It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Originally posted by Jinni
It's total rubbish.
The SOFTWARE in the missiles experienced COMMON CAUSE SYSTEMATIC FAILURE. Why all missiles? Because they all probably had the same software and the conditions that triggered the systematic fault was the same for all failed missiles.
That is not correct Jinni, because each missile bunker is basically self-supporting so they are complete separated from each other, so that can’t happen.
As I was relating this to him our missiles started shutting down one by one. By shutting down, I mean they went into a "no-go" condition meaning they could not be launched. So we get bells and whistles - a red light no-go condition…
These weapons were Minuteman One missiles and were of course nuclear-tipped warhead missiles.
There was no viable explanation for this [shutdown of multiple ICBMs]. Each missile is basically self-supporting. Most of them are powered by commercial power but each missile has its own power generator…
www.topsecrettestimony.com...
Originally posted by Jinni
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Originally posted by Jinni
It's total rubbish.
The SOFTWARE in the missiles experienced COMMON CAUSE SYSTEMATIC FAILURE. Why all missiles? Because they all probably had the same software and the conditions that triggered the systematic fault was the same for all failed missiles.
That is not correct Jinni, because each missile bunker is basically self-supporting so they are complete separated from each other, so that can’t happen.
As I was relating this to him our missiles started shutting down one by one. By shutting down, I mean they went into a "no-go" condition meaning they could not be launched. So we get bells and whistles - a red light no-go condition…
These weapons were Minuteman One missiles and were of course nuclear-tipped warhead missiles.
There was no viable explanation for this [shutdown of multiple ICBMs]. Each missile is basically self-supporting. Most of them are powered by commercial power but each missile has its own power generator…
www.topsecrettestimony.com...
What are you talking about?
I'm talking about software failure not hardware!
*sigh*
In the morning of March 16, 1967 where 16 nuclear missiles simultaneously became non-operational at two different launch facilities immediately after guards saw UFO’s hovering above.
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Originally posted by Jinni
Originally posted by spacevisitor
Originally posted by Jinni
It's total rubbish.
The SOFTWARE in the missiles experienced COMMON CAUSE SYSTEMATIC FAILURE. Why all missiles? Because they all probably had the same software and the conditions that triggered the systematic fault was the same for all failed missiles.
That is not correct Jinni, because each missile bunker is basically self-supporting so they are complete separated from each other, so that can’t happen.
As I was relating this to him our missiles started shutting down one by one. By shutting down, I mean they went into a "no-go" condition meaning they could not be launched. So we get bells and whistles - a red light no-go condition…
These weapons were Minuteman One missiles and were of course nuclear-tipped warhead missiles.
There was no viable explanation for this [shutdown of multiple ICBMs]. Each missile is basically self-supporting. Most of them are powered by commercial power but each missile has its own power generator…
www.topsecrettestimony.com...
What are you talking about?
I'm talking about software failure not hardware!
*sigh*
I am talking about the following.
In the morning of March 16, 1967 where 16 nuclear missiles simultaneously became non-operational at two different launch facilities immediately after guards saw UFO’s hovering above.
Testimony of Capt. Robert Salas US airforce December 2000.
Source; The book Disclosure of Dr. Steven Greer.
So it where at two different launch facilities, so forget that software failure was the reason.
*sigh sigh*
Originally posted by Outlawstar
This was really great, that "scientist" really summed up science as of today, I mean have you ever encountereed such childish denial and ignorance, and I frikin cant stand the patronizing attitude of seth shostack, I mean hes at the head of SETI, youd think his enthusiasm would outstrip all on this matter.
But no, as far as Im concerned, SETI, just like NASA, is merely a smokescreen programme, feeding eth public BULL#.
Originally posted by dragonseeker
Originally posted by Outlawstar
This was really great, that "scientist" really summed up science as of today, I mean have you ever encountereed such childish denial and ignorance, and I frikin cant stand the patronizing attitude of seth shostack, I mean hes at the head of SETI, youd think his enthusiasm would outstrip all on this matter.
But no, as far as Im concerned, SETI, just like NASA, is merely a smokescreen programme, feeding eth public BULL#.
This was great stuff.. I'm coming to realize, now, how many agents of disinformation are seeded in our media..and SETI has always been a joke. any civilization capable of interplanetary travel as displayed here, isn't broadcasting on the frequencies SETI scans, and SETI knows that.