Alien Domes On The Moon? Let’s Set The Controversy to Rest!

Originally posted by depthoffield
Now why continue to repeating the same again and again and again?
I don't want to imagine that some guys here, basically in fact just continue to hunt clicks for thelivingmoon.

No need to be that way. There is nothing to gain by getting "hits" on thelivingmoon. In case you have not noticed, there is no ad, and therefore no revenue. It is all paid for out of Zorgons pocket.

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnow--OH also has anyone got the ULOs book by Allan Sturm from lunomaly.com... ?-- Is it worth the price? And this is the type of book you major moonie doctors should combine to create so I can buy a copy and be at peace.

He has a pdf version available for a mere $5.00. Seems reasonable to me considering "Dark Mission" fetches $50-$60 bucks

What us make a book?

If we did that the skeptics would shout "Yer only in it for the money, so your work doesn't count"

This was a nice subtle serving and hit.
Ok, i agree, now i'm conspiring a little.

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
No need to be that way. There is nothing to gain by getting "hits" on thelivingmoon. In case you have not noticed, there is no ad, and therefore no revenue. It is all paid for out of Zorgons pocket.

There are always reasons not known by the crowd for trying hard to get attention on a story, and there are always reasons of susceptibility. Anyway, this was my posibble wrong hunch seeing how bizar you guys helped yourselves to continue to push some good examples of aparent odd anomalies, but continue to sustain misleadings in the same time exampling too many "nothings" and pareidolia samples. Extraordinary claims needs strong evidence. Not pareidolia.





[edit on 5/1/09 by depthoffield]

Originally posted by easynow

this picture from Zond 3 has always intrigued me. i don't know what it is but it could be some type of Alien structure ?

www.greatdreams.com...

Where is the evidence in this picture?

reply to post by depthoffield



it's right there in the picture ...cant you see it ?

if it's something that's easy to explain then please do explain it.

if you can't then it could be a structure of somekind.

Originally posted by easynow


it's right there in the picture ...cant you see it ?

if it's something that's easy to explain then please do explain it.

if you can't then it could be a structure of somekind.

please show me first, because right now i don't see what is the anomaly, so that's why i asked you where is the anomaly.
Thank you.

reply to post by depthoffield


i don't know what it is

go look up Zond 3 photos and find out for yourself, then you will have your own opinion based on what you found thru research of this picture.


[edit on 5-1-2009 by easynow]

I ask you again to show which is the anomaly here. It may be kind from you to explain which is the anomaly if someone ask you, since you posted here that picture claiming you wonder about it and seeing "aliens structures" there.
Thanks again.

[edit on 5/1/09 by depthoffield]

[edit on 5/1/09 by depthoffield]

reply to post by depthoffield


if you can't already see there is something anomalous about this photo than me pointing to anything is not going to help. please stop asking me to point things out...it's unnecessary dialogue that is cluttering up this thread

go research the photo and then come back and give me your explanation of what's in this photo

also i never said it was definitely a structure...i said it could be and if it's on the Moon than it's Alien to this planet...thanks

Originally posted by depthoffield
I ask you again to show which is the anomaly here. It may be kind from you to explain which is the anomaly if someone ask you, since you posted here that picture claiming you wonder about it and seeing "aliens structures" there.
Thanks again.

[edit on 5/1/09 by depthoffield]

[edit on 5/1/09 by depthoffield]

Pardon me for a moment.

I find it amazing that we have a constant stream of new members who pursue obtuse methods of skepticism. I would suspect that you, like the countless that have come before you, will fade into obscurity soon enough.

You really don't see that there is a white patch rising above the surface? If you do not, then easynow is correct...not much help anyone can be to you.

Denying that it is there is silly. Instead, try to explain what we might be seeing.

Back to our regularly scheduled programming.

Originally posted by depthoffield

Originally posted by easynow

this picture from Zond 3 has always intrigued me. i don't know what it is but it could be some type of Alien structure ?

www.greatdreams.com...

Where is the evidence in this picture?

I would just like to point out that NOWHERE in the post did easynow use the word "evidence"...

Perhaps it is you, depthoffield, who suffers from a slight case of pareidolia here, since you see non-excisting words in other people's posts?

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan

You really don't see that there is a white patch rising above the surface? If you do not, then easynow is correct...not much help anyone can be to you.

Denying that it is there is silly. Instead, try to explain what we might be seeing.

Thanks for showing which is the anomaly, Bigfatfurrytexan. I understand now. (there were another aparent anomalies too for some eyes, but not wish to confuse things.)

But, you say that is a white patch rising abobe surface. Why that?

Could not just be a very enlarged photo taken from orbit, to the moon on the day-night boundary, where the sunlight fall tangent to the surface?
In this normal scenario, look what i see there:



The "B" may be a crater, with the central hole in shadow and only rims in light, and the "A" may be a diformed crater, or some elongated hills?

Is this wrong to see this? Why?



Added:
Of course Easynow don't use the word "evidence", he just "wonder it that could not be alien structure". I think just wondering is a subtle form of "gettin the idea". I should pay more attention at the words.
___

off-topic

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
I would suspect that you, like the countless that have come before you, will fade into obscurity soon enough.

It is very likely since i have allmost nothing to lose.


[edit on 5/1/09 by depthoffield]


[edit on 5/1/09 by depthoffield]

Mod Edit: Image Hotlinking – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 6/1/2009 by Mirthful Me]

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan

The source of that image seems to be this photo,
which seems to be a composite created from several of the original frames from Zond 3. Judging from the originals, quite a bit of processing was involved. There is no sign of the "dome" in the originals which are pretty horrible quality. My guess is that the processing and compositing introduced some artifacts. A rough size comparison to Mare Moscoviense would make the "dome" about 50 miles across.






[edit on 1/5/2009 by Phage]

reply to post by Phage


"Horrible quality" is an understatement! Those photos could just as well show a rotting orange!



But thanks for posting them, Phage.

Correction, got my directions crossed. It's Mare Orientale, which would make the "dome" even larger.

reply to post by Phage


Try this one




Lower right hand corner



Mod Edit: Image Hotlinking – Please Review This Link.


[edit on 6/1/2009 by Mirthful Me]

Originally posted by Intothepitwego

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
You really don't see that there is a white patch rising above the surface? If you do not, then easynow is correct...not much help anyone can be to you.

Denying that it is there is silly. Instead, try to explain what we might be seeing.

Back to our regularly scheduled programming.

I can clearly see gigantic purple unicorns. They are so obvious to me, I have no idea why all these skeptics are missing it. I guess if you cannot see the unicorns, then saddly there is nothing to be done for you. Denying they are there is silly. Instead, try to explain what we might be seeing.

I see your jumping from one anomolie thread to the other spouting dumb arse childish comments.

If you do not see anything in these types of discussions and can not give any positive input one way or the other then why comment at all.



[edit on 6-1-2009 by Bob Down Under]

Regarding Kopff crater, in my opinion the bright spot can be a crater which formed sometime between 1967 and 1994:
its (apparent) absence in the older photo would support this theory, while its absence in the most recent one would have ruled out that it's some actual formation: craters don't vanish in less than 30 years, unless some catastrophical event occurs or something else i'm missing right now.


Unless the area in question, in the LO image was too darkened by the shadow: but i can't spot any indication of the presence of the crater in the LO image, including its radial ejecta, which should be, at least barely, visible: a recently formed crater would be a good explanation, in my opinion, but that's just an opinion.


At some distance, it looks like some glass dome, at a closer distance it looks like a big crater with a smaller crater inside
Just my 2 €. cents.


[edit on 6/1/2009 by internos]

you've got me.

Easynow posted this:

Originally posted by easynow

this picture from Zond 3 has always intrigued me. i don't know what it is but it could be some type of Alien structure ?

www.greatdreams.com...

Then i asked what was the anomaly there, in that picture.

Then somehow it results that i'm blind, because not seeing the obiously anomaly there, and sent me to "make my homework"

Going to the greatdreams link, I saw exactly the same crop, from Apollo 10, allegedly showing "an incredible array of artificial lunar constructions". WOW.

Then, again, not seeing which was that anomaly, I've asked again, and then I tried my own explanation ON THAT PICTURE, thanks to Bigfatfurrytexan who explained me, about that "white patch rising above the surface"

In my view, based on posible scenario assumed from that croped photo posted here by Easynow, so, in my view, posted before ( www.abovetopsecret.com... ), it can be just ordinary relief bumping at sunlight/dark boundary..So the zone next to the boundary not beeing the dark sky as assumed, but the dark side of the moon.


Now, thanks to Phage, i saw the big picture, Now the anomaly APPEAR to be on the edge of the moon. The scenario proposed by me before, seeme now more unlikely. I will come back on this.

Anyway, I think, my questions regarding "where is the anomaly" were entirely honest. I now understand that seeing me the "damn blind obtuse skeptik debunker", transforms you in a not very colaborative or transparent speakers. Thanks to Phage for time consumed clarifiing the picture.

now, the next opinion of mine, is that the anomaly could be more an image artifact. The "alien structure", so big (miles away) is yet a very low probability.

I will come back on this.



[edit on 6/1/09 by depthoffield]

Originally posted by internos
Unless the area in question, in the LO image was too darkened by the shadow: but i can't spot any indication of the presence of the crater in the LO image, including its radial ejecta, which should be, at least barely, visible: a recently formed crater would be a good explanation, in my opinion, but that's just an opinion.

To be honest, I think the crater inside Kopff is still there! Its just so overblown in the false color image. I mean, if you look at the high res shot there is something just bordering the shadow that's has a lighter color than the rest of the area. Here is another image I found:
lpod.org...
Again, the whiter area (more visible on this one though the images seem oddly similar) of the possible ejecta is shown.

Its too bad we dont have a high res shot of the sun coming in from the other direction, then that issue could easily be laid to rest, lol.

[edit on 6-1-2009 by merka]