Truther Movement Can't Be Stopped

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
reply to post by K J Gunderson

 

Whatever. You think nobody ever claims that mininukes or beam weapons were used on the WTC on 9/11. Perhaps you doubt the existence of "no planers" as well.

What exactly is wrong with you? Is it that you can not read or do you suffer some mental capacity diminishing illness? Why should I have to repeat more than once what I am saying in a written forum? You can read over and over again if you are having trouble understanding.

I never once said that there 0 people like this on the planet. I have actually been very clear about this and you just keep ignoring it. My point was that they are not very active on ATS and not active at all in any of the threads I am participating in. Why is it tossed around as an accusation here? Why do I keep reading it being tossed around to discredit people that are not saying those things?

If you cannot understand this time, just be quiet because I will just be putting you on ignore. I am really sick of having to repeat myself because you all cannot be bothered to read what you reply to. Either get it right it stay the hell out of it.

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
In fact all of these are part of the Truth Movement - admittedly on its fringes, but still there. Your claim that they don't exist is risible.

www.checktheevidence.co.uk...

Not ATS

www.drjudywood.com...

Not ATS

www.nomoregames.net...

Not ATS

As for their reception here

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Several posters seem to agree with them. If you can be bothered you can check more. Though I doubt you will, since your attitude to evidence you don't agree with is apparently to pretend it doesn't exist. Wonder why you're a Truther?

Not a thread I have participated in. This only backs up exactly what I said. Had you bothered to have anyone explain to you what my words meant, you would see you just proved exactly what I said.

NICE JOB!

Click here to learn more about this warning.

You asked

You keep bringing this up as if it were somehow signifigant. Where are the people talking about mini-nukes, invisible explosives, beam weapons, etc?

You made no mention of ATS. And so I've shown you them. They're on the internet. Claiming insane nonsense. And you can't just pretend they don't exist because they make you look like a fool by association.

You continued:

Where are these people? Please help me out and show me where people are making those claims or stop referring to them.

You were helped out. You didn't like it. You stuck your head in the sand.

Even shown a thread here, on ATS, where members - "Truthers" - speak glowingly of Judy Wood's "work" (which is precisely what you claimed didn't exist) you reply

Not a thread I have participated in. This only backs up exactly what I said.

Now you have to participate in something for it to exist? That truly is a sign of egomania. And you have the temerity to accuse me of having a "mental disease"

Click here to learn more about this warning.

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
You saw the BBC report on TV? You seem to think it's credible, in that it actually happened.

I never stated anything about the BBC report.

It seems to me that the early report is actually evidence that explosives weren't used.

As Chief Hayden stated they were worried about fire jumping to other buildings, remember they were running out of water.

There is even a video of workers comming out of the safety zone stating the building is comming down.

Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
You saw the BBC report on TV? You seem to think it's credible, in that it actually happened.

I never stated anything about the BBC report.

It seems to me that the early report is actually evidence that explosives weren't used.

As Chief Hayden stated they were worried about fire jumping to other buildings, remember they were running out of water.

There is even a video of workers comming out of the safety zone stating the building is comming down.

I'm sorry but I don't understand what you mean.

My point is that if you were criminally blowing up a building and covering it up you would be unlikely to brief the media about it.

Why not just let it come down and then have them report it?

And surely workers coming out saying the building is "coming down" is further evidence for

-- no CD

-- why the media reported it early

?

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
My point is that if you were criminally blowing up a building and covering it up you would be unlikely to brief the media about it.

They are not criminally blowing up a building. Thy are bringing it down to keep fire from spreading to other buildings and so it does not damage other buildings from collapsing on its own.

reply to post by REMISNE

It's both.When the explosives were planted it was to minimize damage from a toppling tower. But the use it was put to in the spectacle of 9-11 was treasonous murder.With a cover up and the cherry of lucky larry getting a settlement,despite ARSON.

Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
My point is that if you were criminally blowing up a building and covering it up you would be unlikely to brief the media about it.

They are not criminally blowing up a building. Thy are bringing it down to keep fire from spreading to other buildings and so it does not damage other buildings from collapsing on its own.

If they intentionally blew up a building with people still inside and then lied about it, that seems rather criminal to me no matter what justification you have for it. Choosing buildings over humans is criminal.

Originally posted by REMISNE

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
My point is that if you were criminally blowing up a building and covering it up you would be unlikely to brief the media about it.

They are not criminally blowing up a building. Thy are bringing it down to keep fire from spreading to other buildings and so it does not damage other buildings from collapsing on its own.

So why haven't the admitted it? It's you who is fond of saying that "9/11 is a criminal investigation". If they aren't acting at least nefariously then why haven't they come clean?

As they haven't we can probably assume that they at least think they have done something worth covering up. And if they were trying to keep the coverup secret why would they tell the media about it?

I repeat, why not just let the building fall and then allow the media to report on it as normal? This is always met with deafening silence.

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
If they intentionally blew up a building with people still inside and then lied about it, that seems rather criminal to me no matter what justification you have for it. Choosing buildings over humans is criminal.

But there was no one inside the building. What firemen were in the building were evacuated hours before the building was brought down.

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade
So why haven't the admitted it?

Thats the million dollar question and why we need to do research, send FOIA requests to find the truth.

reply to post by REMISNE


You're not making much sense. You don't think that if "they" blew up building seven and covered it up then they're guilty of a criminal act - or at least one that is highly immoral?

And why do you think they announced it to the media? Why not, once again, just let the building fall down?

Originally posted by REMISNE

But there was no one inside the building. What firemen were in the building were evacuated hours before the building was brought down.

Well if you are only talking about building 7 then it was still a crime. There was an aftermath. There was the debris people were breathing in. Whoever took the building down is responsible for that. Aside from the criminal act that was the EPA declaring the air safe to breath, there were the people caught up in the initial pyroclastic cloud. All of these people were harmed by the actions of the people who took the buildings down. Here in America, if you demolish a building, people get hurt, and you lie about it...that is a criminal act.

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
Here in America, if you demolish a building, people get hurt, and you lie about it...that is a criminal act.

Except that the terrorists that caused the buildings to come down are all dead... so how could they lie about it? Just another "truther" who is very confused!

Originally posted by dereks
Except that the terrorists that caused the buildings to come down are all dead... so how could they lie about it? Just another "truther" who is very confused!

You are either braindead or a troll. Please identify so I know whether or not to put you on ignore and get it over with. My response was to someone else about a specific statement in regard to the idea that the building was demolished by someone other than terrorists. If you can not follow along, please do not respond. There is a reason I was not talking to you. There is a thing called context. Look into it. My response was to a specific claim that did not include terrorists. If you want to argue about the terrorists, go back to the person making the claim and tell them. Please do not respond to me with stupidity.

"Except that the terrorists that caused the buildings to come down are all dead... so how could they lie about it? Just another "truther" who is very confused!"

Hey buddy, KJ was speaking hypothetically, something which obviously "confused" you. You should try taking a reading comprehension course or, at the very least, opening up a dictionary once in a while.

Originally posted by K J Gunderson
to the idea that the building was demolished by someone other than terrorists.

Except only braindead "truthers" like you believe that, along with the other "truther" conspiracy theories, like pods on aircraft, beam weapons, nuclear weapons being used, invisible silent explosives etc.

Originally posted by dereks
Except only braindead "truthers" like you believe that, along with the other "truther" conspiracy theories, like pods on aircraft, beam weapons, nuclear weapons being used, invisible silent explosives etc.

...and with that nonsense, you vanish.