It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marsvolta
that`s right, that students reasoning is only good for cheap laughs. a class clown.
" have you seen porf`s brains?" everyone laughs. there are quite a few people who have seen it. medical personnel for example. brains are available for everyone to go see in museums of natural sciences. has everyone seen God? is it available for everyone to go see it? please.
Perhaps he should've said 'Has anyone seen the Proffessors' mind? Sure, you can go to an autopsy table or natural science museum and see a brain, but that isn't the mind. That might be the home of the thought processes, but it isn't the mind.
Does that make it less spurious for you?
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
You do realize that evolution occurs in spurts, not a long, slow process, right? We've demonstrated many times in laboratory experiments that evolution is often a response to stress. We've also discovered several new species in the last 200 years or so, often with characteristics linking them to other nearby species and suggesting a recent evolutionary shift.
Why does it have to be an "entity"? Why can't we simply just admit (like most scientists do) that nature is incredibly versatile and we just don't know every precise answer yet? Does lack of evidence IMMEDIATELY have to point to a magical ghost in the sky?
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
do a little non-forum reading
Science is a wonderful thing when you decide to explore it a bit.
Originally posted by Dark Ghost
[
But where does this "stress" come from? I am aware of the purpose of adaptation, but what is its cause? Evolution - like religion - cannot explain how the very first type of matter came into existence.
I was using "entity" in the very broad sense, not referring to a specific "thing" but rather something(s) beyond my comprehension. I agree that we don't have the answers. One of the reasons people "point to a magical ghost in the sky" is because we are curious beings and the thought that we have no purpose or reason for being here scares us deeply. For some it is a coping mechanism to deal with the fact that they don't know why they are here or what they should be doing.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
do a little non-forum reading
Science is a wonderful thing when you decide to explore it a bit.
What does this have to do with the Conversation we were just having?
I asked a question regarding my analogy. I´ll ask again: What "caused" the death of the Bug?
[edit on 2-2-2010 by Skyfloating]
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
I'll answer that when you answer my question regarding macroevolution and the evidence for it. I don't like to move on to other topics before having finished addressing the previous. Switching topics is a common stall tactic of those with weak arguments, so I would prefer you didn't do that.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
You asked how this relates to macroevolution, and I referred you to my previous post which gave three examples of macroevolution in the recent geologic era.
You then post an inane question about an apple squashing a bug, which is an oversimplification of directed and non-directed evolution. Again, this is basic science.
I'll ask once more, please address the examples of macroevolution I provided prior to switching topics. Otherwise, I'll assume you have no answer.
It's also interesting to note that I looked at your post history and it seems you are more willing to believe in "psycho-spiritual time travel" than basic tenets of molecular biology.
We observe evolution everyday and can stimulate its occurrence in the laboratory in bacteria. As for macroeveolution, we have countless fossils and even living examples. One would be the salamanders living around the grand canyon. There are several zones of a given width around the canyon. Only adjacent zones can interbreed. while those zones with one intervening zone cannot. This is due to a geographic separation becoming large enough that the species evolved differently and no longer have genes similar enough to produce viable offspring.
We've also discovered several new species in the last 200 years or so, often with characteristics linking them to other nearby species and suggesting a recent evolutionary shift.
Research the lion populations of central Africa, the finches of the Galapagos, or the salamanders of the Grand Canyon. All of these are recent evolutionary changes.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by Moonsouljah
Im sure he says god tells him all sorts of stuff. At the top of every religion there is always a liar shoveling %^&$ into the ears of their believers. Its a pitty god does nothing. O right, its satans fault.....