It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Monger
Originally posted by jd140
reply to post by MattMulder
If the fetus poses no health risk to the mother and the mother doesn't want the child what would be the harm of carrying it to term and finding adoptive parents for the newborn instead of aborting it?
Nine months of pain and discomfort. Mood instability, weight gain, not to mention a slew of other changes, some temporary and others permanant.
If an abortion isn't right for you, fine, nobody forces pro-lifers to get them. Those of us who believe in a woman's right to choose don't seek to force abortions upon you by law, I wish the same were true for the pro-life camp.
Originally posted by jd140
Originally posted by Monger
Originally posted by jd140
reply to post by MattMulder
If the fetus poses no health risk to the mother and the mother doesn't want the child what would be the harm of carrying it to term and finding adoptive parents for the newborn instead of aborting it?
Nine months of pain and discomfort. Mood instability, weight gain, not to mention a slew of other changes, some temporary and others permanant.
If an abortion isn't right for you, fine, nobody forces pro-lifers to get them. Those of us who believe in a woman's right to choose don't seek to force abortions upon you by law, I wish the same were true for the pro-life camp.
If you read my other posts I have stated that I don't force my opinion on anyone.
What my post that you replied to asked, if no health problems posed a risk why not adoption.
You failed to answer that with your answer of 9 months of discomfort.
I ask again and I am not forcing my opinion, just want an answer since you wanted to reply.
What is the harm in adoption if no health risk is a concern for the mother?
You don't have to reply if you don't want to, but if you do give a straight answer pleae.
The decision, if wrong, is something each woman who makes it will have to deal with between her and God.
Originally posted by Smack
I'm afraid you are wrong about that, but I might as well argue with you as to whether or not the sun is hot. It is a biological fact. Ask your Biology teacher.
But that isn't really what I was arguing to begin with. You said:
The only thing that will ever settle this argument is when science comes to a concensus and declares the moment life begins.....and society agrees with it. Until then, there is no chance at a viable solution.
That isn't the argument at all because there is scientific consensus that it does begin at fertilization. It couldn't happen before that.
Originally posted by skeptic1
Here is a little more on the scientific (and cultural and religious) views on when life begins.
There is no consensus, even (and especially) in the scientific community.
When does life begin?
However, understanding the basis for societal moral standards appears to be the key to discerning how to approach the question of when human life begins. Science has not been able to give a definitive answer to this question.
Originally posted by Benbennit
"Lets save babies because they're cute and cuddly the rest of human kind can go to hell because they're no-longer innocent."
they usually have a very comfortable western lifestyle with lots of food on the table and haven't gone through the horror of poverty, hunger, rape or drug addiction.
God loves you all even the ones having abortions right now and the doctors carrying them out. Peace.
Development of the embryo begins at Stage 1 when a sperm fertilizes an oocyte and together they form a zygote. [England, Marjorie A. Life Before Birth. 2nd ed. England: Mosby-Wolfe, 1996, p.31]
Human development begins after the union of male and female gametes or germ cells during a process known as fertilization (conception). "Fertilization is a sequence of events that begins with the contact of a sperm (spermatozoon) with a secondary oocyte (ovum) and ends with the fusion of their pronuclei (the haploid nuclei of the sperm and ovum) and the mingling of their chromosomes to form a new cell. This fertilized ovum, known as a zygote, is a large diploid cell that is the beginning, or primordium, of a human being.
[Moore, Keith L. Essentials of Human Embryology. Toronto: B.C. Decker Inc, 1988, p.2]
Embryo: the developing organism from the time of fertilization until significant differentiation has occurred, when the organism becomes known as a fetus. [Cloning Human Beings. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD: GPO, 1997, Appendix-2.]
Embryo: An organism in the earliest stage of development; in a man, from the time of conception to the end of the second month in the uterus.
[Dox, Ida G. et al. The Harper Collins Illustrated Medical Dictionary. New York: Harper Perennial, 1993, p. 146]
The development of a human being begins with fertilization, a process by which two highly specialized cells, the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female, unite to give rise to a new organism, the zygote. [Langman, Jan. Medical Embryology. 3rd edition. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1975, p. 3]