Whats going on at yellowstone?

reply to post by alysha.angel


You just beat me to it!

According to what I have pulled up on GEE right now, it's closest to YPM.

Looks impressive on the seismos.....and so far the depth with USGS is 0.0. Let's hope that get's updated quickly.

EDIT TO ADD: according to USGS it's been reviewed twice already and they still have it as 3.2 and 0.0

[edit on 3-4-2010 by westcoast]

Originally posted by westcoast
reply to post by alysha.angel

 

You just beat me to it!

According to what I have pulled up on GEE right now, it's closest to YPM.

Looks impressive on the seismos.....and so far the depth with USGS is 0.0. Let's hope that get's updated quickly.

whatever sue me!

well that 2.4 dept remained the same so who knows,

bad news i just checked the usgs site again and guess what its been reviewed and all is the same .. 3.2 o.o dept . whatever that means

[edit on 3/4/10 by alysha.angel]

reply to post by alysha.angel


So do you have GEE?

If so, look at the wave length for PB.B208....lookin a little wierd.

Originally posted by westcoast
reply to post by alysha.angel

 

So do you have GEE?

If so, look at the wave length for PB.B208....lookin a little wierd.

i do have it but pc sucks ass so im stuck with firefoxs quake watch add on.

if you ask me its not looking good if we get more of these then i dunno. wait n see .

Here come the "eruption is eminent" posts.

reply to post by alysha.angel


Check out YMR, looks like it was knocked around. IF it were really that close to the surface, it would make sense that it was thrown off....

I'll be watching GEE now for the rest of the evening anyways...something is stirring!

reply to post by westcoast


Or, YMR has been having problems lately.

Originally posted by jvz123
Here come the "eruption is eminent" posts.

Ummm.....no, not by us regular posters, at least. Yellowstone is a VAST cauldron of activity and any kind of change can be a symptom of any NUMBER of possibilities, erruption being the least likely.

So while I get excited about it, it's because of the opportunity to witness these changes as they happen and learn something from it, not because I think 'the big one' is coming.

Originally posted by westcoast
reply to post by alysha.angel

 

Check out YMR, looks like it was knocked around. IF it were really that close to the surface, it would make sense that it was thrown off....

I'll be watching GEE now for the rest of the evening anyways...something is stirring!

iv seen it . and your right
ill be doing the same . lord knows iv got nothing better to do .

Originally posted by jvz123
reply to post by westcoast

 

Or, YMR has been having problems lately.

While several stations have been having issues, YMR is one of the few that has been reliable.

reply to post by westcoast


Missing chunks of data isn't very reliable if you ask me.

[edit on 3-4-2010 by jvz123]

reply to post by jvz123


OK, I see what you're referring to now. Looks like two gaps yesterday. I stand corrected.

I still think though that it looks like a reaction to the quake.

Okay, so YFT seismo did the same thing.

I'm not drawing any conclusions, but I think it's worth noting.

reply to post by westcoast


Fair enough, it does look like it shook those two a bit.

And here comes another one.....this one isnt as big, but still probably at least a 2.5.

west yellowstone got hit by an eq mag 3 at 0km depth. Now thats a bit shallow isnt it? so anything happened in the park due to the effects of this quake?

Originally posted by loner007
west yellowstone got hit by an eq mag 3 at 0km depth. Now thats a bit shallow isnt it? so anything happened in the park due to the effects of this quake?

We're still waiting to see if that depth gets revised. It's been reviewed already and so far is staying at 0.0. If that is, in fact accurate, than it may be significant. The seismos are continuing to be very active and looking at that quake on them. they might indicate it was, in fact very near the surface.

What's it mean? I really am not sure, but it's a bit unusual....at least for that large of one. I'm waiting for Puterman or someone else who is good at analyzing these to chime in.

reply to post by westcoast


Doubt that's a 2.5, would've been automatically recorded.