reply to post by docklands
People need to calm down and quit calling each other names. Be respectful, it’s the law of ATS!
I don't know why so many people are having such a problem dealing with this. People in different regions of the earth, have different
characteristics. I don't see what is so difficult to understand about this, jus think about it for a minute before you start screaming that I am a
member of the KKK. And on the article it self, how long and boring... stuffed with unimportant info.
Over the past few thousand years, the people of the world have had dramatically different histories, minus the last couple hundred years where Western
European conquest, spread thought the world, cross breading between the people, and pushing people out.
There are several distinct ethnic groups that we are going to 'generalize' (sorry if that’s going to offend some of you, if you got a problem with
that, consult the 1st amendment).
We will break the world’s population into a few categories, First we have the Western Europeans, then we have the Middle Easterners, and the People
of the Far East, and The peoples of Africa, and the People of the Americas. We will now break down each of the ethnicities, and the lifestyles each
had for the last few thousand years.
First we will start with the Western Europeans (and the people north of the Sahara), over the last few thousand years the peoples of western Europe
organized into City-states, that were battling with each other, and were involved in agricultural, and farming, and domestication of animals. The rise
of democracies, and vast wars between the city states, forced the competing societies to create better technology to kill each other with, this
'invent or die' mentality of the Western Europeans was a catalyst for scientific discovery, the desire to make better weapons with stronger metal
changed the way people live. Also, with the availability of a farming society, an excess of food was available, having extra food, the people were
able to have government, where people would just figure out how to run things, and not worry about collecting food. This excess of food, thus further
allowed more people to specialize in other trades, such as a Blacksmith, or a philosopher. This specialization allowed the overall level of the
societies to advance further. The invention (although it was adapted from the middle eastern societies) of the written word, allowed the societies to
keep track of things, such as growing seasons, and started to be able to keep a written history. This also was advantage in war; as being able to
write commands to pass along was far better then the written word. All these things contributed to a society that was keen on learning, and over the
years, people became 'intelligent', by not having to worry about the daily strain of finding a meal, these people were able to specialize and
learn.
Next we will observe the societies in the Middle East (and Egypt). Out of the Middle East was the home of the great discovery of agricultural farming,
and the written word, and well as the early domestication of large mammals. This great land mass was very fertile, and thus was able to provide much
food, and led to many great empires, including some of the largest ever seen on the world (the Ottoman empire). The armies that came out of the Middle
East were some of the largest the world has ever seen in the ancient world. As time progressed, the technology of the Middle Eastern societies did not
advance as fast as their neighbors to the west, but the societies had a rich warrior tradition.
Now we will examine the societies of eastern Asia (including the island in the south pacific). The people of eastern Asia, like the Europeans, had
gotten the techniques of farming from the middle east, and while the people of eastern Asia did not domesticate any more animals, they had domesticate
animals (dogs, pigs, chickens, ect) from the middle east. Now this is where I have some lacking knowledge, I do not know a good amount of the military
history of this region, but these people were perhaps the first sea faring people on earth. Moving south thru the Polynesian islands, settling in
present day Australia and New Zealand. These people were able to farm, and had domesticate animals, however, these people in the far south pacific had
a varying range of climate, some societies did not develop 'advanced' societies with a government, and some never went further then hunter gather
societies.
Now we will look at the societies of Sub-Sahara Africa. There are no records of farming arising in the southern Africa, nor were any animals
domesticated. This combination of these two led to a society that A. could not make a large food supply, not being able to store and have a
replenishable food source meant that the societies could not have dedicated politicians, or people that would philosophize. Since these people could
not farm, and had no domesticated animals to eat, they were stuck in a hunter gathering society, and this Hunter gathering society was the society of
almost all of southern Africa. Thus, the people spent 1000's of years chasing and hunting down game, for food. Why do you think that some guy from
Kenya, or the Sudan always win the marathons...
And, the people of the Native Americas (presumably crossed into the Americans from Asia some 20K-50K years ago). These societies were very diverse,
ranging from hunter gathers, to heavenly agricultural societies, these people however, had no large domesticated animals that would have been a
sustainable food source. (And not having a large domesticated animal, this led to these societies to never invent the wheel, since there was no reason
to). The farming societies that arose become very large, and were able to feed many people, and were able to create very diverse people within a
society. The technology of these societies did not advance very far (in terms of weaponry). This is no better illustrated then when the Spanish
conquered the Americas, there are battles where a few hundred Spaniards killed 10 of thousands of Indians. The wooden and stone weapons of the Native
Americans could not match the Steel weaponry of the Western Europeans.
So in Review:
Western Europeans = A society that was based on learning, and technology advances
Eastern Asia = A societies that had a culture of learning, and agriculture
Middle Eastern = A warrior society, with the invention of written word, agriculture, and domestication of animals
Native Americans = Large agricultural society, with low advance in War technology
Sub-Saharan African = A hunter Gather society
Sorry for the long winded post, and for the many things that I left out that would help explain more, I hope that you take the time to read this, and
see the historical differences in the societies, and what thousands of years of a type of society can do.
But, (yes there is always a but) people can learn, and if people from an African society were transplanted into a Western European society, over the
course of some generations, the people can become 'intergraded' into the society, and 'fit right in'
(And just a side not, at my college I would say that 98% of the people at the collage are of 2 types of ancestor, either of Western European Ancestry,
or Eastern Asian Ancestry.) And I know exactly one person, who came straight from Africa, and she speaks with a heavy British accent, and her family
has been educated with Western European studies for several hundred years in Africa.
Please take the time to read, this is probably the most involved post I have ever made here, and any input would be appreciated, as well as additional
info on the characteristics of the societies that I could not fit in under the character limit.