It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Whats going on at yellowstone?

page: 72
510
<< 69  70  71    73  74  75 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by ANNED
To spread to really be called a swarm most swarms are almost on top of each other.

On this site you can see two different swarms one about 20 miles north of china lake and one north east about 30 miles.
pasadena.wr.usgs.gov...

The north swarm has been going on for years due to geothermo drilling

The north east swarm is something new and has been going oh for a month with no old history

I live at china lake and was born and raised here so i know the history of earth quakes in the area.


That's the swarm I was talking about, I've never seen anything in that area as long as I can remember, especially that far NE from the usual concentrations of micros.




reply to post by WSPfan
 


Actually, if you look at the first example of the harmonic tremor posted by indy, that looks exactly like the graphs on the 27th, only not as amplified, and not as long. It's merely a continuous shaking. The graphs on previous pages with St. Helens and the ones from the 27th side by side look eerily similar.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:23 PM
link   
reply to post by lernmore
 



I looked into HF quakes more and just don't see it. These are almost exactly like the harmonics from St. Helens. There is definitely "noise" in the system that is picked up throughout the park. This has to be volcanic/magma related. there are no faults I know of that would shake continuously for hours. This may all end up not blowing or releasing, but something has happened down there. They will be studying this for years I am sure.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:24 PM
link   
Indy- Have you taken a look at the Mt. Rainer graphs though? They are exactly the same thing. Even if you zoomed in. They look pretty convincing, there have even been articles on them being harmonic on the net.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:26 PM
link   
okay I placed the charts of LKWY / YPP and YML next to eachother..conclusion I draw = something is building up today...the lines becomes fatter each hour....



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:27 PM
link   
As for the EQ's here in California, we have probably hundreds if not thousands a year here, most are not felt, and unless you live close to an Epicenter, I don't think you could feel anything under 4.0.

We had a 4.5 and 5.0 within the last 2 years that I definitely felt but beyond that nothing. No damage, just swaying and rolling. California is a major seismically active area and its going on all the time, specially 'round the San Andreas. Lots of movement, lots of small stuff. I wouldnt associate it that much with what is happening in Yellowstone at the moment.

Although we are overdue for the Big One so I've heard.That RSOE Map is just a little misleading in that its showing the small EQ's here in Ca. that really arent felt and happen daily.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Realtruth
Originally it was for the New Madrid Fault line, but apparently the proof, facts and activity are pointing to something much bigger, Yellowstone.

I think watching animal activity and behavior will be the biggest indicator to people in those areas.


I agree. Watch the animals. They will feel what is coming.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:33 PM
link   
reply to post by Springheel Jack
 


RSOE map only shows larger and most recent (I think last 24 hours)

It will just put on top of each other if they're nearby - what I thought was interesting was the path curving to the east from Calif - but yes it may be nothing, I'm here in Calif and can attest that there are constant constant quakes.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by WSPfan
reply to post by lernmore
 



I looked into HF quakes more and just don't see it. These are almost exactly like the harmonics from St. Helens. There is definitely "noise" in the system that is picked up throughout the park. This has to be volcanic/magma related. there are no faults I know of that would shake continuously for hours. This may all end up not blowing or releasing, but something has happened down there. They will be studying this for years I am sure.


I think you misunderstood me, I was agreeing with you and disagreeing with indy.
That subtle, constant movement is clearly what I would interpret to be moving magma, not fault related.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:40 PM
link   
reply to post by lernmore
 


I know, i was just reiterating my points.

I went back and looked at YML since this started. I can find 5 DEFINITE periods of harmonics/flow/whatever we are calling them. Two very significant, with the one super pollock period.

12/27 1000-1800MST - 8 hour event
12/28-29 1000-0500MST - 19 hour event
12/29-30 1100 0400MST - 17 hour event
12/30 1330-1600MST - 2.5 hour event
12/31 0800-presentMST



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by asmall89
Uh so is this not normal then? I go to college right next to the thing! Now I really don't want to go back there after break. From somewhere I heard the date was 2010 or 2012, too bad I can't recall the source... Thats scary.

Where are you going to college? You must not mean RIGHT next to. I live 90 miles away and feel I'm right next to it. I'm concerned right now, but I don't think anything is going to happen. Quakes are a daily thing up there. I don't see anything else associated with a huge explosion...yet. Yes, 250 in the past 3 or 4 days is a bit much but so far I don't hear anyone screaming RUN!!!!! We are southwest of it so we might have a chance to survive if its blowing to the east... just not sure how bad the ash would be here in Rexburg. From what I hear it would take the pyroblast 1 hour to reach us. I read everything 60 miles around it would be destroyed by that blast...with us at 90 miles I hope that is enough cushion.
Should it blow my ATS brothers will be the first to know. If you see a post saying AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH...crap. You'll know it was me. LOL



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by spinkyboo

Originally posted by Realtruth
Originally it was for the New Madrid Fault line, but apparently the proof, facts and activity are pointing to something much bigger, Yellowstone.

I think watching animal activity and behavior will be the biggest indicator to people in those areas.


I agree. Watch the animals. They will feel what is coming.

My dog is licking his butt right now. Do you think its safe?



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:44 PM
link   



I agree. Watch the animals. They will feel what is coming.


Well, the animals in this webcam have stayed put for days...


www.nps.gov...

Seriously, I have been checking the webcams that I could find, hoping to see wildlife, but so far.. none. Doesn't mean I'm saying the critters are not there, just that they are not in front of the camera to see.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:44 PM
link   
I've made a time-lapse GIF animation sequence to better understand how the quakes moved toward north over time AND how deep they were:

Thumbnail:


In case clicking the thumbnail does not bring to the enlarged GIF file, click this link.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by Alienmojo

Originally posted by spinkyboo

Originally posted by Realtruth
Originally it was for the New Madrid Fault line, but apparently the proof, facts and activity are pointing to something much bigger, Yellowstone.

I think watching animal activity and behavior will be the biggest indicator to people in those areas.


I agree. Watch the animals. They will feel what is coming.

My dog is licking his butt right now. Do you think its safe?


Yes - that is definitely a good sign!



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:48 PM
link   
Hey guys, just found this little bit of info. Febuary of this year there was a 6.0 mag EQ near Lake Yellowstone with a depth of 6.5km, which is deep enough to affect the magma chamber. Maybe that could be the precursor to whats happening now. Just a thought.

This link is from Utah University, it shows the Lat/Lon. at top and you kinda have to use that to pinpoint the EQ, it didnt show up as a marked point on the map.

6.0 Mag Earthquake, Feb. 2008 near Yellowstone Lake



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:51 PM
link   
Has anyone heard an "expert" give the chances of this thing actually exploding? Or are they even acknowledging that this is going on?



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:53 PM
link   
Listen, the YML graph is begining to wash over the lines above and below current. This is what it looked like on the 29th at the begining and end of that event. This is starting to look like it may be as significant as the 29th event. Something is going on. Where the hell are the experts on this. There needs to be some updating going on. I don't give a damn if the MSM doesn't want to report it, it needs to be out there. Who the hell do we call to find out what is going on? Seriously???



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by flora



I agree. Watch the animals. They will feel what is coming.


Well, the animals in this webcam have stayed put for days...


www.nps.gov...

Seriously, I have been checking the webcams that I could find, hoping to see wildlife, but so far.. none. Doesn't mean I'm saying the critters are not there, just that they are not in front of the camera to see.


Maybe they are camera shy. : )

Would probably be hard to detect any specific behavior from that perspective.
Now, if you suddenly saw them stampeding in front of the camera -
- well - then there's a problem.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by Indy
Harmonic looks nothing like the quakes on those Yellowstone seismographs. They are more of a rolling line and not a shaking line. But the rolling effect could be lost in the quality of the digital seismograph output when shrunk down to a size small enough to fit on one screen. None of us here know unless we have access to a much more detailed image.


I've seen waveforms similar to those linked before on Rainiers seismographs, nothing happened there 2 years ago when I saw it, and I'd personally say then, that these we see now aren't Harmonic Tremor. The problem is that Harmonic examples seem rare on the web and I can't say I've ever seen a depiction of it taken from the live seismographs on an actual USGS (or other, eg Utah Seismic department) web page.



posted on Dec, 31 2008 @ 04:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Springheel Jack
 


114.86 isn't even on that map,
Good find though 6.0 would certainly be enough to make something give.



new topics

top topics



 
510
<< 69  70  71    73  74  75 >>

log in

join