ATS' Motto, Deny Ignorance,

Originally posted by DudeontheTube


The use of explosives does not prove an inside job, it proves inside explosives.

Right, and by your own logic on that answer couldn't you surmise that making money doesn't prove a conspiracy to make money? It just proves making money.

[edit on 12/21/2008 by ShAuNmAn-X]

Was that "words for the sake of words"? hey,
budda bing, a one line post

Originally posted by ShAuNmAn-X

Originally posted by DudeontheTube


The use of explosives does not prove an inside job, it proves inside explosives.

Right, and by your own logic on that answer couldn't you surmise that making money doesn't prove a conspiracy to make money? It just proves making money.

Right well, assuming you twist it in your head to suit then you might be on to something.

If you stop yourself from twisting the argument you will realize that it's not just making money. It's stepping on people to make money behind their backs. I suppose the phrase "back stabbing" is more appropriate.

Originally posted by DudeontheTube

Originally posted by lawlb0t
How about I go talk to the police, firemen and other civilians? Oh whats this? A commonality? Explosions in the basement?

The use of explosives does not prove an inside job, it proves inside explosives.

Were we not told that the building pancaked onto itself from fire?

Originally posted by DudeontheTube

The use of explosives does not prove an inside job, it proves inside explosives.

A does not equal B. But B equals A... ok got it.

Originally posted by lawlb0t

Originally posted by DudeontheTube

Originally posted by lawlb0t
How about I go talk to the police, firemen and other civilians? Oh whats this? A commonality? Explosions in the basement?

The use of explosives does not prove an inside job, it proves inside explosives.

Were we not told that the building pancaked onto itself from fire?

What would the repercussions be if it was common knowledge in which all government workers were so unprotected that bombs could be placed all over the structural framework of the office they go to every day, without a single person noticing?

Civil war. Worst than anything in the news today. Therefor, the government avoids such a conflict completely. Politicians lie, but they know way more than we ever will. It doesn't prove an inside job no matter which way you twist it.

Originally posted by DudeontheTube

Right well, assuming you twist it in your head to suit then you might be on to something.

If you stop yourself from twisting the argument you will realize that it's not just making money. It's stepping on people to make money behind their backs. I suppose the phrase "back stabbing" is more appropriate.

It's not backstabbing when we were all told about it. Did Jim Marrs and ATS hurt you? Is that why you are on this crusade against them? I fear that you may end up like Don Quixote, attacking windmills because you think they are giants.

Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by DudeontheTube

Seriously...I would let you choose the topic and the judges in an organized debate. I am okay with playing the guppy in a pool of sharks...because I don't think you're teeth are real...

That saying is awesome, and I am stealing it for my own use some day.

Figuring an oppurtunity arises...

P. S., this post is not off topic...

OK, maybe it was.

reply to post by DudeontheTube


It wasn't behind our backs, we were aware of it. Don't think that you flew in from the sky on wings of gold to reveal some great secret to us.

"Oh great Dude, deliver unto us the wisdom of which we already know."

Doesn't make much sense.

Originally posted by Osiris1953

Originally posted by DudeontheTube

The use of explosives does not prove an inside job, it proves inside explosives.

A does not equal B. But B equals A... ok got it.

Behold the professor of trigonometry... I believe you have your variables mixed young man.

Originally posted by DudeontheTube
. Politicians lie, but they know way more than we ever will.

Look, you're well on your way to your second conspiracy theory of the evening. Way to go, and you say you're not one of us.

reply to post by DudeontheTube

Here's a conspiracy for ya. You came in trying to be our savior and spewing BS to make us look to you that way? I think I found a new skunkworks thread "DudeontheTube is the antichrist" It would make about as much sense as this thread does. I feel that your rebellion will be crushed.

"Now witness the power of this fully armed and operational battle station!"

-Couldn't resist that one




[edit on 12/21/2008 by ShAuNmAn-X]

Originally posted by Osiris1953

Originally posted by DudeontheTube
. Politicians lie, but they know way more than we ever will.

Look, you're well on your way to your second conspiracy theory of the evening. Way to go, and you say you're not one of us.

Every morning the president is briefed with more knowledge on international conflicts than we hear about all year. I imagine that should be common knowledge, especially amongst those in America.

Originally posted by DudeontheTube

Originally posted by lawlb0t

Originally posted by DudeontheTube

Originally posted by lawlb0t
How about I go talk to the police, firemen and other civilians? Oh whats this? A commonality? Explosions in the basement?

The use of explosives does not prove an inside job, it proves inside explosives.

Were we not told that the building pancaked onto itself from fire?

What would the repercussions be if it was common knowledge in which all government workers were so unprotected that bombs could be placed all over the structural framework of the office they go to every day, without a single person noticing?


Ok, I'm done now after reading that. I cannot talk with this mammoth intellect. I will leave it to you smarter and stronger people. This statement slayed me, I'm spent.

[edit on 12/21/08 by scooterstrats]

Originally posted by DudeontheTube
It doesn't prove an inside job no matter which way you twist it.

And your argument doesn't prove a conspiracy no matter how you twist it. You are trying to escape into other things stay on the topic at hand. Where is the conspiracy in ATS making money or Jim Marrs book?
If I wanted to hear about how 9/11 was/wasn't an inside job, I'd shoot over to the 9/11 forums. Dodging the topic at hand is not helping your argument.

reply to post by DudeontheTube


Ok, I'm done now after reading that. I cannot talk with this mammoth intellect. I will leave it to you smarter and stronger people. This statement slayed me, I'm spent.

[edit on 12/21/08 by scooterstrats]

Originally posted by ShAuNmAn-X

Originally posted by DudeontheTube
It doesn't prove an inside job no matter which way you twist it.

And your argument doesn't prove a conspiracy no matter how you twist it. You are trying to escape into other things stay on the topic at hand. Where is the conspiracy in ATS making money or Jim Marrs book?
If I wanted to hear about how 9/11 was/wasn't an inside job, I'd shoot over to the 9/11 forums. Dodging the topic at hand is not helping your argument.

I have not dodged anything in fact the reason I am talking about 9/11 is to answer a proposed question. Guess what? Your up next.

Your right it doesn't prove a conspiracy - that was not my intention. It proves a fact. ATS members have been transformed into money before your eyes, and how many realized it?

Originally posted by DudeontheTube
Your right it doesn't prove a conspiracy - that was not my intention. It proves a fact. ATS members have been transformed into money before your eyes, and how many realized it?

Well if that's the case then by your logic haven't you helped "them" by joining and adding to the "problem"?

reply to post by DudeontheTube


Actually a good portion of us realize it. If it means that it will allow for this site to continue to grow, evolve into something more complex, and help the people who work seven days a week (with a lot of sleepless nights) make a buck, and get our opinions to the general masses it seems like a pretty good idea to me. I wouldn't be here if I thought otherwise.

Originally posted by ShAuNmAn-X

Well if that's the case then by your logic haven't you helped "them" by joining and adding to the "problem"?

That has been my point all along. I don't get this continued rant.