Royal Society Meet to Discuss if Extra-Terrestrials are Here on Earth

www.timesonline.co.uk...



[edit on 25-1-2010 by ufo reality]

reply to post by ProRipp
Well at least the story is about right, you have to expect The Sun aka New york post aka.... to stick in a nice flying saucer. Come to think of it they might just be right this time!

reply to post by MavRck


STAR

I enjoyed and shared these videos!!!! keep'em coming!

Yes I definately know something is bout to go down...DISCLOSURE....Maybe this will be what the President addresses Wednesday night in the State of the Union Address (probably not) but he should...i am going to try to watch the Royal Committee meeting on the interent tonight.

reply to post by Itop1
I agree, although more like on "a need to know basis" or like stuff simply left out. I remember as a kid when Sputnik went up and there was a time "it" was visible and I saw it plus a couple of other things which together looked more like a triangle or rather three points of light of different values, and I used to wonder about that until years later I found out that there was three vehicles, Sputnik, which was tiny and dim, the rocket stage, which was deliberately shiny and bright, and the protective fairing some where in between. But for years at school and in the press the only thing we were supposed to see was Sputnik, which was most likely the hardest thing to see. That's how mysteries like the black knight spring up and get carried forward. Lack of knowledge, often deliberate.

If aliens were here we'd know about it! i dont believe they live with us but do think they are out there, maybe to awaiting disclosure!

reply to post by ButterCookie


Obama's speech is on this Wednesday? I thought there wasn't a date set? Wait..the date...it's the same date Wilcock predicted, only a few months later..what if he meant now and the november date was just a false test?..hm..also, it's exactly the next day after the royal society conference ends...hm... *crosses fingers*

Originally posted by HalexandriaAngel
Ummm, I think we should recall what goes on at the University of Arizona.... Mars Explorer ring any bells?

Yep, I am in a bit of a shock at the moment, for 3 reasons.

1. To even spew by accident anything at all to the public that anyone in government is actually considering aliens being among us, is both dangerous and extremely alarming. This would not happen under any circumstances unless they are intending some type of disclosure in the near future and in a big way. Totally skipping all the disclosure understandings for the people of the world, moving us to the ultimate in fear in one fail swoop. Now whether it is accurate or a staged perception that we will be forced (one way or another) to believe in, is another question that will never be answered. hehe

No, no, no and no. 20 years ago the number of planets around remote stars was KNOWN to be zero and thus this led to an estimate of the probability of life elsewhere being low (it does need a large dose of usual human arrogance!). However we now have over 400 planets discovered and this then means the probability of life shoots up quite considerably. All the royal society is doing is putting the discussion of alien life back on the table without having journalists giggling and making fun......which ironically enough is exactly what happened yesterday morning when they interviewed a guy from the royal society on the today news programme.

Aliens are still a joke in the mainstream and this has to stop......that's all. No conspiracy or dreadful consequence or the end of the world or....blah blah blah.

Lets not forget, yours and everyone elses comments in this thread is just purely oppinion, we dont know their reason for this meeting, why now and why at all? and why with nasa? why would they waste time if this subject of aliens were totally redundant?.
Im sure nasa would have 100 better things to be doing if there wasnt any truth in this subject.
Otherwise it would be like calling a meeting to see if Santa Clause was real, get my drift?

Originally posted by On the Edge
Very curious,indeed!

"Disclosure" is not something I'm looking forward to!

(Disclosure will be only what they want us to believe,for their own reasons.)

Your right about that.

Lady's and Gentlemen ALIENS DO NOT EXIST. Read what the Book of Enoch has to say about The Watchers. They are Gods being sons of God himself.

Watchers are 8-9ft tall reptilians with two legs and wings. Like Angels but not the same. They can take on ANY form they wish.

They have bio-engineered the Grey's and cloned them to FOOL YOU.

The evil Watchers here on earth number 200. They have fooled our governments into believing their, "we are E.T. and we need a home crap" and now most of the population is ready to bow down to the evil ones.

They want total dominion over us and earth. Think I'm wrong then how do they mate? They have no sex organs. They also communicate by reading your mind, something only a spirit would need to do.

This is the GREAT DECEPTION people. This is the only and best way for the evil Watchers with their leader Azazel to take over earth.

Satan deceives the whole world (Rev 12:9), and "The whole world lieth in the evil one" (I John 5:19).

www.michaelsheiser.com...
Proof, Here is your Roswell UFO!!!!

ROSWELL AND OPERATION PAPERCLIP

The view taken in The Facade is that the Roswell crash of July 2, 1947 was in fact a PAPERCLIP accident. Typically, one side of the Roswell case argues that nothing but a weather balloon crashed that day, while the other side insists that only a MOGUL balloon was recovered. The Facade argues that the data on both sides is valid, but needs a completely different context and approach. As the de-classified memo on the right--dated July 8, 1947--clearly shows, a disk "suspended from a balloon by cable" was really what was recovered. The photo on the left (from a later date) is truly worth a thousand words of description. The Facade argues that the object recovered at Roswell was an experimental craft modeled after flying disks designed during WWII by Nazi engineers. Under OPERATION: PAPERCLIP, the designs and the know-how were exported to the U.S. via some of the same Nazi technicians who had begun the project in Germany. There was, therefore, some sort of connection between MAJESTIC-12 and PAPERCLIP. The Facade further argues that the bodies recovered at the crash were human unfortunates (Mongoloids, Asians, progeria victims, etc.) deemed "worthy" of the kind of human experimentation required for testing high altitude craft. For some documentation of these points, see the links.

1946 report cover documenting US military use of Nazi flying craft technology prior to Roswell.

Documentation on "human mutations" (human unfortunates like mongoloid children, progeria victims - mistaken for aliens at Roswell) is provided in Nick Redfern's new book Body Snatchers in the Desert. Click here for Mike's review of Nick Redfern's book.

Documentation in general of US human experimentation

Originally posted by Itop1

Sorry but your wrong, taken from the royal society website, this is as close to the truth as you will get to what they will dicuss

ideas of what form an alien intelligence might take, how it might try to communicate with us, and how we should respond if we ever do make contact.

talk to microbes shell we like total psychooaths, sorry, this is the real deal ,whether you like it or not, not microbes, real walking talking aliens, (thats if they can talk ofc, might not have mouths)

No, you're still not understanding my original point. Again, you guys are acting like these scientists know about a certain race walking amongst us as we speak. All they are doing, is theorizing about life outside of our own planet. Of course they're going to postulate different ways that these beings could exist, and the reason for that, is to figure out if we need to actually be gaining their(ET) attention. The reason for that, is analogous to how humans behave, and this is known to most, that humans are still very hostile and territorial towards each other.

Scientists are very eager in finding life outside this planet, and the meeting is about the different ways in which we can actually find scientific proof to backup those claims. They are realizing that SETI has been nothing but a waist of time, and if we are going to make a discovery, it may not be with SETI, but it could be in finding ET-microbial life. When they're talking about aliens that could look/act humanoid, is when they're trying to find planets similar to ours. Which, is another way in finding aliens, but at the same time, if they happen to be more advanced, then trying to communicate could actual prove more fatal, as we could stimulate attention upon ourselves to a potentially hostile society.

And, while this is all fun and dandy, again, this is all just theorizing upon the assumptions. You guys are spinning this like it's fact. It seems ATS has turned more into a gossip tabloid. It's almost the same thing when you see a star like Brittany Spears out talking to some guy, then someone takes a picture, and starts saying she is married to the fella, when in fact, it was just some random guy in the picture. You guys are making more of a mockery out of Ufology, by making such claims, and twisting these assumptions/theories around as fact. This is all just theorizing, and you guys are acting like aliens are walking around on this planet, cooking your McDonalds for you.

[edit on 25-1-2010 by TravisT]

reply to post by TravisT


Well I think that when representatives from Nasa, the European Space Agency and the UN Office for Outer Space Affairs and Lord Rees (President of the Royal Society and Astronomer Royal) get together to discuss various things including"how human beings might respond to the discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence", I think it is inevitable that there would be this kind of talk considering this a conspiracy theory based website.

Originally posted by FermiFlux
reply to post by TravisT

 

Well I think that when representatives from Nasa, the European Space Agency and the UN Office for Outer Space Affairs and Lord Rees (President of the Royal Society and Astronomer Royal) get together to discuss various things including"how human beings might respond to the discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence", I think it is inevitable that there would be this kind of talk considering this a conspiracy theory based website.

Yeah, but at the same time, there is no conspiracy. You can view/listen to the conference for free, and they have already told us what some of the points of conversation will include. If it was some "hush hush" meeting, I could understand the heir of mystery/conspiracy, but this is blatantly obvious.

Again, my point was that these scientist aren't saying they know of an alien race amongst us, they're merely theorizing on the assumption of intelligent life outside this planet. That's how the scientific method work, you have a hypothesis, and then you try to back up the claims, until you reach a verdict.

[edit on 25-1-2010 by TravisT]

Now that's quite interesting...

The Royal Society is a very reputable organization of scholars which will undoubtedly be taken seriously by the science community if there is any statement being made about ET life on Earth, while they are not too high-profile for attracting to much attention from the media and generate a frenzy that the government wouldn't like. Seems like a perfect candidate for alien disclosure to take a new ground. They probably won't admit that there is alien life on Earth, but they might come up with some very saucy disclosures tied to the matter, which will leave not much for the imagination.

One chance out of two that there is going to be some major announcement during this conference. Keep a very close eye on it, folks... this is a potential trigger to something big.

And Travis...

As the article says, the conference will be focused around the presence of "extraterrestrial life on Earth". It's not about SETI or the search of foreign organism elsewhere in the Galaxy. While the Times mostly refers to issues of micro-organisms of extraterrestrial origins having developed on Earth, feeding from alternative resources, it doesn't say anywhere that other themes will not be talked about. But even a recognition that there ARE primitive alien life forms that existed on this planet and have gone under the radar for all this time is already a groundbreaking statement.

Please don't go trigger happy on UFO disclosure debunking.

I do hope they don't deduce that these "Aliens amongst us" carries a virus, hostile intent, or something, then accuse people who have a certain physiological or psychological characteristic. Sort of a depopulation plan. Only in this case, ordinary folks like you and me will be voluntarily doing the depopulation for them.

Originally posted by Echtelion
And Travis...

As the article says, the conference will be focused around the presence of "extraterrestrial life on Earth". It's not about SETI or the search of foreign organism elsewhere in the Galaxy.

Have you not even kept up with what this entire conferences is about? It has a multiple amount of ideas/theories. I never said it was about SETI, but a theme of how SETI was never really a contributing factor to the finding of Extraterrestrial lifeforms, and how scientist are looking to alternative means to search for other lifeforms, along with the repercussions for doing so. Is it that hard to figure out what the articles are saying, along with my posts?

While the Times mostly refers to issues of micro-organisms of extraterrestrial origins having developed on Earth, feeding from alternative resources, it doesn't say anywhere that other themes will not be talked about. But even a recognition that there ARE primitive alien life forms that existed on this planet and have gone under the radar for all this time is already a groundbreaking statement.

Please don't go trigger happy on UFO disclosure debunking.

What is your point exactly? It's like you haven't even read the article[s] correctly, and then you act like this wasn't my point to begin with! The scientist are THEORIZING on alternative means to look for Extraterrestrial life. They HAVEN'T' proven that there are ET-microbial life on this planet, let alone, any planet, and AGAIN, are theorizing that it may be smarter to look towards other avenues, instead of using radio telescope data(SETI).

My point, was you guys need to stop acting like scientist are saying that hey have proven that there is life outside of this planet, or have found ET-microbes on this planet, when they're just theorizing on this idea. It's almost like saying you know that there's ET-life, because Star Trek said so. Either way, it's still theory and speculation. Jessh!

Please don't go trigger happy on UFO disclosure.

[edit on 25-1-2010 by TravisT]

reply to post by TravisT


Travis, be honest.

You came in here like a few others to giggle at those who you thought were being silly and reading too much into what this conference was going to discuss. Then others showed with references to the article and content from the Royal Society's website that you were wrong in your criticism and in limiting the scope of the article and the conference it described. You weren't well informed enough when you prematurely made your rather condescending judgement - littered with laughing and rolling eyed smilies - that members were being gullible and reading too much into what the conference might deal with.

You were wrong. We're not missing your point. You're switching it. You're equivocating.

Dude, just take it on the chin and move on and maybe be a bit slower on the snicker trigger next time, at least until you know all the facts.


[edit on 25-1-2010 by Malcram]

The following information below may be of interest?

Dr. Roger Leir alien implant technology

Surgically removed implant.....unknown metal.....

The above was posted for informational/evaluational purposes.
Though an implant has been found in different human beings, the same technology is attempting to be brought in to practice among the NWO folk.

I believe ET's use these devices to learn more about the human experience than for negative purposes. The problem is this violates one's 'personal' space.

On what grounds would one find this acceptable, if at all?
If an implant was capable of transmitting data to a Source as well as improving one's cognitive functioning, should one accept the device?

I don't believe so since it would be a violation to One's Sovereignty as a Being. Is one Sovereign? I suppose this is the question. If one is truely a sovereign being, I have found very few examples.....in my travels.

The word sheeple comes to mind though it appears to be over-used. The word is actually beginning to annoy many people though this could be attributed to the feeling of helplessness one has in present 'society'.

Nanotechnological applications for artificial neuro-networks is a trend that could benefit one with improved cognitive function.....though could very well compromise their 'independence' as well. It could possibly be misused for obvious reasons.

This sort of technological engineering should be 'watched' very carefully and the public has a Right to know how these tax dollars are being used for 'their' benefit.

Highly evolved extra terrestrials or rather 'Angels' would be more inclined to influence one when One requests assistance (via~free-will) provided that they were worthy of attention. I believe 'apex' knowledge is attainable for those with good intentions. Evolution of a species to a 'new' Creation is the End. This should be obvious.

It should seem reasonable that an extra terrestrial Creator would be encouraged to see a human creation improve their Being. To be at One with a Creator is the ultimate goal. To be as a Creator and witness One's creation is among the greatest and divine gifts of the cosmos.



[edit on 26-1-2010 by Perseus Apex]

If I were an extra terrestrial or influenced by one and desired a residual cash income for expenses while here on terra I suppose I would invest in something such as:

"Proshares Ultrashort Financials", ticker SKF.
If one purchased a call option [preferrably a multi-month contractually structured strategy (ask broker)], on the above it could only increase one's payout E'xponentially.

The strategy of course is a reflection.....of the times we are in.
If you are meant to act on this idea, perhaps you were meant to act on this idea.

Yeh, I could be wrong?
Regardless, I mean well.
This is what matters.

The term "Sense of Humor" seems to be vanishing without hum'our.
.....though One may 'choose' Light unto darkness.



[edit on 26-1-2010 by Perseus Apex]

The conference has ended, hasn't it? Any news what they came up with, some conclusions or what the UN guy said in the last session ? Or is it still running?

[edit on 26/1/10 by Cybernet]