It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AldarKose
a reply to: TerryDon79
toolbox, always the toolbox.. Im always gonna reference freemasons to their toolbox... thats my reference.. Or if you see a painter with a hammer and he calls it a bucket.. Do you think its an Ice cream? Thats about how logical it is when you say its older..
originally posted by: AldarKose
a reply to: TerryDon79
Jacobs ladder all the 72 steps.. Lesser keys 72, if it didnt have a reference until it came in a book.. Did it exist? sufism 72 virgins, maybe i can cross reference freemasonry till the 7th century? How about King Solomon ? Naaah, im gonna say you guys are from around the 18th 19th century.. Or you make bold claims.. which no actual facts than stories..
Important you guys keep up to rules and boundaries..
The earliest surviving records of these are the laws and ordinances of the lodge at York Minster in 1352
It should be noted that these regulations were imposed by the Dean and Chapter of the Minster
Regius poem came to the attention of Freemasonry much later, this oversight being mainly due to the librarian David Casley, who described it as "a Poem of Moral Duties" when he catalogued it in 1734.
The Matthew Cooke Manuscript is the second oldest of the Old Charges or Gothic Constitutions of Freemasonry, and the oldest known set of charges to be written in prose. It contains some repetition, but compared to the Regius there is also much new material, much of which is repeated in later constitutions
Unlike the majority of the old constitutions, which are written on rolls, the Cooke manuscript is written on sheets of vellum, four and three-eighth inches high and three and three eighth inches broad (112mm x 86mm) bound into a book, still retaining its original oak covers. The manuscript was published by R. Spencer, London, in 1861 when it was edited by Mr. Matthew Cooke — hence the name. In the British Museum's catalogue it is listed as "Additional M.S. 23,198", and is now dated to 1450 or thereabouts, although errors in Cooke's transcription caused it originally to be dated to after 1482
Recent analysis of the Middle English of the document date it to the same period as the writing, around 1450, implying that the source or sources from which it was copied were almost contemporary with the Cooke, and contemporary with, or only slightly later than the Regius poem. It was probably composed in the West Midlands, near to the origin of the Regius in Shropshire. The historian Andrew Prescott sees both the Regius and Cooke manuscripts as part of the struggle of mediaeval masons to determine their own pay, particularly after the statute of 1425 banning assemblies of masons. Masons sought to show that their assemblies had royal approval, and added the detail that the King's son had become a mason himself
Masons sought to show that their assemblies had royal approval, and added the detail that the King's son had become a mason himself
In France, the 1737 lecture of Chevalier Ramsay added the crusaders to the lineage. He maintained that Crusader Masons had revived the craft with secrets recovered in the Holy Land, under the patronage of the Knights Hospitaller. At this point, the “history” of the craft in Continental Freemasonry diverged from that in England.
. At this point, the “history” of the craft in Continental Freemasonry diverged from that in England.
originally posted by: AldarKose
a reply to: TerryDon79
Are you a freemason?
originally posted by: AldarKose
a reply to: TerryDon79
Then join freemasonry take the creed, so you can tell me like Master Cthulhu on ATS to f*** off, he does that on a regular basis..