It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Pathos
I understand what you mean but it's a fine line from demanding people be constructive, to demanding certain economic output (production) in order to receive any form of care. Which would be a very Fascist idea..
I would never tolerate any form of Federal plan to begin with, allow the states to.. if you don't like what develops, move.
reply to post by open_eyeballs
I never called anyone a name except for calling the OP a degenerate and a vagabond.
as per the tenth amendment states...
Which is what I have been saying all along.. in many threads.. and I get the feeling no one knows what the 10th amendment says..
Originally posted by king9072
Im Canadian. Had health care my entire life. Been to the hospital tens of times in my life either myself, a family member or a friend.
Best part, is when you leave, and it costs you nothing. Ever.
Wrathful Wade Rathke
By Matthew Vadum on 7.16.09 @ 6:07AM
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) founder Wade Rathke wants to use the Internet to overthrow the capitalist system.
He said so in his new book, Citizen Wealth: Winning the Campaign to Save Working Families, in which he serves up some community organizing war stories, and offers his thoughts on the future of organizing.
Rathke, a pioneer of the so-called welfare rights movement that aims to get Americans on welfare, devotes an entire chapter of his book to what he calls "The 'Maximum Eligible Participation' Solution." It is a strategy for orchestrated crisis that savvy leftist groups across America are likely to embrace.
"[I]t is hard to believe that we cannot assemble the troops to mount a campaign for maximum eligible participation that harvests the opportunities and dollars already available if we could achieve full utilization of existing programs," he writes.
Rathke acknowledges his support for the Cloward-Piven Strategy, an approach to radical social and political change articulated by Marxist university professors Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven in a 1966 Nation article, "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty." The two academics called for "a massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls" in an effort to overwhelm the system. [Italics in original.]
The strategy helped to bankrupt New York City in 1975. Years later, the Big Apple's mayor, Rudy Giuliani, denounced the academic activists by name.
In the Nation article, Cloward and Piven made it clear that they were irritated that plenty of Americans legally eligible to receive forcibly redistributed wealth hadn't bothered to ask for handouts. "The discrepancy is not an accident stemming from bureaucratic inefficiency; rather, it is an integral feature of the welfare system which, if challenged, would precipitate a profound financial and political crisis."
In his book Rathke hails "Cloward and Piven's exciting call to arms." He notes that the activist group they created and that he organized for in the late 1960s, the now-defunct National Welfare Rights Organization, caused "a flood tide from its work that allowed many boats to rise, including the level of participation in government assistance programs."
spectator.org...
and my 9 month old child needs a doctor.
I'm more than happy to spend my tax money on medicaid, I know the majority of is is going towards people in my situation.
Best part, is when you leave, and it costs you nothing. Ever.
Originally posted by iamjesusphish
Alright I am very fed up with rich people that have great health care being enraged with the notion that they will not pay for another persons health care because it is socialist... I am 23 years old and have been on Medicaid since I was 18 and taking off my parents insurance. This is not because I don't work or pay taxes but simply because I can not afford private insurance.
Now first off I am a recovering addict and without medicaid I would have died when I overdosed in 2004. Without Medicaid I would have been pushed off to a hospital that could not treat my Pulmonary Edema. My life was saved because of government run health care.
I for one believe that every American citizens deserves to be insured. To any of you that think our country will be ruined because of this needs to be human for one second and think about their fellows humans. We are not enemies. We are the same as you except we are not as well off. I work just like you do I pay taxes just like you and I would want the same health insurance for you....
[edit on 15-8-2009 by iamjesusphish]
Originally posted by Tom192
I really don't get it...Maybe I am ignorant? I am 25 years old and have been working since i was 14. I live in the Boston, MA area and costs are high. I have a college degree and now I make about $55,000. I am certainly not rich as a lot of people in this salary range can appreciate. I have a health plan I pay about $40+ a week for. It covers what I need.
Now....Am I ignorant to say why can't others just work hard as I did to get myself out of the gutter (like I did), and get a job with insurance????
EDIT: I actually registered because of this thread. I have been reading many topics on this board for a couple years but this just kills me. To the OP, you did mess up, and now either you work a job that requires no skills or something right? Why punish those of us that worked hard through a trade or college and we are just getting by? Ot those that didn't have either but busted their butt the good old American way? Why should we pay more?
[edit on 15-8-2009 by Tom192]
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Tom192
Damn straight Tom... people refuse to recognize the Middle class, those making 40-100k a year will pay the biggest proportion of the taxes to fund these stupid programs.. only adding to the speedy decline of those individuals that prop up this country, and that are only scraping by in these hard economic times....
Obama could have had the decency to wait for an economic rebound THEN tax the hell out of us... it's like kicking a man while he's down and running off with his wallet..
PS welcome to ATS.
Originally posted by redhatty
reply to post by iamjesusphish
Oh no, far from ignorant. I have seen many a people who are addicted to pharma drugs. It is still a CHOICE you made.
Just because a pain killer is prescribed does NOT MEAN you HAVE to take it. There are ways to learn to deal with pain that can reduce the amount of drugs you need to manage it, but again, that too is a CHOICE.
You choose to pollute your body, with whatever substance, legally prescribed or not, rather than choosing to find a healthier alternative.
And you realize that you simply further my point. Once again you reinforce how your bad choices are subsidized by my tax dollars, as I (and other taxed americans) paid not only for the doctor visits, but for your prescriptions too. Our money fed your addiction.
having someone come right out and state that you are an example of the nation of leeches IS SUPPOSED TO BOTHER YOU, but you go ahead, defend your position and rationalize away the FACT that you are an example of an American Leech.
Because as long as it makes YOU feel better, it's all okay, right??
No, I did not miss that you say you are a tax PAYING citizen. So tell me, did you get a refund last year or did you have to write a check and actually PAY taxes with your return??
There is a difference in case you didn't know. Refund means the .gov only BORROWED your money for a while. Having a tax liability higher than the money they take out of your paycheck is being a REAL taxpayer.
[edit on 8/15/09 by redhatty]
Originally posted by Twilly
Medicare and Medicad were put in place because everyone gets down on their luck sometimes, and needs help. But the leeches that stay on it for years are the ones we need to address.
OP, Do you have pay TV? A Car? Internet access?
Yeah, I thought so, you made a CHOICE to avoid paying health care, you can afford it, but CHOOSE not to. And why not, If I will pay it for you.
I've got no problem helping someone else up when their down. But you need to walk on your own.