot of mathematicians. people good at politics probably follow a similar process.

im not a reptilian and most people good at math probably aren't either (at least i hope my future coworkers aren't reptilians!). i bet we share some bloodlines though that are less common in the general population.

you can probably find similar bloodlines and genetic qualities among poor people, uneducated people, athletes, etc.

i dont think most poor people, uneducacted people, and athletes are reptilians either.

also pretty sure my math professors aren't reptilians.

[edit on 3/2/10 by RedDragon]

reply to post by Sparkey76


Yep - you could certainly be clearer. Still doesn't make any connection to why the Most Recent Common male and female ancestor have any relationship to your contention. Or why you would use it as a point of defense at all.

BTW, I am related to Ulysses Grant. His grandmother is a several times removed grandmother of mine. This is not the only person I am related to who is in the US government.

And while I admit that we often joke about psoriasis being just the reptile side of the family, it is just that ....a joke.

So please, tell me about how reptilian I am. And all powerful. I like that part.

[edit on 2010/3/2 by Aeons]

reply to post by Golden Boy


there's really nothing to research. all i did was look at how people act now or were known to have acted then and then extrapolated to what that would result in if they kept acting like it for a long period of time. which is: common bloodlines and genetic qualities among groups of the same type of people (eg politicians, mathematicians, scientists, educated, etc).

i mean, how often does a white person marry a black person? sometimes, but less commonly than marrying another white person. thus there are bloodlines more common in white people than black people and vice versa..

as long as politicians have kids with politicians/ leaders families at a higher rate than the general population, this trend is going to develop common bloodlines. obviously, politicians often marry family of other politicians or people high class society. thus, youre going to have to find common bloodlines here than are less present in normal people.

reply to post by Elieser


I saw a movie once, with Jason Scott Lee, Rapa Nui. In the film, the highest honor in the tribe was the be the Birdman, this title would be held for one year, and during that time his particular tribe would be at the top when it came to things. Below are some links which may interest you on this subject matter.

Connecting with Bird People

FOR WE ARE BIRD PEOPLE!

The Carians (the Bird People)Parent Race of the Reptilians

Quetzalcoatl "feathered-serpent"

Snake-bird gods fascinated both Aztecs and Ancient Egyptians

Bird Headed Beings in Mythology

Originally posted by Lois
reply to post by autowrench

 

www.gotquestions.org...

The following from the above link may be an explaination...
"
Therefore, God veils Himself and appears in forms in which we can “see” Him. However, this is different than seeing God with all His glory and holiness displayed. People have seen visions of God, images of God, and appearances of God, but no one has ever seen God in all His fullness (Exodus 33:20)."

This passage just more or less proves the point that the [God] worshipped by thousands of Christians is something that, if they saw it with their eyes, they would turn away in fear, and loathing, for they would see the Dragon Old, the Serpent that is spoken of 26 times in the OT.

reply to post by Lois


Lois, if you have been reading me, you have no doubt read my theory of the Creative Force of High Intelligence. This is not a God, this is a vast energy force, beyond our human understanding. All things matter, except that which we of the human race have created, and is all things spiritual. That which mankind/womankind has worshipped (word means "work") is not Gods at all, but are rather beings that are far older than we, and perhaps higher in intelligence and technology that we are, and are easily able to effect what we would call supernatural and magick. In today's world this would be seen right through by most intelligent people, but! 2000-3000 years ago, things were vastly different. You are clinging to ancient beliefs.

Originally posted by rusethorcain


This is one of the more repulsive claims. It is the 600 pound gorilla in the room and I have to throw it out there for ridicule...

The symbol for alpha romera is a snake eating an infant.
Of course this is totally unbelievable until you look at the numbers of missing children: www.missingkids.com...
The U.S. Department of Justice’s National Incidence Study reported that 1.7 million children run away or are thrown away each year, with just 357,600 reported as missing to the police. Combined with claims from sites like this (not for the squeamish)
www.reptilianagenda.com...
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

Thank you, rusethorcain, for shining a light on these missing children, it is a gorilla that sits there unnoticed, isn't it? I have read that the Draconian eat human beings, and prefer children. These missing kids have to be going some place.

And lets take woman's right to terminate a pregnancy. Yes I said it. Do you ever closely observe some of the "religious right" fighting most passionately against a woman's medical privacy? They are armed and ruthless. Not always "compassionate people" for the lifes work they choose -if you catch my drift. The most notorious one lately is a killer who brought a gun into a church and murdered a man in front of his whole family. I understand a certain amount of passion for a cause but this is over the top. They are all over the top and seem to stop at nothing.

I have honestly entertained the prospect that among other groups many in the "religious right" so passionately anti abortion are not concerned with "life and when it begins" or the "soul" or even the infant fetus.

They are reptilians violently protecting a vital food source.

I know. I should be ashamed. See? Shame

Thank you for "saying it." I too am for women's rights across the board, a woman's body is her own, and her decision on whether to carry or abort. Ever notice how the loudest protesters are always men? And you make a good theory here too, if the reptilians are controlling at the highest levels, is is simply connecting the dots that what you said is viable, and wholly believable. A star for your post!

Originally posted by serbsta

Originally posted by autowrench

And what about the "cunning serpent in the Garden of Edin? This is the correct spelling of the word, BTW.

There was never a serpent/snake in the Garden of Eden. It is a gross mistranslation which has spiraled out of control through countless adaptations and through the arts. The original Hebrew word which was used was nachash. This does not mean serpent, it is an adjective meaning 'bright or 'shining'. What Eve supposedly saw was a bright/shining entity. The reason this being was later replaced to be a snake was possibly due to its supposed persona, being cunning and tempting, much like a snake. Most of this reptilian representation in ancient texts, I believe, is mostly due to the human fear of any creature reptilian. They therefore associated reptilian creatures with figures of power or with figures of evil.

In regards to those two extracts from the New Testament. When it is talking about 'below' the Earth it is most likely referencing Hell as that is the original place where Christians believed Hell was. Since Hell is not in the original Hebrew Bible or in the KJV for that matter, then this theory doesn't hold too much water. If not Hell, then it is the buried dead. Can't be anything else in my opinion.

[edit on 28/2/2010 by serbsta]

adam and eve were two reptiles sentenced to Earth and the forbidden fruith was not to have sex with the eartlinks but eventually they did dirting up theirs and our genes.We were invaded by them and still under their occupation. They cant leave and staying here they have to feed of our energy so basically they rape kill and eat our children and these who cant they suck as much energy of them as they can so we are their fuel.
everybody should read this before asking or writing anything serious
xeeatwelve.net

reply to post by k3456789


Can you please explain how an organism that is essentially a reptile is able to produce offspring with an organism that is a primate? That would be the only way for them to "dirty up" our genes.

reply to post by DeltaChaos

I just cringe when I see people claiming 'years of research' (read as: 'reading stuff on the internet'), and 'obvious fact' (read as: 'embrace ignorance').

Read on the internet? guilty. But, most of my reading came from books. I am 56 years old my last BD. During that time I have read a great many books on every subject matter you can think of. I am a Seeker by nature, and curious to a fault. Speaking conservative, I have read some 10,000 books. This is not to brag, or to say I am better than you, it is just to show you that I actually have put the time in to read, and to learn, and to gain knowledge, and not just to copy/paste from other people's work.
I also have what I can a multi-dimensional way of thinking, that is, I can easily see a thing, or a topic from all angles and avenues.

Originally posted by Golden Boy

Originally posted by spy66

Originally posted by Golden Boy

Originally posted by spy66
The American presidency seams to fallow this blood line. The blood line of Kings.

The evidence for this assertion being...?

On Google! search for it. I am not going to do that for you.

I did a Google search. I found nothing with any verifiable sources. What source did you use?

I never said anything about verifiable. No more then that most of the American presidents have royal blood.

I am only speculating, and i have not tried to convince you otherwise.

This is a myth i can't verify anything.

reply to post by B.Morrison


Very sorry. My fault, not yours, I was the sarcastic one. It is forgotten from my world.
We are not here to fight, that is what TPTB want us to do. We are here to learn from each other. Look at this site. It is the biggest conspiracy website on the world wide web.
Period. I don't know how many members are here, but I do know I have read people from all over the world, even China. I have read some pretty interesting people, such as John Lear, and Sgt. Clifford Stone. I have met some very intelligent people, some of which I am certain are not wholly human, and that is OK, for it is time for ALL BEINGS to come together in Love, not Hate.

Originally posted by spy66

Originally posted by Golden Boy

Originally posted by spy66

Originally posted by Golden Boy

Originally posted by spy66
The American presidency seams to fallow this blood line. The blood line of Kings.

The evidence for this assertion being...?

On Google! search for it. I am not going to do that for you.

I did a Google search. I found nothing with any verifiable sources. What source did you use?

I never said anything about verifiable. No more then that most of the American presidents have royal blood.

Which should be verifiable. If it can't be verified, why believe it?

ETA: I'm not sure - do you actually believe this? Or did you just post it because it was a myth that you thought was interesting?

[edit on 3/2/2010 by Golden Boy]

Originally posted by Golden Boy

Originally posted by spy66

Originally posted by Golden Boy

Originally posted by spy66

Originally posted by Golden Boy

Originally posted by spy66
The American presidency seams to fallow this blood line. The blood line of Kings.

The evidence for this assertion being...?

On Google! search for it. I am not going to do that for you.

I did a Google search. I found nothing with any verifiable sources. What source did you use?

I never said anything about verifiable. No more then that most of the American presidents have royal blood.

Which should be verifiable. If it can't be verified, why believe it?

ETA: I'm not sure - do you actually believe this? Or did you just post it because it was a myth that you thought was interesting?

[edit on 3/2/2010 by Golden Boy]

I have never said i have believe in it. I read about it. That is totally different than believing in it.

I am reading about this, because i think this alternative version to our present day religion is a good read.

Edit to add: And i am speculating with possibilities that probably can't be verified.

[edit on 27.06.08 by spy66]

reply to post by Aeons

I am related to Ulysses Grant

So, this has what to do with the subject? 14th cousin twice removed is nothing in the scheme of things really.
Your grandmother is several times removed?how many times removed?

I never claimed that politicians and ex presidents are reptillians.

Its examing a possibilty of some kind of genetic experiment, with the elite bloodline or humans in general.

Its examining certain bloodlines that do go back through the ages and seem to have been in power through those ages and still are powerful, forget ya 14th cousins twice removed and all that and links to the plantengenet royal house that many presidents and people have a line of decent( the only source where common people can claim decent from royalty) so dont think your special!

I am on about Direct decendants. decendants that seem to have the power handed down to them because they was born in the direct family and seem to have a god given right to have dominion.
If you understand that, clearly you dont with your reply about the remark of asking me to call you a reptillian. You just dont grasp it it seems and just here to try and belittle and make fun of the subject.

Do some real research, not just glance at a thread and post and make fun.
Read some history books.

Direct decendants and a powerful bloodline have and are about have been through Royalty, Roman Empire, King of all kings of Israel, and perhaps further to the Nephilim where some kind of creation occured according to texts.
Ya know, the texts that say they came to earth that seeded with Earths women.

I have shown a really good source on this, maybe you just aint looked for it or dont want to.

Its not just one family either.
But yeh, go ahead and make comments that are just generalisations, thats ok.

And My point was someone said, "yeh everyone is related to everyone, dont get all excited about bloodlines,", just like a sweeping generalisation and trying to play it down when it seems they had no understanding what they was talking aboutr, so I pointed out the facts, yeh, if you go back at least Sixty Thousand years thats all our common ancestor.



[edit on 2-3-2010 by Sparkey76]

reply to post by Sparkey76


First you'd have to demonstrate that the Nephilim exist, which no one has ever managed to do.

We are all descended from a common ancestor. That makes us all related. That means looking for common "bloodlines" will yield positives for every test you perform, as we're all related.

The whole notion of special bloodlines is abject nonsense.

Fascinating.

You literally make no sense. Each sentence is cohesive, while having no overall logic to the posts you make.

And people actually continue to talk to you. Like what you are saying does make sense.

What does "direct descendent" mean to you exactly. There can be lots of direct descendents. What makes you think one group of direct descendents is chosen over another? You realize that the numbers of "direct descendents" is exponential don't you?

If you don't "believe" this stuff you are writing, what exactly are you trying to prove? You are insinuating, but what you are insinuating makes no sense. When questioned, you admit this, and then continue on.

How about I go further. I am descended also from a german princess. so now that's TWO direct descents I can tie to leadership positions that you think have some sort of potential tie to mysterious potential leadership lines that may or may not be controlled by aliens or underground reptiles, or illuminati lines that have some special genetic thing going on.

Exactly which codons should I look for? I have access to several areas of my DNA that have been run. And I've already spoken about my family having a heritable abherent Rh polymorphism. Would you like to identify for me exactly which special bits I should look at?

reply to post by davesidious


Yes science says we all have a common ancestor, but about 60k years ago, you just made a sweeping generalisation in an earlier post to dismiss this elite bloodline thing by saying we are all related.

First you'd have to demonstrate that the Nephilim exist

True and a good point, but from a very good source I posted earlier, it suggests lets say one family comes from the tribe of Dan, King Solomon ect ect, now that existed in History, now something somewhere is up because the Biblical texts claim that the Tribe of Dan comes from the Nephilim.

Coincidence or not but why is Gog and Magog Guardians of London?

So it suggests this is the case, but we must seperate myth and look for the truth.