Another NASA employee comes forward - 8-9 Foot Alien Sighted

Originally posted by thrashee

Originally posted by nexusmagazine
Clark is broke, and is trying to get some money to stay alive. I deal with the guy from time to time, and he is the real deal. He might be cantankerous, but he is not a liar. He is sitting on heaps more stuff, but won't reveal things that will get him or others still alive into trouble.

Duncan

Then why is he even bothering with all of this at all? If he's broke and has all of this information that he can't reveal, why is he trying to make money off that information

Think about it. The sane thing to do is go get a job and forget all about this nonsense.

At his age, no one is going to offer him a job - get real!

And why shouldn't he try to sell his story to the media - especially after Edgar Mitchell just came out with a whammy?

Clark is the real deal - he is who he says he is, and he doesn't tell lies. Get over it!

Duncan

Originally posted by SL55T0T0
What sort of alien was it

reptilian, nordic, mantis

This:

farm2.static.flickr.com...

Seriously.

The real question is:

How does a 9 foot tall alien take a dump in the Space Shuttle?

I'm serious folks. This is a valid question.

[edit on 31-7-2008 by AntisepticSkeptic]

Originally posted by Astroplasma
reply to post by nexusmagazine

 

That is my impression as well. I just don't see the commercial potential in his testimony. This is just a casual observation, but if he was solely concerned with money, wouldn't it make more "financial sense" to create and market a story of more substance and intrigue? (IE Serpo, Dulce wars, etc.) Or even simple, old-fashioned, Alex Jones-style fear and paranoia? Am I making sense? I am new to this subject, forgive me, but the way this is developing (in context with Edgar Mitchell's statements and others) makes sense to me. Perhaps I am naive...

[edit on 30-7-2008 by Astroplasma]

There is no commercial potential in his latest testimony, I've told him this, but he is of the old school mentality and doesn't see it my way.

Clark emailed me a few days ago, asking for one thousand dollars for a 'hot story'.
I emailed back asking what it was, and he referred me to his website. I asked him why on earth would I pay one grand for a story that tens of thousands of people have already read? Did he have anything further in mind for me? - nope - just a graphic (which I have not seen).

I've dealt with Clark several times over the years - the old guy is just super broke and destitute - and cantankerous. However, he is NOT a liar or a fraud.

I've refused to pay for what everyone else is reading for free, and no doubt he will be cranky at me for it - but hey, that's is how he has made his bed on this one.

Duncan

reply to post by AntisepticSkeptic


(I choose to respond to this sincerely.)

To provide assistance in some capacity? If you accept the story, I thought that was obvious. Again, that is why, to me, it is unlikely this is simply a hoax. Why not go for it? You can make a quicker, easier, more substantial buck crafting more elaborate tales than this. You should hear some of mine

It is possible Mr. McClelland has been manipulated in some way. In that case, he gains even more of my sympathy.

[edit on 30-7-2008 by Astroplasma]

reply to post by nexusmagazine


I edited my post to include: "if he was solely concerned with money." Badly worded on my part - I was actually trying to support you, Nexusmagazine

Originally posted by nexusmagazine
At his age, no one is going to offer him a job - get real!

Walmart comes to mind.

And why shouldn't he try to sell his story to the media - especially after Edgar Mitchell just came out with a whammy?

I didn't say he shouldn't try to sell it. I said it makes no sense that he's trying to sell a story that relies upon information that he's too afraid to disclose. Tell me the logic in that.

Clark is the real deal - he is who he says he is, and he doesn't tell lies. Get over it!

So I'm to just assume that you're telling the truth that he's telling the truth because you say so.

Gotcha

[edit on 30-7-2008 by thrashee]

[edit on 30-7-2008 by thrashee]

[edit on 30-7-2008 by thrashee]

reply to post by chetinglendalevillage


Finding out if he is in foreclosure might shore up the idea that he really is broke.

I work at a Foreclosure company that has the best data in the industry. Someone get me his address and I can find this information out asap.

I was pretty excited, and cautiously optimistic until I started reading all the "I want money" ploys. If he really wants to share his knowledge because it's life-changing for the human race, he wouldn't want to be paid.

Dr. Edgar Mitchell Sets Record Straight
www.ufodigest.com...
Read his interview before you use him as a source. He only tells the owrld what he believes not what he knows.

[edit on 30-7-2008 by riggs2099]

reply to post by RiotComing
i believe you i have seen alot of stuff in the sky i can't explane.the other day i saw somethine hover 3miles away from my then shoot into the atmisphere fast....

gosh it preety sad i know alot of stuff that i can get killed for knowing and i'm onley 15

All you freaking believers are just to dense and will believe anything that comes your way. I want to believe that there are things out there, but there is not enough evidence, just theories on who is the cause of everything. Edgar Mtchell tells the world what he believes and not what he has seen personally.

Proof?

Where art thou proof?

Since this is breaking news, there is is no harm in seeing where he will take his claims. But you cannot deny this is one of the most interesting recent developments in a long time.

reply to post by riggs2099


Thank you for the link. He expresses himself a little more clearly in that interview. He only has an official opinion on the Roswell incident:

"Well, that the crash of an alien spacecraft in the Roswell area was a real event and much of the lore, I can't say all of the lore, but much of the fact that dead bodies were recovered and live ones were recovered, that they were not of this world, was the story."

Does it not seem as if he is also aware of the tough position some NASA personnel might be in? Or are they really so compartmentalized that they know about as much as the average control tower radar reader?

reply to post by riggs2099


Thanks for the update.

A little off topic, but I already commented on the OP.

Does anyone have the transcript of the interview with EM just a while back? We can take a look and see if he was misquoted or is changing the story all of a sudden.

Just a vibe, but it seemed to me that during that interview he went out of his way to disconnect NASA to his earlier comments...possbily rightfully so, if he was mis-quoted the first time; if he wasn't mis-quoted, then he's pulling a big 180.

Before anyone gets on my case...I too have witnessed UFO's. That is why I am on here to find some answers. I have seen these things so I believe in them but I have no proof that they are alien controlled, I only witnessed objects that to me are unidentified. I consider myself to be a skeptical believer. I have many arguements on here with skeptics and believers, both have thier guys who are unwilling to look at anything else. These are the guys I have a problem with. It is very pigheaded to have made a decision on the subject and then to tell everyone else they are wrong without all the evidence being in.

Originally posted by AntisepticSkeptic
The real question is: How would a 9 foot tall alien takes a dump in the Space Shuttle? I'm serious folks. This is a valid question.

According to Lawrence R. Spencer's 'Alien Interview' book, some alien species are not biological creatures by definition. Their physical bodies are containers for their consciousness. Many, like the beings that crashed at Roswell, were 'doll bodies' bereft of a digestion or reproduction system as we know it. The lower classes of beings (like ourselves and other biological creatures) are assigned 'flesh bodies', which can withstand only a very limited spectrum of temperatures and physical effects. The development of biological bodies began in the universe 74 trillion years ago according to the Alien Interview book.

Now you can write it off as hogwash, and I'm not saying I believe the book (I don't), but it certainly turns the idea of religion (the idea of a single God going around creating everything) on its head. The book says that religion was implemented as a device to enslave and deceive us. Interestingly, it describes in great detail the 'soul catcher' theory that John Lear subscribed to, and has been long derided for its apparent absurdity. Clark McClelland is a good friend of John Lear, by the way.

I'm thinking, what if everything we thought we knew about our universe is completely wrong? What if the likes of John Lear, Clark McClelland, are NOT disinfo agents and are actually completely truthful to the best of their knowledge? The old ways of teaching, the old paradigms, people unable to get used to the idea of a 9 foot space alien in a Top Secret shuttle mission. What if all this is true? Will the AntisepticSkeptics of this world ever get used to such notions? True disclosure probably would never happen, because the truth may be beyond the pale on a magnitude the ordinary folk of this world, living in their own self-created reality, have no hope in fathoming.


[edit on 30-7-2008 by RiotComing]

reply to post by RiotComing


Why should we discount one belief and then accept another. Alien intelligence here is a belief and not fact; there is one GOD is a belief and not fact. What makes one more credible than the other, both claim to have evidence to support thier claim. Both will tell you that there are witnesses and others who have experienced this phenomenon. Both sides have thier Believers that will give us links to youtube and other websites to use as evidence. SO TELL ME WHY IS ONE MORE CREDIBLE THAN THE OTHER.

reply to post by riggs2099

It's simple, because people have witnessed physical proof. Yourself included.

reply to post by RiotComing

You may not want to use the Alien Interview book as a something that helps your cause because that book tells that everything you believe in is false. I consider it to be total B.S. myself, and I know you said you may not believe it. You can't believe it because it goes against what you have been debating about on this site. It tells us that aliens do not want to be seen and that we are a planet where no other species want to visit because we considered a planet that is used as a garbage pile. They use us as a place to get rid of thier undesirable.