It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dooleysleftleg
Got nothing technical to add but im really worried for you guys in the immediate vacinity if FEMA are involved,this points to something big normally and its to much of a coincidence the programmes going down at the same time and new readings not being available to the average Joe! Id be thinking of taking a small vacation just to be on the safe side for the next few days and 'getting the hell outta dodge' and as far away as is possible.Not trying to scaremonger but its always better to err on the side of caution in these matters. Hope its nothing though,good luck!
Originally posted by TwiTcHomatic
reply to post by TARBOX
All sensors are down, except one just found above.
You really should at least read the last 3-5 pages when coming back to a thread of this size.
Originally posted by JustMike
reply to post by SixNine
The experts would tend to agree with you that a magma eruption is less likely, but what they are probably concerned about right now is the possibility of a hydrothermal explosion. As I mentioned a few posts back with a quote from a research report on Yellowstone, that region of the lake is considered the most likely for such an event, and one of the signs would be a swarm of quakes gradually reducing in depth and possibly heading along a line to the north, which is exactly what this swarm is doing.
As you probably know, a hydrothermal explosion would very likely be far more devastating in its immediate effects on the surrounding environment, while a magma flow (the same experts say) would probably move much more slowly.
That being said, we have no way of knowing if either of those events is actually imminent. Some agencies are being "kept informed" but unfortunately the public is not on the list of those who need to know if there's anything to really worry about or not.
Mike
Edit to add: If there is hydrothermal activity going on under the surface I hope it's nothing beyond the norms for that area. Otherwise it's a worry. As for the magma chamber, could you give a source for the data about its depth?
Further edit to add: I see that this is your first day here. Welcome! Could you also explain why you feel that quakes at a greater depth are more of a worry than quakes which are progressively occurring at shallower and shallower depths? Again, what you state is at odds which what the experts report in respect of "premonitory" behaviour of quake swarms that might indicate an eruption. They say quite the opposite (and I've mentioned it above), so what is your source for your statement? Thanks.
[edit on 1/1/09 by JustMike]
[edit on 1/1/09 by JustMike]
Originally posted by 1SawSomeThings
This site: "Earthquake Studies Office at the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology" is still posting data for LKWY (near the north lake shore). The time frame is different that the U of Utah site, and the graph peaks are not truncated as much making it appear messy. Also giving a better idea as to the magnitude of some of the events. It appears that LKWY has had a bumpy start to the new year. Scroll down to LKWY SPZ US at the link mbmgquake.mtech.edu...
Originally posted by trusername
I got in here yesterday I think - but today look:
www.seis.utah.edu...
Originally posted by JustMike
reply to post by SixNine
Okay. Yes, it's about five miles (8 km). Just wanted to know if you had an actual source you could quote as we like sources we can click on and check if possible. A good source for info about the Yellowstone magma chamber (that you can file for future reference when characters like me ask such questions ) is the questions about Yellowstone research page at USGS.
In short, if we make statements about such important matters then we often get asked to back them up. That's common here at ATS.
You didn't respond to my other queries but I can assure you, that with the current situation at Yellowstone, the scientists would be far more concerned by the trend of the quakes in that swarm to occur at shallower and shallower depths as this is one of the premonitory indicators of a possible hydrothermal explosion in that vicinity by the lake, because a hydrothermal explosion is historically far, far more likely than a major magmatic eruption. I referenced the report for you that states in most unequivocal terms what those indicators for an H.E. are thought to be, and quakes occurring at greater depths (while also of concern naturally enough) are not one of those indicators.