It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Dock9
to ask that president to provide (long after he took office) a birth certificate
And one can't help suspecting that Obama's failure to provide this vital document
Which is why this thread continues to grow and why questions about Obama continue to be asked
Originally posted by Dock9
The important thing is, Obama jumps to attention when Israel clicks its fingers
You should be proud of having such an Israel-obedient servant as US president
And clothes hang nicely on him
So do you believe it unreasonable for the taxpaying public of the United States, plus members of the US military who risk losing their lives as result of a US presidents decisions
to ask that president to provide (long after he took office) a birth certificate and other documents such as the documentation required of ordinary US citizens when seeking a loan, or college entry, or a driving licence, passport, etc. ?
How then did he keep it a secret for so long? Did he not attend a US university? How was he admitted, and how could the university not have known he wasn't an American born citizen? Wouldn't this same university by now have admitted that he was not born inside the confines of the United States of America? I would think they would know.
Obama hasn't released all his records.
Originally posted by 814ck0u7
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
Birthers are very bitter individuals who repeat things they've heard from the right wing media. No one takes them seriously as they're extremely immature moronic beings.
Sometimes we all need to grow up..birthers don't know how to
gorehoundlarry, if the issue had anything to do with maturity or "growing up" then your statement might have some merit, but seeing as it doesnt, it would be awesome for you to shut the hell up.
not drawing any more correlation than the one on the surface, but no one took people who said the earth WASNT flat seriously either. i suppose my point is that it doesnt matter one iota who or what takes someone seriously, if there is a shred of doubt in the matter, then a shred of doubt there shall remain.
you coming in here and painting "birthers" with such a wide brush, calling them extremely immature moronic beings brands you as extremely immature and moronic, if nothing else. i would say that i cant believe you would do such a brash and stupid thing, but then again, i would be lying.... i not only believe it, i expected it.
Originally posted by Snarf
reply to post by Dramey
This will be my last post in this thread, some of you have taken it so entirely far off topic that it's laughable and pathetic.
This was about discovering whether or not Birthers suffer from advanced delusionary schizophrenia with involuntary narcissistic rage.
I presented my opinions, supported them with facts, and gave my argument.
You retort with name calling. Others demand to see my PhD and claim that they'll turn me into the police for "imitating a doctor" (Haha )
You completely avoid the topic and instead choose to talk about something else. Which suggests an immediate conclusion
All of your actions, and nearly every "Birther" post in this thread is doing nothing but supporting the OP
Believing in something that you cannot prove is called faith.
Believing in something, this vehemently, that can be, and has been, proven false with 100% certainty hints at mental instability. I don't say that as an insult, but i know you'll take it as one anyways.
Oh Well.
End.
Edit to add:
Thank you to everyone who thought they were so clever for pointing out that this came from Me, Myself, & Irene. Yes, yes it did, the idea for the disorder came from Me, Myself, & Irene. I never once claimed it came from any where else.
However, each individual part of the affliction is a real, medically classified mental illness. We all know that mental illnesses come in many forms. It is, therefore, theoretically possible to suffer from more than 1 illness. I just propose that a small group of people suffer from 3.
You can either debate that, or continue your off-topic yammering.
Its up to you. I've said my peace, lots of people have agreed with me.
I'm done here.
[edit on 3-2-2010 by Snarf]
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Dock9
So do you believe it unreasonable for the taxpaying public of the United States, plus members of the US military who risk losing their lives as result of a US presidents decisions
to ask that president to provide (long after he took office) a birth certificate and other documents such as the documentation required of ordinary US citizens when seeking a loan, or college entry, or a driving licence, passport, etc. ?
Ok, let me spell this out again for you. I have done this repeatedly in countless threads on this issue, but apparently you missed those threads.
When you go to the DMV and get your drivers licence, are you required to show your birth certificate to the 18 year old in the back of the line? No you don't, why? Because he is not the one that is giving you your drivers licence. You only need to show your proof to the people that are qualified and legally obligated to view it. Those are the DMV employees.
It's much the same with a candidate, they are required to prove to the Secretary of State in each state that they are qualified to be on the ballot and that is it. You as a normal citizen aren't in a position to ask for this documentation because you do not vote for the president. You vote for electors, and those electors vote for the president.
To take another one of your analogies if you were in a bank applying for a loan, do I as a customer of that bank have the right to demand to see your paperwork? I mean after all, a portion of my savings in that bank is going to go for your loan right? Doesn't quite work does it? I as another customer of your bank have no authority to demand your personal papers and effects for inspection. Thats thanks to the Bill of Rights and our Constitution. You have the right to protect your personal papers and effects from unreasonable searches and seizures. So does the President, when he gave out his COLB online for everyone to view, that was his choice, and he was free to do so. That was backed up by Hawaii and so the matter should be settled.
So yes, it is unreasonable for you to demand something that is protected under the Constitution, you probably aren't a document expert, you probably aren't a member of the electoral college, you probably aren't Nancy Pelosi. So in short yes you don't have standing to question where this person was born.
yes great point the potus has no obligation to the people simply to those in business with him
and people wonder why people question things in the american government
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
Originally posted by 814ck0u7
Originally posted by GorehoundLarry
Birthers are very bitter individuals who repeat things they've heard from the right wing media. No one takes them seriously as they're extremely immature moronic beings.
Sometimes we all need to grow up..birthers don't know how to
gorehoundlarry, if the issue had anything to do with maturity or "growing up" then your statement might have some merit, but seeing as it doesnt, it would be awesome for you to shut the hell up.
not drawing any more correlation than the one on the surface, but no one took people who said the earth WASNT flat seriously either. i suppose my point is that it doesnt matter one iota who or what takes someone seriously, if there is a shred of doubt in the matter, then a shred of doubt there shall remain.
you coming in here and painting "birthers" with such a wide brush, calling them extremely immature moronic beings brands you as extremely immature and moronic, if nothing else. i would say that i cant believe you would do such a brash and stupid thing, but then again, i would be lying.... i not only believe it, i expected it.
Actually, it has a lot to do with maturity. Birthers are folks who can't get over the fact they have a black DEMOCRAT in office. They live in a fantasy world where they think their president was born in another country. If he was white, there would be no debate regarding to citizenship. But these morons need something to cry about, don't they? If it's not this, then it's another.
Oh and I will not "shut the hell up." Just because you disagree with someone, doesn't mean they should be silenced. I think you proved part of my post to be quite accurate. Good job
Originally posted by Dramey
i question and point out why proof that has been supplied is invalid
and no one discusses that part,
and if i am considered a "birther" because i have decided to ask questions about a subject that hasnt gone away in half a year
then hell im damn proud to be considered a birther
at least it means i think and question things rather then take everyones word for everything
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Dramey
yes great point the potus has no obligation to the people simply to those in business with him
I am not talking about his policies, and his position on issues, or what he does while in office, I am talking about his personal papers and effects. Those are protected under the Constitution. It's really simple.
and people wonder why people question things in the american government
Questions are great, but when you get an answer, just because you don't like the answer don't assume that they gave a false answer.
Originally posted by dereks
Originally posted by Dramey
i question and point out why proof that has been supplied is invalid
and you are wrong, as has been shown, Obama's certificate IS valid....
and no one discusses that part,
It has been discussed, but you just ignore that....
any alterations invalidate this certificate
certificate no.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Dramey
and if i am considered a "birther" because i have decided to ask questions about a subject that hasnt gone away in half a year
then hell im damn proud to be considered a birther
at least it means i think and question things rather then take everyones word for everything
So basically you are saying you made up your mind already, and there is no proof that is good enough to change your mind on the subject.
Questioning things is great and all, but if you don't like the answer, it's not the persons fault that is answering you, it's your own. After all, you already have your mind made up about the issue.
Which is fine, I guess. It is your right to have made up your mind about a subject. Just don't expect the rest of us to be quiet while people prattle on with false evidence and pseudo news articles. Some of us don't take WND at their word.