CNN: Video of UFO craft destroying missile nuke flying through the sky!

Originally posted by red 5
wht evidence was in this show?

Red,
Your repeated statement/question makes me wonder what you think evidence is, so I've included the common meanings below for you. But to answer your question, all of the statements about what the guests personally did or witnessed was relevant evidence.
In the Larry King show the witnesses all provided evidence by way of verbal testimony. (If you want to quibble that it was not sworn under penalty of perjury, you are just being obtuse, disingenuous, or are really naive about the effect of an oath on a liar.) They stated what they did, what they saw, and gave a number of details to support their statements.
For more evidence look up the Gordon Cooper (he was one of the “Right Stuff” astronauts) interview where he talks about filming a flying saucer land while jet pilots were practicing. His testimony is direct, clear, and certain. Note also that the incident occurred before he became an astronaut – if he were a liar or had a loose screw he would have been booted from the program.
For more evidence watch the Disclosure Project, or at least the National Press Club News Conference, where each and every witness stated that they would sign declarations affirming what they were saying, and would provide sworn testimony in front of congress regarding their statements.

You may judge it differently than I, but all of this testimony is evidence and quite compelling.

Regards

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
ev·i·dence –noun
1. that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.
2. something that makes plain or clear; an indication or sign: His flushed look was visible evidence of his fever.
3. Law. data presented to a court or jury in proof of the facts in issue and which may include the testimony of witnesses, records, documents, or objects.
–verb (used with object)
4. to make evident or clear; show clearly; manifest: He evidenced his approval by promising his full support.
5. to support by evidence: He evidenced his accusation with incriminating letters.
—Idiom
6. in evidence, plainly visible; conspicuous: The first signs of spring are in evidence.
California Code - "Evidence" means testimony, writings, material objects, or other things presented to the senses that are offered to prove the existence or nonexistence of a fact.
Federal Code - "Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.

reply to post by Pocky


Wow...

If someone was to only read the transcript, I can understand how they would get a lot of the context wrong. The interruptions don't really look like interruptions and the general tone is not set since from the beginning it looks like Larry is guiding them yet he was actually listening to them.


Great...


Peace and Love

I thought I should tell you that it's 2:36am central U.S. time and the videos were just pulled, haha, go figure

This is becoming way to mainstream for my liking. It is obvious to me our 'friends' have plans for us. Including not blowing each other to bits. And proving they can do it.

My question is, why is the guy from SETI representing the debunker / skeptic side?

Surely he is on the believer side of the fence?

Or is SETI not interested in going out of business / relevancy any time soon?

Does anyone remember that London 2012 UFO false-flag attack article that was on here a while ago?

I'm wondering if anyone else thinks that the recent influx of UFO reports might be to do with what that article suggests. In other words this is bull# to prep us for a false-flag UFO attack at the London 2012 Olympics and then to unite us under a one world government against UFO's.

wow great post! star and flag for sure..

I am starting to feel more and more that the government is pushing what we're starting to see on CNN: Larry King as an example.. where there shedding light on alot of this... but im starting to think that they're not threatened at all about stuff like this.. because although compelling and believable... "they" know theres enough crazy vocal sceptics to stir the pot and not let total belief take hold... im not sure how it needs to be done (disclosure I mean) but I dont think anything is gonna work when its broadcast to millions of people.. because then its all about perception.. its not a personal message that you can interact with and really strengthen your belief.. because so many people watch it.. im sure you hear comments saying its BS and this and that.. so it creates the tiniest bit of doubt and/or fear.. it actually works to there advantage somehow I think... im not the best at writing as you can tell, im not knocking the video at all just giving my thoughts... this is the best news broadcast of credible witnesses and such on the subject I have ever seen

GREAT POST! Thanks for bring this to my attention

Originally posted by Jinni
It's total rubbish.

The SOFTWARE in the missiles experienced COMMON CAUSE SYSTEMATIC FAILURE. Why all missiles? Because they all probably had the same software and the conditions that triggered the systematic fault was the same for all failed missiles.

That is not correct Jinni, because each missile bunker is basically self-supporting so they are complete separated from each other, so that can’t happen.

As I was relating this to him our missiles started shutting down one by one. By shutting down, I mean they went into a "no-go" condition meaning they could not be launched. So we get bells and whistles - a red light no-go condition…
These weapons were Minuteman One missiles and were of course nuclear-tipped warhead missiles.
There was no viable explanation for this [shutdown of multiple ICBMs]. Each missile is basically self-supporting. Most of them are powered by commercial power but each missile has its own power generator…

www.topsecrettestimony.com...

reply to post by Pocky


man there not even letting Bill Nye talk man... there attacking HIM not the other way around.. gimme a break.. I had alot of faith in all those guys from the Disclosure Project before seeing this video.. after seeing that attack on Bill Nye and I was thinking the same thing he was and they wouldn't let em talk.. even King was siding with the other guys a bit... they were making FUN of him... Bill Nye didnt attack either one of them personally... im having my doubts on these Disclosure Project witnesses shown on that video right now......

reply to post by Pocky


It's the Russians...they had alien technology years beofre we did...but the U.S. military is too embarrassed to come clean about another country being able to fly in and out of our airspace untouched

It does not get much better..

If you wanted to know..now you do..if you want to deny you can do that too..BUT the facts are out there and indisputable. Bill Nye the straw man set up to be knocked down..his arguments were transparent and ridiculous.

Do You Still Need To Be Told?

This is Childhoods End. How has your worldview changed?
What will you do differently today? I am one of the fortunate ones who has SEEN objects that defy conventional aircraft in scale and operation. I saw evidence which made me believe. The learning curve for a lot of the world is going to be much steeper and more difficult than my own. I don't need CONFIRMATION or DISCLOSURE from the GOVERNMENT..I have seen all I need to see to believe.
The question I still have is WHATS NEXT? I am still waiting along with everyone else for the next move..SIX DECADES is a Long time to wait.

reply to post by ToolFanMael


Mm. So the fact that Bill Nye is indirectly, yet purposefully, calling the man who saw the UFO over the nuclear missiles base a liar does not seem to you as a very bad first step for his argumentative endeavour?

Then, he proceeded to make rhetorical and inappropriate-to-the-conversation comments regarding the facts which are being SHOWN to him. He refuted the testimony of the man (I forget his name) who was in charge of filming the 3-stage missile launch by saying that the video was possibly tampered with.

O.k. so maybe the video was tampered so the government could plant a seed of deceit in someone they knew could disclose the information. If you hold this possibility as real, then you are challenging the man's ability at his own field of work which is video imaging. Personally, it's unlikely a man of his statute wouldn't have seen the difference.

Bill Nye proceeded the whole time to set himself apart, essentially, of the rest of the crowd so as to provide a false image of alienation due to difference of opinions. Since he walked in the first place with that attitude, the other guys obviously knew what he was up to and just referred to setting him in his place.

I also had a curious idea:

I think Bill Nye was paid to be the hardcore skeptic he portrayed. Also, I'm sure the scientists and Larry King got some inside information about this and were prepared to deal with him as they did because they knew he would be talking nonchalantly.


Peace and Love

[edit on 23-7-2008 by sllapur]

[edit on 23-7-2008 by sllapur]

Wernher von Braun.

"First it will be communists, then terrorists, then rouge states, then astroids and finally aliens.They will then have what they need to create panic and weaponise space".

Thats the quote from the man who should know.

"And remember Carol, the last card is the alien card. We are going to have to build space-based weapons against aliens and all of it is a lie."

Von Braun quote

As for the video from larry King, starred and flagged.

Originally posted by tiger_tts
reply to post by Promecus

 

I appreciate that you ID your thoughts as speculation. ( I wish S. Freidman would stick to calling his thoughts speculation when discussing something other than evidence.)

I speculate that if the evidence showing UFO visitation for at least several hundred years is correct, that the UFO operators have had the means and technology to do whatever they have wanted to us for that long as well. There would be no reasonable reason to wait for us to get "advanced" technology and then stop it just so they could have access to some resource. They could have wiped us out a long time ago with a simple virus if that was the case. If they wanted to harm us, I think they would have already.

I also speculate that there is no unique resource here, (just exploded star matter like everywhere else). I just think that we are different and interesting. My basis for this speculation is totally self centered - when I got my first tricycle, I rode it around my block. When I got a bike I rode it around the neighborhood. When I got a car I drove everywhere I could. If I had a plane I'd fly all over the world. If I had a space ship I'd be off as far as it would take me.

Ah, you make a great point here. But this also raises a question. Could they be farming here?

Is it my imagination or are more and more people coming out with their stories about UFO's.
There are more and more sightings every day.
What does this mean?
Is it getting close to the time for ET to present himself/selfs?

I have been saying for years at every chance I get that space if other sentient beings exist has to be full of politics and probably if at least one party has developed FTL travel then if this party or parties can achieve access in vastly large amounts of distances across space, then we could assume we might live in a world surrounded by space which is indeed full of politics and we can't escape this. It wouldn't matter where WE are, politics can come to us in a blink of an eye if a need arises.
Sometime we are going to be drawn in to this full time and in full contact.

Now that our technological levels have advanced and we appear as a society in the bring of effective space travel and if the info on these videos is true, it seems that are presented with evidence of highly technological forces in our immediate vicinity. Also we might say that these forces or some of them have been going out of their way, according to the intel we get, to display that their own levels of technology especialy in the military field is more advanced than ours.

By the nature of war and conquest, as we experience in our own world, any party that owns superior technological force has to conquer by any means any other parties with a lower status.
Whoever these guys are if they are for real, and If they chose to target weapons not affecting any direct outcome of a given confrontation between earth parties, and they do not seem they prefer civilian infrastructure, hospitals, or large civilian population centers as their targets, it is good enough for any sound and logical person to assume that these guys must be operating in a state of a live and let live philosophy. Can it be any other way?

Now like any given situation on earth, space itself has to be full of any walks of life, some of them probably good, some of them probably bad, I would suggest the safest approach for us is to first get in contact with those, to make a move to approach these guys that seem to like messing with our nukes, like disabling them. I know this kind of approach would be a bit hard for militarists to swallow concerning their ego and stuff but there are much bigger things here at play. They must be. After all these guys probably are only trying to get our attention, maybe just maybe is for a good cause, because a whole different ball game is played out there and maybe THEY KNOW things we are oblivious about. I would suggest we take that risk.

Now the main problem of reaching for a public opinion considering these matters is that mainly the UFO community is full of crackpots, weirdows, false theorists, dissinfo agents, and.. you name it, swallowing or disseminating every damn crazy theory there is about greys, pleiadians, reptilians, blue pills red pills, orange pills and all that crazy stuff we hear. Science has to deal with UFOs. Science won't interact with any community full of what I describe above.
That last guy on the video was right after all.
I say the UFO community will have to get rid of the woowoo's if they want to be taken seriously from science. Situations will present themselves in the future probably for scientific establishment and the UFO community to interact, but not today.

The UFO community might be full of really important people, and we could be living in really important times, important people in important times usually end up making history. Sometimes this is inevitable too.
It is sad that this community is being held hostage by common psychopaths.

reply to post by spacebot



I disagree. Science will have to rid itself of its 'woo woos' before it can be taken seriously.

I mean come on, some of their stuff is not even funny.

Originally posted by Phazon
Does anyone remember that London 2012 UFO false-flag attack article that was on here a while ago?

I'm wondering if anyone else thinks that the recent influx of UFO reports might be to do with what that article suggests. In other words this is bull# to prep us for a false-flag UFO attack at the London 2012 Olympics and then to unite us under a one world government against UFO's.

These guys out there, in London taking decisions on their own for the rest of us, like they were doing in the start of WWII, often tend to consider their own goals first, if there is nothing to be gained for them, I doubt they would take the time to deal with anything. Who knows, maybe this time its not Hitler, its the aliens, according to their own logic. The WWII outcome might have turned positive to the rest of us, but I feel we really don't know if it was just damn luck. To tell you the truth I never trusted London for anything.

reply to post by Dan Tanna


I agree, but at least you can threaten a scientist with lawsuits.

[edit on 23-7-2008 by spacebot]

This is great, no real answers, but more he said, he said stuff. Good try Larry, Just a story to help the ratings.

"In 1964 you were still trying to work out what girls were". Someone give that man a cookie, I've been laughing for 3 minutes straight. It was a nice debate, my personal unbiased opinion is that the believers came out on top.

star + flag