Alien Domes On The Moon? Let’s Set The Controversy to Rest!

This Apollo 14 image was taken when Alan Shepard walked around, behind the LEM, and took an image looking north, with his Hasselblad. Seems all’s normal until you turn up the brightness and contrast!


AS14-66-9279HR
Courtesy: NASA

With enhanced B/C. I have marked the anomalous objects/structure with red arrows….



Now the original NASA image was initially found by Richard Hoagland and since I’m not much of a fan of his, I wanted to lay this controversy to rest one way or the other. So are these anomalous objects the result of a photographic glitch? Lens flare? Reflections? Some pixel-play? Or is it the real deal? The original image from the NASA web site is linked below.

So what do you guys think? Aliens-on-the-Moon or bust?

Cheers!


www.hq.nasa.gov...

I am no photography expert but that looks like nothing significant to me. Reflection on the lens or something, who knows? I think that John Lear and Zorgon had some much more intriguing images of "domes" on the moon.

I think you have exposed some of the background of the soundstage this shot was taken on. I think it is far more simple than people would like it to be. Haoxing the moon landing is a 'crazy' idea, and yet alien domes on the moon and floating random shapes makes plenty of sense to me.

The moon is billions of years older than the earth. It was 'moved' here about 10,000 years ago iirc. Many ancient civilisations speak of a 'time before the moon'. The moon is mostly hollow, and there are several massive sub-terranean (underground) disc shaped, possibly metallic structures on the near side of the moon (the side facing earth) and a few more on the far side. There are probably several civilisations with outposts on the surface and inside the moon.

[edit on 28-12-2008 by freakyty]

reply to post by freakyty


Is there any way that you or the person that starred that post can get me to believe any of that?

Originally posted by Iblis Smiley
reply to post by freakyty

 

Is there any way that you or the person that starred that post can get me to believe any of that?

Id get used to it,this is what happens when people only get information from one source that agrees with their view point and dont look at opposing views...or it simply goes in one ear and out the other.Anyway im not a photography expert...i remember hulk hoagland talking about a refraction of light in one of the pictures of the moon that somehow signified glass like domes...I dont buy it one bit for various reasons but nice to ponder about.

Cheers

Hi Mike.
I always enjoy your posts, although I gotta say (although I believe the moon may hold many secrets) that this doesn't really look like much so far.
I was thinking if India found anything we may get to see it, although I haven't heard of any major images stirring up a fuss.

reply to post by freakyty

If you believe that, I have some prime beach front property I'd love to sell you. Meet me there when the tide is out!

IRM

[edit on 28/12/08 by InfaRedMan]

It appears to be light reflecting off the surface of the landing gear next to the camera.

The light reflecting off it at an angle makes near perfect sense and does seem to line up at an angel.

The domes the reflection off the top piece you can see in the photo in fact the "dome" is touching that area and gives off an obvious bright reflection just due to it's size.

The others also line up and appear to be the right size for a reflection.

[edit on 28-12-2008 by Darthorious]

Originally posted by serpentine
Hi Mike.
I was thinking if India found anything we may get to see it, although I haven't heard of any major images stirring up a fuss.

Nope!! Out of all the images from ISRO, I couldn't find any of Hoagy's domes or Mike Bara's Moon bases thus far!

But remember, these darn space agencies are all in it together! It's like you-scratch-my-back-and-I'll-scratch-yours! So if you're looking for some disclosure, it ain't gonna come!

Cheers!

The same trapezoid-shaped feature can be also seen in:
AS14-66-9301

AS14-66-9245

AS14-66-9250

AS14-66-9285



Especially in AS14-66-9245 and 9285, it clearly turns out to be lens flare, see for example AS14-66-9249, in which the feature becomes more obvious. Needless to say, the fact that the camera was pointing towards different directions, should automatically rule out that we are talking about a structure, or at least, about the same structure. Just my 2 €. cents

reply to post by Darthorious


That is the same "conclusion" that I came to, This is why I don't have that many "points", there seems to always be someone that posts so close to what I am thinking I usually don't bother to post... LOl

But thank you Mike I always do find your posts fascinating.. maybe someday you will find something so blatantly obvious that we will all just sit here and go DAMN!!!!!!

Most likely if you do, we will all just sit here and go DAMN,, Whatever happened to Mike?????? he just dissappeared........

edit to add, ssss the sss button on keyboard is arguing with me.....

[edit on 28-12-2008 by SideWynder]

It is certainly an interesting photo but I would be more inclined to go with the idea that it is a sound stage(as noted by Iblis Smiley above) rather than a glass dome.

Anyway, I wouldn't believe a damn thing Hoagland says without checking it out for yourself first. I have been fooled by that guy far too many times before.

I guess we'll just have to wait until the NASA go back to the moon with better photographic equipment before we can come to a conclusion about the glass dome theory.

reply to post by Darthorious


I concur with you completely on the reflection /diffusion off the lander explanation Darthorious! It brings into question the intelligence of Hoagland or his moral compass. Either way, it turns out bad for him.

Perhaps it's a "Hyper Dimensional" Dome?

All jokes aside, this is a guy who has spent the later part of his life making money off promoting 'unfalsifiables'... ahem... and Pareidolia!

For all those that felt disenfranchised to grow up & learn that Santa, the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy weren't real, we give you Richard C and his Bag 'O' Mysteries and Magic.

IRM

[edit on 28/12/08 by InfaRedMan]

Originally posted by Solomons
Id get used to it,this is what happens when people only get information from one source that agrees with their view point and dont look at opposing views...or it simply goes in one ear and out the other.Anyway im not a photography expert...i remember hulk hoagland talking about a refraction of light in one of the pictures of the moon that somehow signified glass like domes...I dont buy it one bit for various reasons but nice to ponder about.

Cheers

I guess I was just surprised to see someone state something as fact that is even more crazy than myself believing the hole thing was hoaxed. I mean, metal disks inside and on the side of the hollow moon is pretty specific. I would like to think that anyone hearing or reading something so out there, would check a few sources just to make sure.

Well there IS something definately up there. Could be a smudge or a studio back drop, some sort of lighting par reflection, or.....a UFO or a dome.
My guess would be a rarefaction of the lens?

Originally posted by freakyty
The moon is billions of years older than the earth. It was 'moved' here about 10,000 years ago iirc. Many ancient civilisations speak of a 'time before the moon'. The moon is mostly hollow, and there are several massive sub-terranean (underground) disc shaped, possibly metallic structures on the near side of the moon (the side facing earth) and a few more on the far side. There are probably several civilisations with outposts on the surface and inside the moon.

[edit on 28-12-2008 by freakyty]

I for one starred your post reason being is that, I too feel that there is something on the moon and your words ring true to me. If other people did the research instead of trolling threads, they will find that quite simply the moon hasn't always been where it is.

It is my opinion that there is a mining operation going on the moon or that is indeed a craft of some sort. Will we ever find out either way I don't know. One thing for sure not everything is what it seems to be.

reply to post by internos


Nice work internos!!! If only Hoagy was as intelligent as you my friend!

Big Star 4 U!

IRM

Yes I do believe what I wrote, otherwise why would I write it?

Anyway back on topic, I don't personally believe there are "domes" on the surface of the moon. The photo in the OP is not actually a photo of the lunar surface, it is a staged photo. Wether or not the Apollo missions landed on the moon is debateable, but the photos were clearly faked.

Originally posted by franspeakfree

Originally posted by freakyty
The moon is billions of years older than the earth. It was 'moved' here about 10,000 years ago iirc. Many ancient civilisations speak of a 'time before the moon'. The moon is mostly hollow, and there are several massive sub-terranean (underground) disc shaped, possibly metallic structures on the near side of the moon (the side facing earth) and a few more on the far side. There are probably several civilisations with outposts on the surface and inside the moon.

[edit on 28-12-2008 by freakyty]

I for one starred your post reason being is that, I too feel that there is something on the moon and your words ring true to me. If other people did the research instead of trolling threads, they will find that quite simply the moon hasn't always been where it is.

It is my opinion that there is a mining operation going on the moon or that is indeed a craft of some sort. Will we ever find out either way I don't know. One thing for sure not everything is what it seems to be.

Can you show this research please?

Wouldn't want to go and contradict yourself now.