posted on Nov, 3 2007 @ 01:05 AM
Hello All,
I'm glad this thread has up. While I haven't yet read all the responses I did want to specifically discuss homosexuality and the Book of
Leviticus specifically.
Of the whole of the Old Testament , only two verses ( out of thousands) make any kind of reference to homosexual acts. Those are Leviticus 18:22 and
Leviticus 20:13. Both of these verses come from the Levitical holiness codes, which, if you think about it, are no longer kept by the Christian
Church. When was the last time you enjoyed a plate of shrimp scampy or wore a shirt made from a polyblend frabric? It is safe to say that were these
laws enforced, nearly every Christian would be either stoned to death or banished.
Fortunately, our scientific progress has made most, if not all of these laws irrelevant. Tim LaHaye stated in his book "The Act of Marriage" that,
although Levitical laws prohibit intercourse during menstruation, medical authorities do not view it as harmful, and, therefore, it should not be
viewed as sinful. He went on to expound , that because those laws were in place because it would be 3,500 years before the conveniences of showers
and baths, tampons, disinfectants and other sanitation had been invented. Having drawn this conclusion he nullifies those laws, and that's a good
thing. Unfortunately, in another book that he wrote on homosexuality he usues the very same Levitical laws to bolster his anti-homoseuxal argument.
Much of the holiness code is now irrelevant for us as moral law. Thus, having children, which was of exceptional importance to the early Hebrews, is
now made less relevant by overpopulation, just as the prohibition against eating pork and shellfish has been made irrelevant by refrigeration.
People often forget that the Bible, while never addressing the issue of homosexual love, does include several examples of same-sex love. David's love
for Jonathan was said to exceed his love for women. (2 Samuel 1:26) Ruth's relationship with Naomi is an example of a deep, bonding love, and
Ruth’s words of covenant to Naomi are often used in heterosexual wedding ceremonies. (Ruth 1:16-17) The Bible clearly values love between persons of
the same sex.
Most importantly, the Gospels of the New Testament imply in at least one place that Jesus' attitude toward homosexuals would not have been hostile.
It is found in the story of Jesus healing the Centurion's servant. (Matthew 8:5-13) The word used for the servant is “pais,” which in the
Greek culture referred to a younger lover of an older, more powerful or educated man. Clearly, the story demonstrates an unusually intense love, and
Jesus' response was wholly positive.
What I think is really sad is that the bible, on the whole, talks about the evils of hatered, greed etc. far more than homosexuality and yet
Christians choose to dwell on it far more than than the very sins it is known that he preached agianst. He was, in many ways, a changer of social
customs and mores. He elevated the position of women and in turn, they became some of his most ardant followers. He championed the cause of the poor
and the in turn, the rights of all people. Yet Christians, in His Name, denigrate the poor, downtroden, women and homosexual.
It is obvious that his most obvious message was LOVE. Christians would do well to remember that.
Cheers,
WS
[edit on 3/11/07 by WickedStar]