It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by solo1
I don't wish to diminish the importance of the story but I just wish for once they would come forward before they became old and senile
Originally posted by caballero
reply to post by Tha Joker
The Joker once said "if your good at something dont do it for free" this is the same basic idea, this guy has HUGE news and he wants some money for it. Nothing out of the ordinary there, just greed.
Originally posted by GreyFoxSolid
Wait a second- Most of you are basically telling me that this guy is credible because he says he is. Personally I have never heard of this man. I don't even know how to look him up (maybe I will try after I am finished writing this).
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by triplesod
That's the real World mate. People need to survive and to do that they do something that people will pay money for, it is perfectly natural and doesn't at all take away from his statement. It is quite unfair and very cynical to accuse him of anything underhanded just because he wants payment for his work.
EDIT: I will say though that Mr McClelland has published book/s on the subject of UFOlogy. He is possibly (probably?) in the process of publishing one right now
If he honestly had proof that ETs had been in direct contact with NASA then he'd know that he wouldn't have to beg for the money. He'd know he'd be showered in cash for appearances on every talk show from now to judgement day. His claim as to why he was terminated stinks big time. A secret giant object hurtling towards us at high fractions of c for at least the last 15 years and only NASA has noticed? Not buying it. At the very least, if he's being honest he should arrange it so that his being paid is contigent on there being solid proof. In other words, publishing it in something like a book. If he's being honest and his evidence is sound then it'll be an instant best seller and he'll be much richer than just $500 bucks a hit from each media outlet. As it stands he could be totally BS'ing everything and he'd still be paid quite well for it, even if it was a total lie without a shred of evidence.
[edit on 30-7-2008 by ngchunter]
Originally posted by nexusmagazine
Clark is broke, and is trying to get some money to stay alive. I deal with the guy from time to time, and he is the real deal. He might be cantankerous, but he is not a liar. He is sitting on heaps more stuff, but won't reveal things that will get him or others still alive into trouble.
Duncan