It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TzarChasm
Masonry as no official opinion on just about everything, including your question. That really should be addressed to each individual Mason you meet as they may all have differing points of view on particular subjects.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TzarChasm
Masonry as no official opinion on just about everything, including your question. That really should be addressed to each individual Mason you meet as they may all have differing points of view on particular subjects.
funny that you should answer the question. perhaps this is the more appropriate place to continue our previous discussion. i was speaking on the "higher being" requirement to become a mason. your response suggested that somehow the freemasons believe investment in a higher being is a bulletin point for upstanding citizens. i am wondering where they got this impression and how it became a part of regulations.
He was given the honorary 33rd because he actually earned it.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
funny that you should answer the question. perhaps this is the more appropriate place to continue our previous discussion. i was speaking on the "higher being" requirement to become a mason. your response suggested that somehow the freemasons believe investment in a higher being is a bulletin point for upstanding citizens. i am wondering where they got this impression and how it became a part of regulations.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TzarChasm
Masonry as no official opinion on just about everything, including your question. That really should be addressed to each individual Mason you meet as they may all have differing points of view on particular subjects.
funny that you should answer the question. perhaps this is the more appropriate place to continue our previous discussion. i was speaking on the "higher being" requirement to become a mason. your response suggested that somehow the freemasons believe investment in a higher being is a bulletin point for upstanding citizens. i am wondering where they got this impression and how it became a part of regulations.
There is another thread that questions this, regarding blood RH factors; and may help (although off the wall). The RH negative question? Who rules the world? the Blue Bloods. My Grandfather was RH A negative. Lizard (blueblood). Obsessed with finding Gold/precious metals (a tried and true Knights Templar reincarnation). FreeMasons have forgotten their reason to be; why they are here. Perhaps their resonant time (as being influential) at all regarding anything of importance has passed (do not collect 200 dollars and pass GO as no longer relevant) because a higher presence or being is not acknowledged as supreme anymore.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: TzarChasm
funny that you should answer the question. perhaps this is the more appropriate place to continue our previous discussion. i was speaking on the "higher being" requirement to become a mason. your response suggested that somehow the freemasons believe investment in a higher being is a bulletin point for upstanding citizens. i am wondering where they got this impression and how it became a part of regulations.
Not at all. My answer was very clear on that, the requirement of Regular Masonry in belief in a Supreme Being is that we feel our Obligations are meaningless unless we acknowledge that there is something larger than ourselves to whom we committed them.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: TzarChasm
Not large enough.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: vethumanbeing
Makes total sense, lizards and blood types. Put down the Davis Icke, go outside and experience the real world.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: TzarChasm
how do they come to that conclusion? that the welfare of humanity is not a satisfactory obligation?
Society is a group of people with differing view points on everything. A Supreme Being is just that.
vhb: There is another thread that questions this, regarding blood RH factors; and may help (although off the wall). The RH negative question? Who rules the world? the Blue Bloods. My Grandfather was RH A negative. Lizard (blueblood). Obsessed with finding Gold/precious metals (a tried and true Knights Templar reincarnation). FreeMasons have forgotten their reason to be; why they are here. Perhaps their resonant time (as being influential) at all regarding anything of importance has passed (do not collect 200 dollars and pass GO as no longer relevant) because a higher presence or being is not acknowledged as supreme anymore.
Network dude: Just so you know, this is where you go off the rails and enter into fantasy land.
You have opinions of masonry, but you are not a mason, you are in Job's Daughters. Just as we don't know anything about what you have experienced, you don't know what we have experienced. And it's likely that your grandfather went through something completely different then we, as US Scottish Rite masons do. Everything is not universal. and blood type has nothing to do with being a mason. That is ignorant garbage talk.
originally posted by: KSigMason
I don't get why you think you have any authority to speak on Freemasonry.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
Laugh along; with those that have no idea "who is exactly in charge". If you have no idea you are asleep as are your people. I appreciate your joking but your humor does not add to any truth but to debunk. I am surprised you as call yourself a Mason would accept false truths so easily.
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
No one has defined that being (we live in faith as we deem it exists is all) and is above us to describe itself to us as CREATOR in sequence. You are a blusterer.