Whats going on at yellowstone?

reply to post by Anmarie96


Hi Anmarie96,

No sci-fi for me. My 22 videos on how to predict earthquakes 100% accurately anywhere in the world is based on 100% science. The technology that I've used is revolutionary and fairly expensive. The expensive part is why it hasn't been discovered by others, even used equipment will cost over $10,000 per system/unit to get to epicenters. Watch my videos and you will realize that it's all science.

www.youtube.com...

or go to my YouTube channel and watch destroyed cities of the past; also you can see some of the ATS members photos in my subscriptions (please visit their YouTube sites also).

www.youtube.com...

If any of you want to stop the deaths from earthquakes, then please inform the USGS, the UN, your congress person or senators of my knowledge and YouTube site. I guarantee what is on my YouTube site is real and its pure science and all of what is stated is real and that I have secretly studied earthquakes over the decades before they struck. I've studied lots of earthquakes for days and weeks (24 hours a day) before they struck over the decades and I have the proof to verify it.

www.theonion.com...

reply to post by RussianScientists


David (assuming that you are David Berger the copyright owner of the films), you say you are a retired geologist. May I ask you some questions?

First we need to establish that this has relevance to Yellowstone as this is the Yellowstone thread, and there are other threads out there for this if it does not.

Secondly we need to establish your credentials. Where were you a geologists, and in what area of geology? Please note that this is NOT an attack on your abilities, merely establishing that you are who you say you are and have at least some knowledge to enable you to make the claims. [For those readers who are interested you might want to link to this You may need to copy it somewhere and insert paragraphs to make it more readable.]

For my part, so I cannot take a stance without stating where I come from, I studied Geography and Geology at 'A' level back in the days when 'A' levels were worth something *ducks* and plate tectonics were a new fangled idea. I am a (former) member of British Mensa and a programmer so hopefully not completely stupid.

If you can provide that information, then I and possibly others, will get back to you when we have studied the videos (I have downloaded all 22).

I would say however that I consider that any discussion of this should continue in it's own thread and encourage you to make you post the above on a new thread of your making for the purpose of discussion.

If you decide to do that then please do let us know here the link to your thread.

Just one final point. You said above:

all of what is stated is real and that I have secretly studied earthquakes over the decades before they struck. I've studied lots of earthquakes for days and weeks (24 hours a day) before they struck over the decades and I have the proof to verify it.

Surely you cannot have been able to predict serious earthquakes and have done nothing, thereby permitting loss of life and property when it could have been prevented?

[edit on 2/3/2010 by PuterMan]

Post removed, answered my own question. WY.YLA is called WY.YPLB



[edit on 2-3-2010 by EngTech36]

Originally posted by RussianScientists
reply to post by Anmarie96
The technology that I've used is revolutionary and fairly expensive. The expensive part is why it hasn't been discovered by others, even used equipment will cost over $10,000 per system/unit to get to epicenters. Watch my videos and you will realize that it's all science.

The USGS using Geodyssey systems that cost $20,000 to $30,000. Are you saying that your system is better? I may have misunderstood the intent of this post, by are you trying to sell a bill of goods here?

I saw that video... so what is the difference between your system and method of prediction versus the GPS systems that get you millimeter accuracy? I believe the composition of the plates is already known with tomography, so what is being measured with the additional hardware and how does it work for actual predictions? Seem that with so many earthquake swarms occurring, it would seem absurdly impossible to predict future amplitudes of a quake. I am not here to bash the notion of improving technology, but when I hear people claims predictive ability always raises the BS radar.

Tomography and GPS are a couple of the best technologies available to us, The thing that was a little disturbing was hearing that many of these instruments still use dial-up as their method of communication. So they collect real-time data and wait for a group of instruments to download. Would that be slow or what? Every real-time measurement that is recorded is in fact history no matter how fast your connection is, but seem that analysis/computation of the event is time critical. It would also seem that getting the equipment in the right location would be another key issue given the enormous size of geologic plates, prediction of movement along faults, etc. seems highly improbable.

If you'd like to see someone who really is predicting earthquakes, and pretty accurately, look here. His average prediction is about three weeks ahead of time. His name, I believe, is Reginald Roberts. He did not predict the Chilean outbreak, or the Haitian one, but of course, if those had unpredictable triggers, like rainfall and HAARP, how could he have? Nearly every quake he does predict happens. He must be on to something... and he does use the moon in his calculations.

reply to post by Thought Provoker


I have studied this site and in my humble opnion he is NOT predicting earthquakes. Firstly he only favours those areas where he can guarantee a quake, secondly his range of magnitude is so huge that his prediction is pointless and thidly his date parameters leave a lot to be desired.

This belongs in Quakewatch 2010, sorry.

Edit: Look at this guy. Never covered Chile area of the last quake and now all of a sudden predicting:

Chile
Central Region
New Region
(posted 28 February after the M8.8 earthquake)
within 500 km of Santa Cruz, Central Chile, at Lat -34.63 Lon 71.359
M4.4-M6.4
expected about
Mar 12+/-3 days (posted 1110 hours 28th Feb)

Complete and utter rubbish. I could make that prediction. This guy is con artist.


[edit on 2/3/2010 by PuterMan]

reply to post by PuterMan


I'm David, and all of the information that you ask is in the videos. I posted early in this thread and my posts then were 100% correct also, as well as my posts in the threads of Web Bots prediction of a major earthquake striking New Madrid and California. As I stated early on in this thread I studied Old Faithful in 2006 in Yellowstone National Park, and I made some excellent discoveries as stated in my videos.

www.youtube.com...

and your last question is answered in the videos also; Thanks PuterMan.

reply to post by RussianScientists


OK, thanks. I will look. I do not wish to continue this on the Yellowstone thread so will make any reply in QuakeWatch 2010. Please watch for my reply there, I will NOT post about this here again.

reply to post by mapsurfer_


Yes the system I use is much better than what the USGS uses, and no I'm not selling any units. The unit I had made is a conglomeration of other companies equipment, I don't make any of the product that goes into the units; that is in my videos also.

Your BS radar must not be working or it is going off very loudly when you are near it mapsurfer. You state you only watched one video, then you have no clue of what is in the videos. Watch all of them and learn the real truth about earthquakes.

There is no dial up on the equipment.

Wow reading your post is like looking at something from another world, what world are you living in. None of the gobbledygook that you are reffering to is in my 22 videos.

These are my videos.

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by Thought Provoker


Get real Thought Provoker,

Reginald Roberts work is totally worthless, as a matter of fact it is less than worthless. He predicts earthquakes where similar earthquakes strike all the time; any fool could make those kind of predictions and using the Moon as a guide is really worthless.

reply to post by westcoast

I had noticed Shirakawas absence also

Only from this thread. He is on ATS right now.

Line 2

reply to post by RussianScientists

[shrug] Just thought I'd throw it out there.

Do I see right?

Station Info
Name: Pilgram Creek (NPS), Teton National Park, WY, USA
Code: I17A
Earthquake Info
Region: Yellowstone Region, Wyoming
Location: 44.6 N, 110.9 W
Magnitude: 3.1 ML
Time (GMT): 2010-02-03 02:31:46 AM
Depth: 5.0 km
Distance: 76.5 km

Earthquake view for Yellowstone Region, Wyoming earthquake

reply to post by Roald


That was in February.

hmmmmm link between sun and EQ?????

Abrupt downward solar activity fluctuations

02/03/2010 at 17:01 pm | 4.006 views | Universe | WWW.NIBURU.NL | Print

Every day we check the website via Solarcycle24.com activities that occur on and around the Sun Monday, March 1 fell on us so that, since February 27, the day of the severe earthquake in Chile, daily short sharp downward fluctuations occur in the solar activity.

A downward fluctuation in this case indicates that a temporary decline of solar activity is detected and is rare in such abrupt, brief manner. Normally activity decreases gradually or are there peaks (up) to see solar flares that reach the Earth's magnetosphere and marked with flux values from A to X (-flares). What is happening now is exactly the opposite.

The special is that it is suddenly occurs daily and it is even more special to mention that every day around the same time is, between 7:05 and 7:30 pm (UTC). Once an exception may be two days in succession might be coincidence, three days in a row is strange to call, but 4 days consecutively at the same times we can not simply blame it on luck.

What is going on here?

See below the Flux Diagrams


Day 3 data update interval 5 minutes (February 28 - March 2)


6 hr data update every minute (March 2 fluctuation 7:05-7:30 pm)


Dates between February 26 and March 2, 2010 - (Fluctuations cited by arrows indicate)

Sources:
Solarcycle24.com
Space Weather Prediction Center
Solar Soft
for the diagrams look here... dutch page...

www.niburu.nl...

reply to post by RussianScientists


Just watched the first video. I don't doubt you have some ideas that may in fact have merit, but you aren't doing a very good job explaining it. You go into this 15 minute, 30 minute, 45 minute, 30 minute, 15 minute cycle tangent without explaining what you're talking about? Pressure being detected? What pressure? Detectable by what?

Are you saying that five days before a quake you start to see pressure? You're making big leaps in topics without introducing the concepts behind them...

You need to start with the maco-level, then go to the granular level...

Something like, "In this video, I am going to talk about how very specific pressure that is detectable by X will be a precursor of an earthquake. I will discuss how to measure and detect this pressure and when this pressure begins. In future videos, I will suggest ways to analyze pressure and identify the source of pressure."

I'm utterly lost by the first three minutes of your first video. You have to be linear in your instruction. Explain a concept, then be specific in your lesson.

Hmmm What's going on at Yellowstone?

Yesterday there were 11 microquakes in the recent swarm area.
The area around the lake is like popcorn. At one point before and during the swarm, there were many times there was no other quakes anywhere in the park. There isn't a swarm, or mini-swarm, but there is something happening. Maybe just regular stuff. I think the moon is helpful understanding groundwater. Groundwater is helpful understanding earthquakes. I think the widespread subtle quakes are the caldera settling. The moon wanes and the crust is stretching out before napping again. This may be relatively boring with contstant small quakes here and there and everywhere. But this is Yellowstone and anything can happen as we found out on Feb 15th -17th. Hell, the bulge in the lake could decide to explode. Gesyers could change. I'm not expert, but beehive seemed very vigourous and regular. I just think it is a possbilty the 8.8M may have had an affect. It doesn't have to be a pretty map Puterman. Everything I do is crude. I'll understand.

Have you read the latest news?
The latest quake shifted the earths access.


The massive 8.8 earthquake that struck Chile may have changed the entire Earth's rotation and shortened the length of days on our planet, a NASA scientist said Monday.

The quake, the seventh strongest earthquake in recorded history, hit Chile Saturday and should have shortened the length of an Earth day by 1.26 milliseconds, according to research scientist Richard Gross at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.

Ok that makes 2 shifts on its access one 2 years ago form Sumatra and then the last just recently.

granted not much of a time change that we may think of, BUT, what other consequences might come due to this?

Is it possible that a change in the earths axis could create
I am not thinking of dooms day scenario, but thinking of cause and effect scenario.

for every reaction there is an equal and or greater reaction.
and I fear that there is a greater reaction soon to come. Be it Yellow stone or something else.. How ever it will go with out saying that all this happening, what effects will it have on Yellowstone? Could a sudden change in the earths axis start a catalyst that would end up in Yellowstone erupting? is there any scientific theories and or fact that could support such a claim?

Eh, maybe I am ...

reply to post by shutterbugw


Maybe a lame question, but I have followed this thread from the beginning... we had a 3.7 here on the New Madrid Fault today. If this thing decides to go off, wouldn't that have some serious effect on Yellowstone?