It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Full story is at this link.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Lillydale
????????????
So now, when the going gets tough, it's time to shoot the messenger????
OK...I see clearly now. "Truth" isn't the goal here. Is it?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Lillydale
Ihad----word I meant here was "hate"---- to be crass....there are portions in that LINK if you would just read it...I thought better against actually copying them and pasting in the thread.
It is quite gruesome....the descriptions of body parts. YOU SEE, in an event such as this, the bodies (stop reading here if you're squeamish)....
Originally posted by lycopersicum
reply to post by Lillydale
Yeah , and remember it had ,underground road to the air port, and all over NYC ,,just saying ,
With your mind ,and the way you think, and you seem to be very articulate,and seem to be able to type well,I suck at it.
Would love, maybe for you to ponder on it, if you know what i meam
EDIT to add .
Sorry for interrupting you and weedwacks discussion.
[edit on 30-9-2009 by lycopersicum]
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by scott3x
Originally posted by LightFantastic
Even if the passengers were turned into a red patch in the debris by the collision, there would still be viable DNA found. DNA is very hardy.
Where did you get this notion that DNA is hardy?
Come on, it must be hardy if it can survive the circumstances that will completely disintegrate an entire plane.
Originally posted by Lillydale
But anyway, recently I was reading about how the DNA had to be hardy because the sea creatures that live on volcano shafts in the Ocean. What they left out was that DNA is plenty hardy while it is still part of a living organism. Apparently certain proteins the body produces helps to protect DNA from things like heat. The problem is that when people die, their body stops generating these proteins.
My problem is not so much with the fact that any DNA collection from the Pentagon "crash" scene is laughable at best. I do not understand why when these people pushing this story do not acknowledge that according to those DNA tests they want to cite as proof, no Arab men were found.
Originally posted by Lillydale
It seems to me that either there was no DNA to collect or there was but the plane was not hijacked by 5 Arab men. Either way doesn't the OS fall apart?
Originally posted by scott3x
You don't honestly believe -I- think that the plane even -hit- the pentagon, do you?
Originally posted by Lillydale
Originally posted by scott3x
You don't honestly believe -I- think that the plane even -hit- the pentagon, do you?
No, I was using sarcasm. I was hoping the context given by the rest of my post would make that apparent. My apologies.
Originally posted by Lillydale
You do not honestly believe I think the DNA was hardier than EVERYTHING ELSE on, in, and part of the plane do you?
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by Lillydale
Photos of bodies from the Pentagon. These were not "vaporized" nor was the airplane. Perhaps you misread that part.
911research.wtc7.net...
...the Official Autopsy reports claim no Arab men - but all the terrorists were identified by DNA, including the alive ones.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Lillydale
"confuse and deflect"??? Is that what YOU said? Wow!
SO....you wish to claim that from the DNA they can determine region of origin? Dr. Mengele, meet Lillydale.....
Earlier you said there was NO human remains (I believe you said "tissue") at the Pentagon, but NOW you are admitting they found DNA???
You really are either getting poor information from somewhere, and cannot see that it is contradictory, or else you actually cannot see the problems with your logic.
You dismiss actual accounts, because they are not up to your "standards", whatever THOSE are....simply astonishing.
Earlier in this thread I saw an external source snippet someone found about crematoria....but, you dismiss that?
In case you forgot, it had to do with procedures for processing the cremains at sufficiently high temperatures for sufficiently long times to meet certain standards. Anyway, the implication was that even in the fire of a crematorium, IF it isn't hot enough or long enough certain biological tissues may till survive the process.
I dare say a crematorium's furnace is hotter than found in the fires at the Pentagon...why not research that and 'debunk' me???
No.....it's certainly better to stick to ignorance, isn't it?
Practicing to be a trial lawyer someday, are you? Because twisting and dodging to the best of one's ability IS a tried and true courtroom tactic...at least, on TV courtroom dramas.
Source
But the core of the fire went on for days. Firefighters on the scene spoke of the [WWW]huge heat of the fire:
* "The firemen were appreciative, as the heat inside the building was, in their words, "unbelievable." It was reported that at least three of the fireman had to be given IV fluids due to the extreme heat" [WWW] Terry Morin
* "We're having a lot of trouble in there. It's about 3,000 degrees inside"
How hot does the oven get? Although there are several manufacturers of cremation units, the optimum temperature range is 1600 degrees to 1800 degrees Fahrenheit.
How long does it take to cremate a body? Cremating at the optimum temperature (1600 - 1800 degrees), the average weighted remains takes 2 to 2 1/2 hours. Several more hours may be required before the cremated remains are available to the family. Go To Top
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Lillydale
"confuse and deflect"??? Is that what YOU said? Wow!
...the Official Autopsy reports claim no Arab men - but all the terrorists were identified by DNA, including the alive ones.
SO....you wish to claim that from the DNA they can determine region of origin? Dr. Mengele, meet Lillydale.....