It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Leto
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by Zenagain
Had that kid attempted to defend himself, what do you think would have happened? It would have been him against a crowd. He obviously felt he had no recourse...and I find that very sad, who knows what that kid could have become, had someone amongst his peers stepped forward and said, "Enough".
I hope those consciouncless bastards live long lives so that they can come to realize just what it is they did...and the peer group that didn't step up to help this kid.
Had the kid attempted to defend himself chances are the bullies would leave him alone.
Originally posted by andy1033
Originally posted by Leto
Had the kid attempted to defend himself chances are the bullies would leave him alone.
How can you say that, do people stop bullying people because the victim stands up, i doubt it seriously.
Thats a myth that standing upto bullies in groups stop bullying. One person against a group, and especially that he was 11.
Originally posted by Leto
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by Leto
That's a crock of poo. Makes for a great movie though...
There would have been a bullie pile all over that kid. Only your delusions say otherwise. Gangs like that are like sharks, once blood is spilled they all pile in...
Yes sharks get in a frenzy when they smell blood which is why it is vital that you never show weakness. If you don't bleed, if you defend yourself, the sharks will find weaker prey.
Originally posted by alphabetaone
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by alphabetaone
Did you even bother to read my post? Clearly you missed a word or two...
I said he felt he had no recourse. Not that there wasn't.
No, I clearly missed nothing at all. You can't even state as much, you can allude that PERHAPS he felt as though he had no recourse, but you can not state that with even the slightest bit of certainty.
Originally posted by jfj123
Just curious but what do you think that suicide was about? Do you think he was so happy he just couldn't take it anymore?
What would be the motivation for this child to commit suicide unless he did indeed feel hopeless? Please use common sense when responding or please don't respond.
Originally posted by alphabetaone
Originally posted by jfj123
Just curious but what do you think that suicide was about? Do you think he was so happy he just couldn't take it anymore?
What would be the motivation for this child to commit suicide unless he did indeed feel hopeless? Please use common sense when responding or please don't respond.
It's seems MY common sense is on solid ground, considering I'm more than willing to weigh several possibilities for why this could have come about, as opposed to your narrow vision.
You seem to believe that YOU are the only one with the correct set of circumstances, YOU are the only one with the solution, and YOU are the only one who knows the possible outcome.
You know what *I* think?
I think that you should re-read your OWN avatar..."Convictions are more dangerous foes of the truth than lies"....whys that?
Because it seems someone like yourself who is SO convinced that THEY know everything about a topic, blind themselves to other possibilities, even at the expense of the truth.
AB1
How can you say that, do people stop bullying people because the victim stands up, i doubt it seriously.
Thats a myth that standing upto bullies in groups stop bullying. One person against a group, and especially that he was 11.
Originally posted by alphabetaone
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by alphabetaone
Did you even bother to read my post? Clearly you missed a word or two...
I said he felt he had no recourse. Not that there wasn't.
No, I clearly missed nothing at all. You can't even state as much, you can allude that PERHAPS he felt as though he had no recourse, but you can not state that with even the slightest bit of certainty.
AB1
A study published in Child Development magazine indicates that students who are bullied may be at a greater risk for developing antisocial behavior and depression.
And untreated depression is the number one cause for suicide. So, children who are bullied are at a risk for suicide.
Whereas, boys who were bullied were more likely to be depressed and exhibit antisocial behavior both at school and at home. And the boys who were depressed and/or antisocial in school actually attracted more bullying.
Most children that are bullied become depressed.
And untreated depression is the number one cause for suicide.
All children who are being bullied are at risk for dying by suicide.
A study published in Child Development magazine indicates that students who are bullied may be at a greater risk for developing antisocial behavior and depression.
And untreated depression is the number one cause for suicide. So, children who are bullied are at a risk for suicide.
Originally posted by NatalinaEx
For example, as I was perusing You Tube the other day, I noticed a vid from a 12 year old
Originally posted by alphabetaone
reply to post by jfj123
I don't have to name any possibilities at all for them to exist.
You know what, this back and forth nonsense is pointless because you see only one thing.
Ok you're right, you win, see ya around.
AB1