Whats going on at yellowstone?

reply to post by PuterMan


Yeah, and what's worse is that he has over 4,000 subscribers. I feel the same way you do about that jerk. He's clueless.

Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by ReginaAdonnaAaron

 

Perhaps if you could refrain from posting videos by that person who has absolutely no knowledge and even less intelligence I might be able to keep my blood pressure under control.

How someone has so much time on his hands to make so much complete drivel I really do not know.

edit on 23/3/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)

Thank you!! A friend of mine found a video of his about haarp in canada and emailed it to everybody.I tried my hardest to debunk it,but you know how that goes.

Anmarie,

I looked at the deformation and found that it was not an uplift, but was instead subsidence. I'm not sure if you had it backward or not. Or if you think that the subsidence will cause activity. Let me know what you were thinking exactly.

And for those of you that like to watch the real quakes at Yellowstone, there's been very little to see. But that may be changing. I have noticed very small twinges of movement. Some of it could be ice and an small avalanche or two. This morning there were a couple of small ones which showed up at YMR.

We're overdue for a small swarm. There's only been the odd ping here and there. My webisenses are tingling. It may be nothing. Because it may just be that I see a slight increase in microsiemic noise.

Or it's Arkansas. Because Arkansas is also experiencing an increase in microsiemic noise. There's a correlation. I just don't know the exact cause.

If someone showed you the seismographs for the last few months from Yellowstone and Arkansas without indentifying which was which, and asked you to pick the ones that were from an active volcano, most people would pick Arkansas. No, I don't think Arkansas has a volcano underneath it. It's just that it's all very odd is all.

reply to post by Robin Marks


This would be where I make a joke about Robin getting bit by radio-active seismograms....

Seismo-sense powers activate

(Yes it's early and I thought it was funny. )

M.

I once saw a documentary called earths last days and it showed what would happen exactly if yellow stones super volcano irrupted very scary to imagine that its possibly gonna happen now

reply to post by Robin Marks


Robin,

I was talking/thinking subsidence as the graph shows. With the uplift, we had swarms as the earth expanded and lifted - adjusting itself. In my thinking, you will also see the same where we have subsidence as the earth has to re adjust also.

And - I still want to know what that drop was at the end of Decmeber Here - Plot here now also showing subsidence the past month.

reply to post by Anmarie96


Question,how long is this subsidence going on now? Since 2004?

reply to post by Bl0rg


70 km? I thought the entire state qualified as a caldera.

reply to post by Anmarie96


I honestly have no idea what that strange drop is. Maybe a faulty sensor.

can comet Elenin be related to the 600.000 year cycle of yellowstone ?

----Kazuo Kino#a shows C/2010 X1 to have a heliocentric orbital period of 600,000 years----

en.wikipedia.org...

ps/ elenin was in opposition with sun /earth at the japanese 9.0...........

Originally posted by ressiv
can comet Elenin be related to the 600.000 year cycle of yellowstone ?

----Kazuo Kino#a shows C/2010 X1 to have a heliocentric orbital period of 600,000 years----

en.wikipedia.org...

ps/ elenin was in opposition with sun /earth at the japanese 9.0...........

edit on 28-3-2011 by ressiv because: (no reason given)

Elenin is not going to have any effect on Yellowstone, neither did it have any effect on the Tokohu Earthquake since Elenin is so small (they say ) that there is no way, at the current distance, there could be any effect.

Please look at the excellent size comparison on this thread.

reply to post by PuterMan

size depends on wat kind of matter elenin is .....

reply to post by SLAYER69


In regards to an active caldera, earthquakes are not a way of releasing pressure, but of creating pressure. Calderas are not tetonic plates, but chambers of magma under tremendous pressure. Yellowstone is an active volcano, and although we really can;t assume the same properties as a regular volcano, earthquakes generating in the lake which is directly above the caldera indicate a possible change in the properties of the magma chamber. Volcanoes can remain dormant for thousands of years, we know they are waking up when we start to see earthquake activity. This volcano is just plain scary and hard to evaluate because of it;s size.

reply to post by Robin Marks

um, the north american plate craton is in the process of uplift. The quakes in arkansas are an indication of this, since the seismic zone in arkansas is a rift system and the quakes generated in rift zones are due to uplift. Instead of plate boundaries hitting or sliding under each other, the uplift causes them to pull away from each other due to the rise of the plate underneath it, hence causing a rift. We are seeing uplift in Michigan, the Tetons are sinking and valley in front of them is rising. There are reported incidences of unusual sounds coming all along the North American Plate Craton moving up the eastern coast. I am currently in Texas and at night I can hear the quachita mtns rumbling along the border of the North American plate. Leaving for MInnesota tommorrow so will be back home on the canadian shield.

reply to post by bwcawaterbear


earthquake.usgs.gov...

www.seis.utah.edu...

4.1 quake pretty close to the park.

reply to post by shikori


Quote
4.1 quake pretty close to the park.


I thought this quake was about 400 miles from the park?

Should one consider that close?

Originally posted by bwcawaterbear
reply to post by SLAYER69

 

Calderas are not tetonic plates, but chambers of magma under tremendous pressure.

Hmm, I thought calderas resulted from the collapse of surrounding surface area once a volcano has erupted?

A caldera is a cauldron-like volcanic feature usually formed by the collapse of land following a volcanic eruption, such as the one at Yellowstone National Park in the US. They are sometimes confused with volcanic craters. The word comes from Spanish caldera, and this from Latin CALDARIA, meaning "cooking pot". In some texts the English term cauldron is also used.

In 1815, the German geologist Leopold von Buch visited the Las Cañadas caldera of Teide on Tenerife, and the Caldera de Taburiente on La Palma, both in the Canary Islands. When he published his memoirs he introduced the term caldera into the geological vocabulary.

en.wikipedia.org...

And daisy, pretty sure that quake was not in Yellowstone. Too far south.

soundpolitics.com...

Originally posted by crazydaisy
reply to post by shikori

 

Quote
4.1 quake pretty close to the park.


I thought this quake was about 400 miles from the park?

Should one consider that close?

Crazydaisy... the quake was about 112 miles south of the center of the park.

Now in terms of magma chambers and tubes underground... I have no idea what that means. But as far as I'm concerned, anything that size is too damn close to Yellowstone!