It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Whats going on at yellowstone?

page: 478
510
<< 475  476  477    479  480  481 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by quakewatcher
Well, that was cheerful.

Anyway... they don't update quakes under 2.0 on weekends, huh? So we probably won't see the vast majority of these showing up on the map until after the MLK holiday.

I continue to see little quakes on GEE but probably nothing we'll see plotted on the map. Guess we have to wait for the next weekly update for any actual word on what's happening in the park at large.


dont you mean their ever so annoying monthy updates? or that they only update the map of quakes weekly



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 05:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by quakewatcher
Well, that was cheerful.

Anyway... they don't update quakes under 2.0 on weekends, huh? So we probably won't see the vast majority of these showing up on the map until after the MLK holiday.

I continue to see little quakes on GEE but probably nothing we'll see plotted on the map. Guess we have to wait for the next weekly update for any actual word on what's happening in the park at large.


They won't update earthquakes so quickly, at least publicly.
Until they have been reviewed twice (notice how each earthquake is "Version #2") they don't get added to the public list, but I bet internally they're already working on them.

Unfortunately the fact that some of the bigger ones have appeared in the USGS M2.5+ world earthquake list means that this process will slow down, as Yellowstone attracts the attention of many people around the world and the YVO doesn't want too much of it, especially for such minor earthquakes. They can't avoid showing M2.5+ earthquakes, but they will delay showing as much as possible smaller ones.

Note: this is just my speculation based on my observations of YVO's efforts over the past year. After the December 2008/2009 earthquake swarm and the enormous attention they got all over the internet, their disclosure policies must have changed. Of course, we "savvy ones" can still figure out what's going on by using programs like GEE and reading public webicorders.

[edit on 2010-1-17 by Shirakawa]



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 05:30 PM
link   
Monthly, now, you are right. I haven't followed this thread closely since last January, but didn't the updates used to be weekly?

I'm sure you are right about taking a long time to plot the rest of the quakes. If you look at the YMR webicorder it's obvious there have been many, many more that aren't on the map:

quake.utah.edu...

(Although most look like they are sub 1 to 1.8 or so in magnitude.)



[edit on 17-1-2010 by quakewatcher]



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 05:44 PM
link   
This is a very rough estimate of every earthquake occurred since 20:00 UTC. I have counted very small ones too (probably negative magnitude). Each violet box is an earthquake:




posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 05:52 PM
link   
Based on what I see on the YMR webicorder right now, my hope is that someone has picked up the unit and is fiddling with it. Or, a big wind just came along.

That is my preferred explanation.

Edited to add: Oh it does look like that was just noise for a few minutes there. I've forgotten what that looks like, it's been so long since I've looked at these things regularly. I think there was a 2+ quake just before, though.

[edit on 17-1-2010 by quakewatcher]



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 06:00 PM
link   
reply to post by quakewatcher
 


I can see a similar signal on YGC station, but it's far away from YMR, so it shouldn't have much correlation with that.
Stations nearby YMR don't have such signal, though.
Unfortunately YMR is not available for public data streaming so I can't check in detail what's exactly. I don't think it's wind though.

It's possible that it's a local flow of some sort. Maybe steam/pressurized water coming out from a previously obstructed conduit.

[edit on 2010-1-17 by Shirakawa]



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 06:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Shirakawa
reply to post by quakewatcher
 


I can see a similar signal on YGC station, but it's far away from YMR.
Nearby station don't have such signal.
Unfortunately YMR is not available for public data streaming so I can't check in detail what's exactly. I don't think it's wind though.
It's possible that it's a flow of some sort. Maybe steam/pressurized water from a previously obstructed natural conduit.


Is this what you are talking about?
www.abovetopsecret.com...

There was a 2.7, a 2.6, and a 2.5, in that order.



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 06:06 PM
link   
reply to post by Phlynx
 


We were talking about a different thing which was clearly not an earthquake.
By the way, another EQ occurred right now, it looks the biggest so far, must be M2.7-M2.8.

[edit on 2010-1-17 by Shirakawa]



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 06:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phlynx

Originally posted by Shirakawa
reply to post by quakewatcher
 


I can see a similar signal on YGC station, but it's far away from YMR.
Nearby station don't have such signal.
Unfortunately YMR is not available for public data streaming so I can't check in detail what's exactly. I don't think it's wind though.
It's possible that it's a flow of some sort. Maybe steam/pressurized water from a previously obstructed natural conduit.


Is this what you are talking about?
www.abovetopsecret.com...

There was a 2.7, a 2.6, and a 2.5, in that order.


We know. (Dude, that was like, so 2 hours ago.) We're talking about what happened at the very tail end of a string of small quakes on the YMR webicorder, I think it was probably noise in the park somewhere, a series of vehicles going by possibly.



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 06:13 PM
link   
You were right, that was another big one. USGS says 2.7.

2.7
Date-Time
Monday, January 18, 2010 at 00:02:56 UTC
Sunday, January 17, 2010 at 05:02:56 PM at epicenter
Location
44.563°N, 110.972°W
Depth
11.3 km (7.0 miles)
Region
YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING
Distances
15 km (10 miles) SE (136°) from West Yellowstone, MT
30 km (19 miles) ENE (76°) from Island Park, ID
56 km (35 miles) SSW (201°) from Gardiner, MT
430 km (267 miles) N (10°) from Salt Lake City, UT
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 0.3 km (0.2 miles); depth +/- 0.6 km (0.4 miles)
Parameters
NST= 26, Nph= 26, Dmin=11 km, Rmss=0.16 sec, Gp= 83°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=0
Source
University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Event ID
uu00000308

That's four of mag 2.5+ now. All around 6-7 miles depth.



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 06:16 PM
link   
Well here we are again, I have been thinking that it was about time we say some activity of interest, and whalaa... with all the recent activity globally I am surprised it took this long.



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 06:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by quakewatcher

Originally posted by Phlynx

Originally posted by Shirakawa
reply to post by quakewatcher
 


I can see a similar signal on YGC station, but it's far away from YMR.
Nearby station don't have such signal.
Unfortunately YMR is not available for public data streaming so I can't check in detail what's exactly. I don't think it's wind though.
It's possible that it's a flow of some sort. Maybe steam/pressurized water from a previously obstructed natural conduit.


Is this what you are talking about?
www.abovetopsecret.com...

There was a 2.7, a 2.6, and a 2.5, in that order.


We know. (Dude, that was like, so 2 hours ago.) We're talking about what happened at the very tail end of a string of small quakes on the YMR webicorder, I think it was probably noise in the park somewhere, a series of vehicles going by possibly.


Oops. I hope this isn't anything to big.



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 07:05 PM
link   
My equake for firefox has picked up 4 earthquakes 2.5 or stronger in the passed 3 hrs.

Is this something to be worried about?



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 07:09 PM
link   
reply to post by Ear-Responsible
 


Actually not at all... unless you start seeing multiple M4.5-5.0+ earthquakes.
M2.5~2.7 earthquakes are still very small.
By the way, another M2.6-2.7ish one occurred as I'm writing.



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 07:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ear-Responsible
My equake for firefox has picked up 4 earthquakes 2.5 or stronger in the passed 3 hrs.

Is this something to be worried about?


Another similar one is coming in right now on GEE. I'll update this post when I get a magnitude.

Preliminary Report:

2.5
Date-Time
Monday, January 18, 2010 at 01:04:24 UTC
Sunday, January 17, 2010 at 06:04:24 PM at epicenter
Location
44.562°N, 110.975°W
Depth
9 km (5.6 miles)
Region
YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING
Distances
15 km (10 miles) SE (137°) from West Yellowstone, MT
30 km (18 miles) ENE (76°) from Island Park, ID
57 km (35 miles) NNE (29°) from Warm River, ID
430 km (267 miles) N (10°) from Salt Lake City, UT
Location Uncertainty
horizontal +/- 0.4 km (0.2 miles); depth +/- 1 km (0.6 miles)
Parameters
NST= 31, Nph= 31, Dmin=11 km, Rmss=0.21 sec, Gp= 47°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=0
Source
University of Utah Seismograph Stations
Event ID
uu00000322


I don't think any of us can say if it's anything to worry about any more than it was last year. Let's hope not. It is really disconcerting to see any earthquake swarms under a supervolcano, but these really are not big quakes. I am sure the geologists at the observatory are working on it, but we probably won't hear their thoughts until the swarm is over.





[edit on 17-1-2010 by quakewatcher]



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 07:11 PM
link   
Hmmm things seem to be indeed active, nice sized one just now, prob 2.5.3.0 also the smaller spikes on gee regestering on alot of stations proves to be not the wind, but smaller numerous earth quakes, i would not be surprized if we have seen over 100 earth quakes just today



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 07:14 PM
link   
Thought I'd re-join after being active on this thread during Yellowstone's swarms last year. My ears always prick up once I see little groups of 2+ being registered for Yellowstone.

What's the general consensus? Moon activity or is she chattering again?



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 07:16 PM
link   
This is worrisome.

Seems to be an awful lot of activity lately.

Watching....



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 07:22 PM
link   
Another

EDIT: Apologies, this one was posted just above... however USGS showing it as 2.6, not 2.5 as GEE showing..


2.6
Date-Time

* Monday, January 18, 2010 at 01:04:24 UTC
* Sunday, January 17, 2010 at 06:04:24 PM at epicenter

Location 44.562°N, 110.972°W
Depth 9 km (5.6 miles)
Region YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING
Distances

* 15 km (10 miles) SE (136°) from West Yellowstone, MT
* 30 km (19 miles) ENE (77°) from Island Park, ID
* 57 km (35 miles) NNE (29°) from Warm River, ID
* 430 km (267 miles) N (10°) from Salt Lake City, UT

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.3 km (0.2 miles); depth +/- 0.8 km (0.5 miles)
Parameters NST= 29, Nph= 29, Dmin=11 km, Rmss=0.16 sec, Gp= 83°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=2
Source

* University of Utah Seismograph Stations

Event ID uu00000322

[edit on 17-1-2010 by MoorfNZ]



posted on Jan, 17 2010 @ 07:23 PM
link   
reply to post by loam
 


That's still very tame compared to what happened on December 2008.

First day of the 2008/2009 earthquake swarm:
theinterveners.org...

Today's earthquake swarm:
theinterveners.org...

Note how much smaller are the earthquakes.




top topics



 
510
<< 475  476  477    479  480  481 >>

log in

join