Alien Domes On The Moon? Let’s Set The Controversy to Rest!

Originally posted by Kandinsky
I posted this link way back in the thread, when the point was first raised about the Moon's creation. Have a look please, I think it was overlooked and it's certainly relevant.

It's called 24 Hours of Chaos. It describes and illustrates how the Moon came into being due to the collision of another body. The language and terminology is aimed at the average intelligent person with basic science knowledge.

The images are clear and illustrate that there wasn't any 'gouging' or 'big holes' left in the Earth. It's all accounted for in the theory. Unfortunately, several years ago, the site had an animation which is no longer there. As previously mentioned, the theory has been accepted as the predominant theory but is still open to tweaks and changes

That is interesting, but i have serious concerns about it.

The two primary concerns are:

1. There is a mythological basis for the moon not being in orbit around the earth until around 10k years ago.

2. The article has this paragraph:

The Moon is not the only result of this chaos. In fact, the present spacing between planets "evolved by a sort of natural selection involving the demise of intervening objects whose orbits were not so stable," Melosh said.

And it ignored the mathematics behind the placement of the planets. The "spacing" of the planets was predicted mathematically long before we launched a probe.

A smaller concern is that the article focuses on Iron, but leaves out other minerals. It is nice that the moon has no iron to speak of, and it supports their theory. What about the titanium? Why is the moon so rich in titanium? Further, since the Earth's crust is rich in aluminum, is the moon also rich in aluminum?

reply to post by mikesingh


Mike, i found this video of the Moon and it does appear to show a dome of somekind. and yes it's not a NASA released sheeple video



interesting eh ?

also i found a post from Ziggystar60 in the lunar tank thread that has a transcript from Apollo 12 and it sure does seem as if one of the Astronauts was trying to get his co worker to see a dome he spotted.

Hey, look at that - look at this crazy thing! Look at that dome. Right here. That big... there.

www.abovetopsecret.com...




here is some more fun reading


www.maatunidy.com...
www.bibliotecapleyades.net...
www.lunaranomalies.com...
www.lunaranomalies.com...
www.angelfire.com...

reply to post by easynow


You know, it would seem that there are many, many domes on the moon that are well known and discussed by "official" sources.

Take Kiel:





or this paper, The Moon Domes in the Hortensius Region

But they are all pegged as "volcanic domes". What confuses me is that the moon is said to have been "dead" for eons. Go figure.

Originally posted by mikesingh
As well as the puzzle of how the Moon got here in the first place.

Errrr...Oh yes! Something big as Mars hit the Earth and gouged out the Moon from mother Earth without as much as producing a hole or depression at least a thousand miles in depth and few thousand miles in diameter!! Oh yeah, that's been covered up over millions of years by magma, the flattening process of the surface as a result of the Earth's centrifugal forces, atmospheric weathering and so on! All pretty believable stuff, what?[edit on 4-1-2009 by mikesingh]

Oh don't be silly. The Earth is clearly hollow as there is no evidence to the contrary. It immediately bounced back as would a hollow rubber ball. See, solution found and explained.

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
In regard to a mythological basis for the moon being a much more recent attachment to Earth, I think Hanslune would offer a strong argument that it pre-dates 10, 000 years. He's far more informed than I am on the subject. Nevertheless, from what I can gather...

There are a number of artifacts that show man has been counting the phases of the moon before that time. One of which is the Ishango Bone, another is the Blanchard Bone Plaque. Observing the phases of the Moon would obviously be of great use to agriculture, but a lot of evidence of early Man's observance was based on menstruation. These artifacts indicate the presence of the Moon before 10, 000 years ago.

The famous Lascaux caves of France have ancient pictures that are believed to show the passage of the moon. A more colorful source is found here.

reply to post by Kandinsky


There is no need to get to far down this path...

....however, menstration is not cyclical according tot he moon. Often, possibly, but not exclusively.

as well, many ancient cultures don't have words to describe the passage of time as effectively as we do. 10k years is from my memory, and may represent much longer.

perhaps there is another thread on ATS we could discuss this on.

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan


yea that's interesting that many official sources are contemplating domes on the Moon and for me that means they probably do exist. i have never been to the Moon...lol so i can't say for sure.... but if there was volcanic activity at one time then it would be easy to speculate that some of these domes were created from that process.

is this process still continuing ? i don't know but if i had to guess i would say that the Moon ran out of gas long ago and has cooled down and will probably not be an active celestial body any longer. i could be wrong of course but that theory works for me since i not aware of any evidence of recent activity.

i also think that the process that created these natural domes cannot be compared to the volcanic processes that are here on Earth because the conditions were probably not the same. so enough of me babbling on here.


thanks for the link to those documents , it's a very interesting read

Originally posted by easynow
yea that's interesting that many official sources are contemplating domes on the Moon and for me that means they probably do exist. i have never been to the Moon...lol so i can't say for sure.... but if there was volcanic activity at one time then it would be easy to speculate that some of these domes were created from that process.

Wait, which domes according to "official sources" are you talking about? Of course domes exist on the moon: They are a natural part of crater formation and the moon has quite a bit of craters.

Ironically, one of the largest impact sites on Earth is among other names, called the Vredefort Dome... And I believe it was mistaken for volcanic activity early on

[edit on 4-1-2009 by merka]

reply to post by merka


jeeze no matter what you say these days someone has to try and twist it.

i was replying to bigfatfurrytexan and if you read the the documents that are in his link you will see i was talking about natural domes.

Originally posted by merka
Wait, which domes according to "official sources" are you talking about? Of course domes exist on the moon: They are a natural part of crater formation and the moon has quite a bit of craters.

If your "official sources" are NASA, then please rethink. NASA are lying out of their own craters. Domes are there. WE can see them. YOU can't see them. Not our problem people like YOU are blind.

This thread is great (suffice the lame skeptic debunker ego thriving spazos).
Sometimes I wish these self elaborated wankers would just start their own threads where they can lavish themselves with their own self righteous fluids, bath in all their glories of conquests, and then be sucked into the lower vibrational galaxies where they belong. I cherish the thought.

I see domes, artifacts and construction all over this artificial craft that some beyond our knowledge made with their technologies. Drove it here and parked it in our orbit. How did they make it? One theory is they found a chuck of rock, and heated it, then blew it (like a glass blower makes things but obviously on a massive scale) into its shape. So it would be hollow or at least partly hollow. Why would they then mine it I wonder? Well apparently the soil is rich for oxygen creation. Perhaps the moon is made of some other compound that is prized amongst the stars. That I am still looking into.

OH also has anyone got the ULOs book by Allan Sturm from lunomaly.com... ? Is it worth the price? And this is the type of book you major moonie doctors should combine to create so I can buy a copy and be at peace.

wZn

Originally posted by watchZEITGEISTnowIs it worth the price? And this is the type of book you major moonie doctors should combine to create so I can buy a copy and be at peace.

He has a pdf version available for a mere $5.00. Seems reasonable to me considering "Dark Mission" fetches $50-$60 bucks

What us make a book? If we did that the skeptics would shout "Yer only in it for the money, so your work doesn't count"

Silly Lemmings

And Anti American too... since the freedom to publish is one of the few 'perks' for living in a democratic dictatorship

Originally posted by merka
Wait, which domes according to "official sources" are you talking about? Of course domes exist on the moon:

Well if the premise of anomaly researchers is that NASA 'obfuscates' the truth why on EARTH would we consider NASA a reliable source of info?

reply to post by easynow


Here is another page talking about "lunar reclamation":

www.lunar-reclamation.org...

On the right, a glass dome, with a rotating half shield facing the Sun

On the left, a top-shielded observation tower, reminiscent of an airport control tower. Exposure to radiation coming from all directions of the sky is minimized by the shileded top cap. The base of the tower could have a pedestrian EVA airlock.

In both cases, pressurization stresses need to be addressed. The idea here is to suggest direct visual access at the surface for "part time" recreational use to minimize radiation exposure.

They go on to discuss how to grow your own food using sunlight:





and using lunar regolith to sheild harmful radiation:




anyone interested in lunar living should certainly check this site out.

Wow, pages of documents writting be people imagining how we will live on the moon. That must mean it is happening right? In the 50's they planned flying cars, aerial highways...see them yet? Come on, they wrote about it in the '50s so if they write about it, they must have it already right? Is that the logic at work here? NASA has you all chasing your own tales. They never even went to the moon and now there are all these people discussing how we are mining it? I think you all need to do some work proving that we could actually even get to the moon, let alone colonize and mine it.

reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan


great info thanks for the link

certainly lots of possibilities when it comes to Moon Bases. underground sounds like the most plausible for protection and for lack of detection.

this picture of a possible Moon Base has always interested me because if it was painted the same color as the surface, you would never see it.



this picture from Zond 3 has always intrigued me. i don't know what it is but it could be some type of Alien structure ?



www.greatdreams.com...



[edit on 4-1-2009 by easynow]

Originally posted by Kandinsky
Without field experts and challengers, it would just be a barrage of photos without question. It would be like hanging out on a bad 'paranormal' thread all day whilst everyone nods their heads in agreement. Place wouldn't be the same without them. They add spice and substance.

Edited to show that it's not about choosing sides, but choosing the best evidence

Good points you brought out in your post, Kandinsky! Especially the part quoted above. I am in total agreement that there HAS to be the other side (Not the dark side!! ) to any argument, without which it wouldn't amount to a discussion at all. The need is to debate an issue till some possible conclusion is reached either way.

But there are ways of doing it and one I see as the best is the 'gentlemanly way'. What gets my goat is people who profess they are the ultimate in knowledge whilst putting down others as ranting fools trying to bludgeon their way through with a hidden agenda. Now that's crass to say the least. Let there be healthy arguments - in fact a thread is incomplete without them. But in a civil way without trying to score brownie points.

Cheers!

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by easynow

 

Here is another page talking about "lunar reclamation":

www.lunar-reclamation.org...

On the left, a top-shielded observation tower. Exposure to radiation coming from all directions of the sky is minimized by the shielded top cap. The base of the tower could have a pedestrian EVA airlock.

Hmm...BFT, that pic you posted above with a shielded observation tower resembles this image I posted on another thread of a similar looking 'tower' on the Moon imaged by the Lunar Orbiter. Here...



Looks like this 'tower' has some sort of a cap too, though much smaller in size! Intriguing, what?

Cheers!

reply to post by easynow


Good find! I wonder where on earth...err I mean Moon it is, though it resembles the area that zorgon posted earlier.


The Living Moon

Cheers!

Originally posted by merka

Originally posted by mikesingh

Originally posted by merka
See the glass biosphere? I dont

C'mon man! Didn't you know it's been air-brushed by NASA (Our favorite whipping boy)??

I mean, well...what do we know?

But try debunking this one...

Cheers!

(Link in my signature)

[edit on 2-1-2009 by mikesingh]

Do I even need to debunk it? Its the crater Aristarchos, with Herodotus seen below and the Vallis Shröteri formation as worm like formation next to it.

Easy find thanks to Internos picture with the named craters

Aristarchos crater on wikipedia



[edit on 2-1-2009 by merka]

hi..there are some serious problems with the images in your links...the first..the wiki one..looks really manipulated..the crater looks sort of smeared....and the second one is obviously manipulated..look at the shadow and how it isnt as hard as all the other shadows being cast in the other craters..looks painted to me...

Originally posted by mikesingh
reply to post by easynow

 

Good find!

I wonder where on earth...err I mean Moon it is, though it resembles the area that zorgon posted earlier.


The Living Moon

Cheers!

Now why continue to repeating the same again and again and again?
I don't want to imagine that some guys here, basically in fact just continue to hunt clicks for thelivingmoon.

Here is another image of the same crater, posted a couple of pages ago by Merka:



www.abovetopsecret.com...




Now were is the dome? (I will guess your answer: it was airbrushed by NASA, because NASA lyies and cannot trust anything. So, we have no chance to get over this picture, very likely some kind of artifact, and no matter what other pictures of the crater will be made, the controversy will remain, because for some people this kind of image is the heart reason of believing... in their stories.


[edit on 5/1/09 by depthoffield]