It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"The Black Man, Is Crazy!"

page: 3
18
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 11:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by JohnnyCanuck
In fairness, though, that's because negro is Spanish for black, right? The word denigrate, for example, is not derived from 'the n-word', rather they come from the common root. However, that word in particular would certainly seem to bolster SatansQue's original argument, wouldn't it?


No, you're missing the point.

I'll give you a couple of examples to show you what I meant. "Nigger toes" was a name for brazilnuts, I believe, but if not that then another nut. There are actually many places around the country that still have "'n-word'" in their names, like "'n-word' head."

And no, it doesn't bolster his argument. As I said, English makes it a point to hail white and rail black. Why do you think that you can call someone "negrito/a" in Latin countries and it's not an insult? English set itself up so that it is an insult.

Pot calling the kettle black - common phrase in which the insult, "black," is often overlooked.

White as the driven snow - common phrase where white is clearly hailed as pure and innocent.

Blackball - negative phrase where someone is banned from something

White lie - positive phrase because a "white" lie is not a bad lie. A deeper look into this phrase will show that "white" is a reference to the people, not the color. Essentially, when a white person lies, it's not that bad.



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 12:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by SatansQue
But more importantly, this "Black" thing is only 44 years old. It's not like "Black" people decided to call themselves black, and then all the white people on the planet changed the meaning of the word in all the dictionaries to represent something that is evil, just to screw black people.


Like I said, you don't get it. The emphasis on skin color variation did NOT start with the "coloreds," as you say. It started with white people from Europe 500 years ago.



So what you're saying, is these words have had negative, racist connotations for as long as the "White man" has been writting books, but somehow, colored folks decided that they should embrace, perhaps the most negative words in human - English, world history and create a whole culture behind it?


Oh, please.


I told you you have no clue. I didn't say the "white man," I said ENGLISH. I guess there's no other whites on the planet, then.
And it's more about having good self-esteem than being picky over a word. The "black" thing was more about realizing that no matter what whites may say, you're still a man/woman with high value and potential.

And then you go on and talk about world history.:shk: Like I said, you have no idea. Aristotle himself said that pale skin and blue eyes were the mark of a coward. What happened to your precious "white" then? Keep in mind, this was a European saying this.

The point is that there's more than one way of looking at something. Just because you don't understand the duality in English doesn't mean that calling yourself black makes you evil.




And from a spiritual standpoint, before there were human beings - english dictionaries, the earth, the stars, the universe, what do you think there was, but the void? The black, the darkness, the nothing. Devoid of Light. I'm not making this up. So calling yourself Black, on a spiritual level, is identifying with the void - a time before anything existed. Nothingness.


And now you use semantics to justify your point. By your logic here, white equals light, right? So, calling yourself White, on a spiritual level, is identifying with the light, which brought meaning to nothingness. So, it was only natural to colonize those who were not of the "light."

So, as you say about black, I now say that calling yourself White infers that you are superior and most important. Hey, you started this.



I've been to Dallas Fortworth, several times... The rednecks got it, but the "Black" man, till this day calls me a sell-out.


Oooh, 1 city (well, twin cities) in Texas, you've seen it all.
Next time you head to the Tex, let me know, so I can recommend cities for you to stop by in.



Before we were "Black" one of the strongest family - community structures in America were the colored families...Because we were excited for the accomplishments of all colored people.


Still stuck in the 400 year snapshot of black history, I see. Any idea where that strong family came from?




I lived through some of the history you've read about.


Please.
I'm talking about the glory days of black history. Do look outside of America for a glimpse of that.



My daughter is a hip-hop producer. She knows how I feel. And I know who supports it.


And yet you still rant about how destructive it is to the black community. Tell you what: why don't you go to Best Buy/Walmart/Target/the mall, and tell all those white kids how much hip hop is poisoning their community.




It's patently obvious they don't.


Like I said, self-hater. Just because YOU don't understand the difference between reality and fantasy doesn't mean I share your sentiments. You should look into skin bleaching; I hear it's a billion-dollar industry.



Being "Black" IS the stereotype. IT defines you.


Lol, ok. Then again, you just proved what I said about having wealth, social status, etc. You will STILL be a stereotype, as you just said. Until you get those skin whiteners, huh?




By definition, it is crazy to call yourself "Black "


Link, please.
The opinion of someone who hates themself because of his skin pigmentation is FAR from this definition.

But really, why DO you hate yourself so much? Your self-hatred is CLEARLY why you project hate onto the black American community as well. With all the stereotypes you've laid out, you'd make a fine racist. Then again, you're not "black," so I guess you ARE racist, then?


[edit on 23-6-2007 by truthseeka]



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 01:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by truthseeka
Like I said, you don't get it. The emphasis on skin color variation did NOT start with the "coloreds," as you say. It started with white people from Europe 500 years ago.


Truthseeka, it is a fact that colored people collectively, didn't begin calling themselves black until the early 30s, culminating in 60s. This is just a fact. Sorry if facts don't fit into your world view.


Originally posted by truthseeka
I told you you have no clue. I didn't say the "white man," I said ENGLISH. I guess there's no other whites on the planet, then.


Show me, in any language of your chosing, a definition of the word black, that doesn't have a negative connotation. Can you please do this for me?


Originally posted by truthseeka
And it's more about having good self-esteem than being picky over a word.


Being picky over a word? Words have meanings my friend. And if the actions of people who defined themselves as black, match the definition of the word, IN ANY LANGUAGE, then I'm not just being picky.


Originally posted by truthseeka
The "black" thing was more about realizing that no matter what whites may say, you're still a man/woman with high value and potential.


"no matter what whites may say". So the "white man" is the motivation, the springboard. The "white man's" attitude is what drove people of color to define themselves as that, which the "white man" meant as an insult.


Originally posted by truthseeka
And then you go on and talk about world history.:shk: Like I said, you have no idea. Aristotle himself said that pale skin and blue eyes were the mark of a coward. What happened to your precious "white" then? Keep in mind, this was a European saying this.


I really don't know where you got the idea that I was chosing white over black? You're obsessed with "white".


Originally posted by truthseeka
And now you use semantics to justify your point. By your logic here, white equals light, right?"


That's your logic, not mine. It's your inferiority complex showing it's true colors.


Semantics: \si-'mant-iks\ n 1 : the study of meanings: a. the historical and psycological study, and the classification of changes in the signification of words or forms viewed as factors in linguistic development.


Actually truthseeka, the current useage of the word "Black" by "Blacks" IS semantics by definition, because it is both a historical, and psycological change of the original meaning of the word. Black had nothing to do with people, because the word described a reality before anything existed.


Originally posted by truthseeka
So, calling yourself White, on a spiritual level, is identifying with the light, which brought meaning to nothingness.


Again, this is all you.

But on a spiritual level - the body, regardless of race, or color is actually a hinderence to identifying with the light. The Light of God, resides in us all. Now just because on a physical level people want to place themselves higher, or believe that it makes them more endearing to the Source of Light, by being "White" doesn't make it so.


Originally posted by truthseeka
So, as you say about black, I now say that calling yourself White infers that you are superior and most important. Hey, you started this.


Of course you can say anything you want. But this whole topic has nothing to do with comparisons between white and black. I can't help you with your obvious, psycological inferiority complex to "Whites".


Originally posted by truthseeka
Oooh, 1 city (well, twin cities) in Texas, you've seen it all.
Next time you head to the Tex, let me know, so I can recommend cities for you to stop by in.


Actually, it's about 3 - 4 cities. DFW is the one I had the best story from, unless you want to hear about the time I won 2nd place at a redneck bar in the birthplace of Nolan Ryan - Refugio, Texas.


Originally posted by truthseeka
Please.
I'm talking about the glory days of black history. Do look outside of America for a glimpse of that.


Glory days? You mean the days you never lived, but read about? Of course I have no idea what you're talking about. But if your reference is to Africa, people were called themselves, Nigerian, Congolese, Sinagalese, not Black. The only people who called them black, were outsiders who meant it as an insult. The only race of people in the history of humankind to call themselves black, are the american Negroes.


Originally posted by satansque
My daughter is a hip-hop producer. She knows how I feel. And I know who supports it.



Originally posted by truthseeka
And yet you still rant about how destructive it is to the black community.


Because I'm not a hypocrite.


Originally posted by truthseeka
Tell you what: why don't you go to Best Buy/Walmart/Target/the mall, and tell all those white kids how much hip hop is poisoning their community.


It's poisoning their communities terribly. But you know, they can play at being "Black" and ignorant, and then move on.


Originally posted by truthseeka
Like I said, self-hater. Just because YOU don't understand the difference between reality and fantasy doesn't mean I share your sentiments. You should look into skin bleaching; I hear it's a billion-dollar industry.


Amazing!


Originally posted by satanque
By definition, it is crazy to call yourself "Black "

Link, please.


Get a dictionary - in any language. Read the definition, and justify.


Originally posted by truthseeka
With all the stereotypes you've laid out, you'd make a fine racist. Then again, you're not "black," so I guess you ARE racist, then?


Simply... amazing!

Arthur Schopenhauer aptly stated:
“All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.”

You have 2 more steps truthseeka. That is, if you're really a truth seeker.


[edit on 23-6-2007 by SatansQue]



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 03:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by SatansQue
Truthseeka, it is a fact that colored people collectively, didn't begin calling themselves black until the early 30s, culminating in 60s. This is just a fact. Sorry if facts don't fit into your world view.


It's really like explaining sexual selection to a mole cricket. The first group of people who made a big deal about melanin content was Europeans. They got this mentality from the Portugese and Spanish, who held a grudge against black people because of the Moorish conquest.

Black Americans then took the label centuries later, but what do you expect when the only culture you have a significant base for is the dominant culture?



Show me, in any language of your chosing, a definition of the word black, that doesn't have a negative connotation. Can you please do this for me?


Pay attention. I already mentioned "negrito/a" in Latin countries.


Being picky over a word? Words have meanings my friend. And if the actions of people who defined themselves as black, match the definition of the word, IN ANY LANGUAGE, then I'm not just being picky.


You spew a stereotype once again. What's with the self-loathing?


"no matter what whites may say". So the "white man" is the motivation, the springboard. The "white man's" attitude is what drove people of color to define themselves as that, which the "white man" meant as an insult.


I'm not surprised you can't understand this. BTW, when blacks and whites first met, blacks were revered. Understandably so, as they laid the foundation for Western civilization. Of course, all this is lost on you, undoubtedly.


I really don't know where you got the idea that I was chosing white over black? You're obsessed with "white".


I have a response for this for another post.


Actually truthseeka, the current useage of the word "Black" by "Blacks" IS semantics by definition, because it is both a historical, and psycological change of the original meaning of the word. Black had nothing to do with people, because the word described a reality before anything existed.


Man, you are so clueless. Your insistence that "black" is only an insult shows your ignorance as well as your self-hate. Centuries ago, Arabs called Africans black. It was no insult, it was merely a descriptive term. In fact, an Arab scholar wrote a book that translated as "The Glory of the Black Man over the White Man."

You should really learn something before you expand your self-hate to black people.



Again, this is all you.

But on a spiritual level - the body, regardless of race, or color is actually a hinderence to identifying with the light. The Light of God, resides in us all. Now just because on a physical level people want to place themselves higher, or believe that it makes them more endearing to the Source of Light, by being "White" doesn't make it so.


What? I used the same logic you did when you referenced your Christian mythology. Therefore, it makes as much sense as your reference, which is none. That OBVIOUSLY went way over your head.




Of course you can say anything you want. But this whole topic has nothing to do with comparisons between white and black. I can't help you with your obvious, psycological inferiority complex to "Whites".


Once again, you can do it but I can't. You're just making this up as you go.


Originally posted by truthseeka
Glory days? You mean the days you never lived, but read about? Of course I have no idea what you're talking about. But if your reference is to Africa, people were called themselves, Nigerian, Congolese, Sinagalese, not Black. The only people who called them black, were outsiders who meant it as an insult. The only race of people in the history of humankind to call themselves black, are the american Negroes.


You REALLY need to learn something. I've already told you that Arabs called Africans black as a descriptor, but you need me to hold your hand a bit longer, I see.

The Greeks and Romans called Africans black, as it was customary to call someone something that described them. If you were big, it was a size reference. For Africans, it was a skin color reference. Clitus Niger, African foster brother of Alexander the Great (another example of labeling), is a prime example.

Hate to break it to you (ok, I actually enjoy it), but your delusions conflict remarkably with reality.


It's poisoning their communities terribly. But you know, they can play at being "Black" and ignorant, and then move on.


OOOOOOH! So, white kids understand the difference between life and art, but black kids don't? And I'M the one who feels whites are superior to blacks?



Get a dictionary - in any language. Read the definition, and justify.


We're talking about REALITY, not Satansque's world. REALITY shows no definition of crazy as "calling yourself black."



Simply... amazing!


You started out saying that black people are crazy, you then said that blacks can't tell the difference between life and art, and then you said that whites can tell the difference between life and art. Shoe fits you nicely.



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 03:21 PM
link   
All of these are your words.


But the ugly came out, as it often does when "Black" youths gather in groups.

Funny thing about "Black" people, man they sure do hate each other.

Add to this, the fact that 95-97% of all the Black people murdered in America, are murdered by "Blacks" and everything begins to make perfect sense as to why "Black" people are so damn crazy - because they are "Black".

If 20 or more black youths gather here, for any reason, somebody is going to get stabbed or shot.

Black culture looks more and more like a contruct designed to mimick white racist ideology, as it pertains to the hatred of Blacks.

Where young "Black" children will walk down the street eating or drinking whatever, and carelessly drop the containers on the street, without so much as a thought in their brains.


Straight from your keyboard. Tsk tsk tsk, straight from your keyboard.:shk:



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 06:42 PM
link   
truthseeka,

I understand where you are coming from, and I'm as glad to read your posts, as I'm glad SQ brought up this thread...you bring up a lot of points, and also give others a lot of chances to say even more, through your points...

But, honestly, you're getting personal in your rebuttals, which to the objective reader makes you seem a little, uh...defensive, especially when valid points have been brought up which you haven't adressed. Not one. Meaning, acknowledging a certain situation in the first place...the reasons for this situation are debatable, but you don't even acknowledge the situation - being that "Black" America is not in a very healthy state...or their image, still.

We have had the chance to prove ourselves, and what are we doing, actually? What kind of an image have we built for ourselves? Have you ever lived outside the States, and soaked up others opinions on black people, based on their own portrayals of themselves? This is not just an 'American' issue but a global one. Everyone looks to the States for the definition of a 'black' person, and the black race. It's the only place on this planet where 'blacks' are free to show who they are - they even have their own universities, just for their race! You all are so busy cataloguing the negatives, that you can't see the positives - that you are free. But like good slaves, I guess you all can't handle freedom too well.

And guess what other people in other countries see, considering most don't have access to Oprah, but they do have MTV. There are still many people on this planet who have never seen colored people in person. Many.
When I grew up in Germany, I was the only colored person in my village, in my school, within my circle of friends, in the world, as far as I could tell, besides my Mom.

I was the only 'black' person some people saw all their lives. Imagine that. No, I am not an Army brat, no military connections whatsoever. The racism some americans complain about, I laugh at. This generation has no idea, what true racism is. None. America is way too educated to be racist. Willfully ignorant, yes, no doubt. I find "Blacks" to be more willfully and actively ignorant, than others they complain about. Especially against their own.

'Black' people nowadays don't get that more people have a problem with their perceived and portrayed MENTALITY than with actual skin colour. Most whites I know could care less in the end, just like anybody else. But even many colored, like me, are disappointed in the endless stream of drama, and garbage. Especially when this is packaged as the so-called black culture. That is not my culture.

Of course you never hear about the positives, they are taken for granted, and you only hear about the negatives..that is true. And considering, the black community tends to villify everyone who has 'made it' as selling out on the way, the ones who have 'made it' tend to be pretty quiet, if they don't have to be in the public eye. Those in the public eye that have made it, better not forget their 'roots', and never ever, in one interview, forget to show that through a little slip in the language once in awhile.

As to the actual calling of ' black'...it's pretty obvious that language influences mentality and vice versa. If you speak a language that has negative connotations for a certain word, anything with that word is also perceived as negative. so if you call yourself something negative constantly, joke or not, sooner or later you reap the results.
Your subconscious doesn't joke, and doesn't understand sarcasm...do the following. Think of all these words that are just adjectives...fat, lazy, slobby - they have no meaning, besides the meaning we assign to them. They are just adjectives. They just describe something. Fat is usually negative if associated with people, but elsewhere, it is neutral, like "a fat rope". It can be positive : a fat and juicy pear, a fat leg of mutton, etc.

Do you understand?



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 06:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by truthseeka

Originally posted by SatansQue
I really don't know where you got the idea that I was chosing white over black? You're obsessed with "white".


I have a response for this for another post.


And in your response, you don't mention "white" at all. You take several of SQ's quotes where he talks about "black", but he never mentions or insinuates that he chooses white over black.

Truthseeka, you carry an inherent assumption that "white" is somehow the opposition of "black" when talking about race. Caucasian is no more the opposite of African American than green is the opposite of blue or wind is the opposite of rain or Arab is the opposite of Swedish. Only in the mind of someone who pits the two races against each other are they opposites.

Those of us who see them standing alone don't see them as opposites or at war with each other.


Originally posted by SatansQue
So the "white man" is the motivation, the springboard. The "white man's" attitude is what drove people of color to define themselves as that, which the "white man" meant as an insult.


Excellent! If a person can only define themselves in relation to another kind of person; in reaction or response to another person's views, they don't stand alone as themselves. They will always be defined as compared to something else.


Originally posted by SatansQue
But this whole topic has nothing to do with comparisons between white and black.


Some people can't get this concept. I think it's time people of color stop using tan people as a springboard to define themselves. Call yourself "black" if you like, but thinking it's the opposite of white (in racial terms) is a mistake.


Originally posted by truthseeka
Like I said, self-hater. Just because YOU don't understand the difference between reality and fantasy doesn't mean I share your sentiments. You should look into skin bleaching; I hear it's a billion-dollar industry.


Ahhh... and so we stoop to the lowest common denominator. :shk:


Originally posted by truthseeka
Then again, you're not "black," so I guess you ARE racist, then?


Edit to Add: I realize I misinterpreted this statement of truthseeka's, so I am removing my response to it.


I really hate to see such a good discussion disintegrate like this. I hope we can haul it back out of the name-calling, angry gutter.

[edit on 23-6-2007 by Benevolent Heretic]



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 07:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Soraia
But, honestly, you're getting personal in your rebuttals, which to the objective reader makes you seem a little, uh...defensive, especially when valid points have been brought up which you haven't adressed. Not one. Meaning, acknowledging a certain situation in the first place...the reasons for this situation are debatable, but you don't even acknowledge the situation - being that "Black" America is not in a very healthy state...or their image, still.


Why shouldn't I be defensive? This...guy comes here and says that black men are crazy, and if you identify yourself as black you're nothing. Members of my fam, my black friends, and I are on some positive stuff in our lives, but this...guy just calls us all evil because of how we identify ourselves.

And your last point is flat out wrong. Only a fool would say nothing's wrong with Black America, but only a fool would also say that the problems stem from the term "black."



We have had the chance to prove ourselves, and what are we doing, actually? What kind of an image have we built for ourselves? Have you ever lived outside the States, and soaked up others opinions on black people, based on their own portrayals of themselves? This is not just an 'American' issue but a global one. Everyone looks to the States for the definition of a 'black' person, and the black race. It's the only place on this planet where 'blacks' are free to show who they are - they even have their own universities, just for their race! You all are so busy cataloguing the negatives, that you can't see the positives - that you are free. But like good slaves, I guess you all can't handle freedom too well.


What are you talking about? Prove ourselves to who? You also apparently don't know that the current view of black people pales in comparison to the view of antiquity. But, you prefer the view of the last 500 years...to each their own, I guess.

And what's with the "good slaves" stuff? The problem with you and many other black people not from America is that you're jealous of us black Americans. Even as you talk about the negative black images from stuff like hip hop, you're jealous of all the money the rappers have. Hell, you're even jealous of what black Americans in the middle class have.

And you talk about worldwide perception. Who cares? If you take your views on people from the media, too bad for you. The media is heavily biased in many aspects. The one relevant to this context is how you'll see a black American as a criminal or an athlete WAY before you'll see us as a businessman or a scientist. Those of us who are successful in areas like education and business are ignored by the media. This is so viewers like you can pigeonhole black Americans on this type of level in with gangstas and criminals; keep an eye on your TV, you'll get PLENTY of these depictions.




'Black' people nowadays don't get that more people have a problem with their perceived and portrayed MENTALITY than with actual skin colour. Most whites I know could care less in the end, just like anybody else. But even many colored, like me, are disappointed in the endless stream of drama, and garbage. Especially when this is packaged as the so-called black culture. That is not my culture.


Just keep lumping us all in with poor people from the hood. It really helps your case.



Of course you never hear about the positives, they are taken for granted, and you only hear about the negatives..that is true. And considering, the black community tends to villify everyone who has 'made it' as selling out on the way, the ones who have 'made it' tend to be pretty quiet, if they don't have to be in the public eye. Those in the public eye that have made it, better not forget their 'roots', and never ever, in one interview, forget to show that through a little slip in the language once in awhile.


I've seen this garbage enough times to come to expect it. EVERYONE from the hood encouraged me to further my education. Same with other people going places. They didn't tell us to stay in the streets because that's where we belong. They told us to shoot for the top, they told us to make it. You shouldn't talk about things you know little about in such an absolute way.

The people who are criticized as sellouts actually ARE sellouts. Wow, what a concept.
If this were actually true, every single black person that "made it" would be hated by the black community. As this is clearly not the case, this is yet another example of you running your mouth about that which you don't know much about.



As to the actual calling of ' black'...it's pretty obvious that language influences mentality and vice versa...Do you understand?


So...

A black person who commits a crime is constantly thinking "oh, I'm SOOO black and evil" while they do it? What do non-blacks think as they commit a crime?
Better yet, the average black person is thinking "yeah, I'm SO black, black like evil, I'm black and I'm bad, I'm black and I'm SO evil."

Get OUTTA here with that nonsense. Seriously, you and Satan's arguments about black make absolutely NO sense. By this logic, white people will commit no crimes, be benevolent towards all, etc., because they call themselves white. Because white has so many good connotations, if you call yourself white, you will be pure and innocent, never to do a foul deed.

And y'all actually believe this stuff...tell you what, why don't you and Satan let me know if what I said about the white label is just as valid as what y'all say about the black label.



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 07:58 PM
link   
truthseeka,

I posted in my earlier posts that I had the good fortune to grow up on both continents, so I do know what I'm talking about. I am able to make comparisons.

I had the luck to come from a very affluent background, which I have managed to maintain, so there is no jealousy here, lol.

Many colored I have met from other countries weren't jealous either, if anything, they were worried about the direction of development.

You have obviously missed my point about people looking towards America, whether you like it or not, for the image of free black people.

The villifying I have seen with my own eyes happen to others, and experienced myself. Maybe you're just not high up enough yet - and maybe you are still within your native community. Move away, and meet people who know nothing of your struggles. And don't tell them about your struggles, just enjoy your success - lol. And give no signs, that you are a part of the community - dress differently, think differently, speak differently.

So in a nutshell, all you have to say is that I and other non-Americans are jealous of rich rappers, and that is why we criticize? I guess in your mind only american rappers are rich, lol, and everyone wants a 'bling' lifestyle?

I dunno, I think I pulled something completely different from what SQ was saying. But then again, I am trying to listen to everyone...

Uhm..as to the media...yes definitely, I agree. But then again, growing up, I didn't see any shows from Asia, or so. It's not just black people...

But against racism there were a lot of shows - to this day actually, dealing with Germany's history and their struggle to come to grips with it. They are doing everything NOT to forget. I can't say their programming was racist. Some of the travel shows were, subtly, but not many, and not all. Those that were were few and far between, as far as I could tell.

Actually, growing up in late 80's-90's Germany, I was less fully aware of my race as in North America, to be honest. In Germany I just was, and I happened to be black. Here, I am a Black Woman. Actually, I should have that put beneath my Avatar, because it is what defines me here, and which community I belong to, lol. Proud to be Black.

My views are not from 500 years ago, they are from my current observations and experiences. If I had experienced other things, I would have had other things to say.

And as to the view of black people in antiquity, that is a whole other thread, in which you probably wouldn't agree with me either.


[edit on 23-6-2007 by Soraia]

[edit on 23-6-2007 by Soraia]



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 09:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Soraia
I had the luck to come from a very affluent background, which I have managed to maintain, so there is no jealousy here, lol.


I see. The hood is FULL of affluent people, I forgot about that.



The villifying I have seen with my own eyes happen to others, and experienced myself. Maybe you're just not high up enough yet - and maybe you are still within your native community. Move away, and meet people who know nothing of your struggles. And don't tell them about your struggles, just enjoy your success - lol. And give no signs, that you are a part of the community - dress differently, think differently, speak differently.


When I travel, I don't think about this kind of stuff. And the next time I leave the country, I STILL won't be worried about representing black America.

The US's image as a whole has now been ruined. I think numerous people worldwide hate Americans in general, and are not focused on black Americans.



So in a nutshell, all you have to say is that I and other non-Americans are jealous of rich rappers, and that is why we criticize? I guess in your mind only american rappers are rich, lol, and everyone wants a 'bling' lifestyle?


I notice you omitted the other part of my post. Not surprised, though.



Uhm..as to the media...yes definitely, I agree. But then again, growing up, I didn't see any shows from Asia, or so. It's not just black people...


So Asians didn't exist in your world view, which you clearly get from the boob tube? I see.

The rest of your post didn't make sense, so no replies to that. But, I AM still waiting for your answer to my question about "white."



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 09:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by truthseeka

Originally posted by Soraia
I had the luck to come from a very affluent background, which I have managed to maintain, so there is no jealousy here, lol.


I see. The hood is FULL of affluent people, I forgot about that.


Why do you assume that I lie? Because I am fluent in english?


truthseeka

Soraia
The villifying I have seen with my own eyes happen to others, and experienced myself. Maybe you're just not high up enough yet - and maybe you are still within your native community. Move away, and meet people who know nothing of your struggles. And don't tell them about your struggles, just enjoy your success - lol. And give no signs, that you are a part of the community - dress differently, think differently, speak differently.



When I travel, I don't think about this kind of stuff. And the next time I leave the country, I STILL won't be worried about representing black America.


I didn't say travel, I said move. And you do think about it, otherwise you wouldn't be on here defending it.


truthseeka
The US's image as a whole has now been ruined. I think numerous people worldwide hate Americans in general, and are not focused on black Americans.


Who said they 'hated' Black Americans? Or that it ever was a major topic? I was talking about the perceived image through a certain portrayal. Or is this you assuming, because of what you feel?


truthseeka

Soraia
So in a nutshell, all you have to say is that I and other non-Americans are jealous of rich rappers, and that is why we criticize? I guess in your mind only american rappers are rich, lol, and everyone wants a 'bling' lifestyle?


I notice you omitted the other part of my post. Not surprised, though.


What other part of your post? The rest of your put-down?


truthseeka

Soraia
Uhm..as to the media...yes definitely, I agree. But then again, growing up, I didn't see any shows from Asia, or so. It's not just black people...


So Asians didn't exist in your world view, which you clearly get from the boob tube? I see.


Huh?????? You seem to be against a wall to be pulling this. Please re-read what you posted about media.


truthseeka
The rest of your post didn't make sense, so no replies to that. But, I AM still waiting for your answer to my question about "white."


What part did you choose not to understand? What you have been putting down here is exactly what I mean when I talk about willful ignorance...


As to "white", I already stated that white people have no issues with themselves, not to the extent that Black Americans do. They haven't conditioned themselves to that level of self-hatred. I guess you missed that part too..I haven't seen them on a grand-scale call themselves or their women in any derogatory way so that even people who don't even speak the language know what a 'ho' and a 'bitch' is...and that somehow it doesn't apply to White, Asian, Native American, Amazon Indian or even Aborigine women.



posted on Jun, 23 2007 @ 11:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Soraia
Why do you assume that I lie? Because I am fluent in english?


I have no idea what this means.



I didn't say travel, I said move. And you do think about it, otherwise you wouldn't be on here defending it.


Funny you're fluent in English, yet you apparently misread what I posted. I said while traveling. People tend not to care about life's problems while on vacation.


Who said they 'hated' Black Americans? Or that it ever was a major topic? I was talking about the perceived image through a certain portrayal. Or is this you assuming, because of what you feel?


"Is this what you feel?" Ha ha ha, I won't pay you to be my shrink, but you can play at it all you want. If that's what you feel like doing.
Seriously, though, that was funny.



Huh?????? You seem to be against a wall to be pulling this. Please re-read what you posted about media.


Was it not you who said people outside the US form their world views on black people from TV? Was it not you who said many people haven't seen a black person in real life?

My point was if you get your views of black people from TV, you get your view of Asians from TV as well. So, if you saw no shows, you had no worldview past something you read about.


truthseeka
What part did you choose not to understand? What you have been putting down here is exactly what I mean when I talk about willful ignorance...


I didn't choose to misunderstand you. Stop rambling on a different tangent from what you're trying to say, and I might understand.



As to "white", I already stated that white people have no issues with themselves, not to the extent that Black Americans do.


Quite an absolute statement with no evidence to back it up.


They haven't conditioned themselves to that level of self-hatred. I guess you missed that part too..


Tell me more, as you know so much about America.
You have no idea what you're talking about. The same people that destroyed the black family is in the process of destroying the white family in America. But, I'm sure you know all that already, hmmm?




I haven't seen them on a grand-scale call themselves or their women in any derogatory way so that even people who don't even speak the language know what a 'ho' and a 'bitch' is...and that somehow it doesn't apply to White, Asian, Native American, Amazon Indian or even Aborigine women.


Once again, you know it all. You KNOW that "bitch" or 'ho" is a term EXCLUSIVELY for black women.

I mean, what can I tell you? Nothing. You have all the knowledge...what else can I say?



posted on Jun, 24 2007 @ 12:29 AM
link   
SatansQue,

I now realize that I've been taking you too seriously. What else can you expect when you come across gems like this:


originally posted by SatansQue

Folks, you have to know that every single day, I say to myself, "Dude, why are you dressed up like Satan, and calling yourself Satansque?"

Because for Ages saints, prophets, gurus, Holy men and women have said it's all about the love of God, and of each other, and for some reason humankind insists on doing it another way.

I figure if folks won't listen to them, maybe they'll listen to a guy dressed as the devil.


And then this:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Ah, that's good stuff. Thanks.



posted on Jun, 24 2007 @ 12:59 AM
link   
I believe that ignorance is ignorance, regardless of color. I believe that it has much more to do with education. You also see this type of violence in areas that tend to house low income low education families. Regardless of color. Lets educate and eradicate ignorance!



posted on Jun, 24 2007 @ 02:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by truthseeka
The first group of people who made a big deal about melanin content was Europeans. They got this mentality from the Portugese and Spanish, who held a grudge against black people because of the Moorish conquest.


This discussion has nothing to do with who, what, where, when or how other races of people refer to people of color. It's about how people of color define themselves. Using your example, the Moorish people did not call themselves black, they referred to themselves as Moors.

Truthseeka, really, I think you actually believe that you understand the intent of this conversation - you don't. The reason why, is because you think words, and their intent, are relative. You can't imagine the power words have to transform - that some words are not just words, but the description of a reality. The word black, is such a word. It describes a reality that existed long before humanity existed. And those who would call themselves "Black" just don't get it. Period the end!

Perfect example: back in the early 90s, the word "Stupid" was for black people in the hood, a word that meant something was fabulous. A great looking, tricked out car was called stupid. A really hot musical group was called stupid. You get my point. What if the same Black people had decided to co-op the word stupid, saying, "I am Black, proud and stupid?"

Point is, only a stupid person would think the meaning of the word stupid could be changed to mean something positive.

The word black is the same. It is not - listen to this, it is not a color. It is the absense of color. If you walk into a pitch black room, you will see absolutely nothing. Do you understand this? The room may have Rembrants hanging on every wall, but you will never see them, unless you turn the light on. This is not my opinion.

Also, language and culture are inseperable. If you speak the language of this society, which is american english, embedded into every word you use to discribe anything, is the history, and culture of this land. Every day you interact with others who speak the same language, but it's not until you travel to a foreign land that you find out some of the words you use, will have no equivalent to folks from... pick a country.

But there's never been a country called Black. So saying, "I am black" is not the same as saying, for instance, "I am Italian" or "I am Irish". Because Italians can trace their roots back to Itally, and the same can be said for the Irish.


Originally posted by satansque
If the actions of people who defined themselves as black, match the definition of the word, IN ANY LANGUAGE, then I'm not just being picky.



Originally posted by truthseeka
You spew a stereotype once again. What's with the self-loathing?



Black, an adjective: Thoroughly sinister or evil, wicked, indicative of condemnation or discredit, sad, gloomy, or calamitous. Marked by the occurrence of disaster. And the money shot: characterized by the absence of light.


Not self loathing, just the truth. The actions of the people involved in the Juneteenth fiascos, who killed a man, beat a man, etc., were in perfect harmony with the above definition.

I need to make a correction on the number of black people murdered by black people. The FBI began keeping stats in 1976, not 1975, and the total number was 139,360, not 150,000.

With that said, would it be self-loathing to say the murderers of those 139,360 black people, were acting in harmony with the above definition?

If in 1976, the numbers of Black people murdered by blacks, had reached a total of 5,630, it would be easy for a mathmatician, based on the available stats, to calculate estimates of the previous ten years from 1966 to 1975. The point is, this is the time frame in which colored people began calling themselves black, and it corrolates directly to the rise in murders, and some pretty astronomical agravated assault figures. Not to mention the fact that most, if not all of the crack and heroine sold in Black neighborhoods is sold by Blacks.

And no, you can't tell me about the White people who actually bring the drugs into the country, ok? The EVIL black drug dealers, who actually sell it to black people are responsible.

And there is no amount of money, or charitable donation that the EVIL black - former crack dealers, and pimps, who are now raping the minds of young black men and women, with the garbage that passes for music, can give, to make up for the lives and communities they helped destroy. Every penny of the money they earn, is blood money.

And it is patently obvious that many inner city, wanna-be ganstas, can't tell the difference between art, and reality. Especially here in Baltimore where 150 Black people have been murdered by Black people so far this year.

And I don't give a rats ass about the crimes and evil perpetrated by people of other races.

Honestly seeka, (dropping "truth") I've listened to your rediculous attempts at justifying the ignorance that is responsible for the appauling, current state of affairs among inner city blacks across this country, and I feel sad for you, whether you like it or not.

Till this point, I was actually interested in seeing how you would attack the content of this thread. Your arguments are really quite pathetic, but expected from someone who is crazy enough to look at the above definition, and then come up with the most amazing BS to discredit the definition, just to hold on to the madness of being "Black".

Yes, CRAZY! Yes MADNESS!

You and those who believe as you do are both, BY DEFINITION! And all of your pitiful arguments, only further demonstrates your complete ignorance, which is a derivative of all the years you have worshiped the evil associated with the word black.

You can insult me, call me a racist, a self-hater, a white wanna be, anything you like, but I take a great deal of satisfation in knowing the one thing you won't call me is BLACK, because you realize that I am the complete opposite of you.

And that's worth a resounding, "Praise the Lord!" Even from a jabony like me, writing under the name of Satansque.


[edit on 24-6-2007 by SatansQue]



posted on Jun, 24 2007 @ 09:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by truthseeka
And what's with the "good slaves" stuff? The problem with you and many other black people not from America is that you're jealous of us black Americans. Even as you talk about the negative black images from stuff like hip hop, you're jealous of all the money the rappers have. Hell, you're even jealous of what black Americans in the middle class have.

And you talk about worldwide perception. Who cares? If you take your views on people from the media, too bad for you. The media is heavily biased in many aspects. The one relevant to this context is how you'll see a black American as a criminal or an athlete WAY before you'll see us as a businessman or a scientist. Those of us who are successful in areas like education and business are ignored by the media. This is so viewers like you can pigeonhole black Americans on this type of level in with gangstas and criminals; keep an eye on your TV, you'll get PLENTY of these depictions.



The attitude and style expressed in the hip-hop “identity” keeps blacks down. Almost all hip-hop, gangsta or not, is delivered with a cocky, confrontational cadence that is fast becoming—as attested to by the rowdies at KFC—a common speech style among young black males. Similarly, the arm-slinging, hand-hurling gestures of rap performers have made their way into many young blacks’ casual gesticulations, becoming integral to their self-expression.
The problem with such speech and mannerisms is that they make potential employers wary of young black men and can impede a young black’s ability to interact comfortably with co-workers and customers. The black community has gone through too much to sacrifice upward mobility to the passing kick of an adversarial hip-hop “identity.”

On a deeper level, there is something truly unsettling and tragic about the fact that blacks have become the main agents in disseminating debilitating—dare I say racist—images of themselves.
Rap guru Russell Simmons claims that “the coolest stuff about American culture—be it language, dress, or attitude—comes from the underclass. Always has and always will.” Yet back in the bad old days, blacks often complained—with some justification—that the media too often depicted blacks simply as uncivilized.
Today, even as television and films depict blacks at all levels of success, hip-hop sends the message that blacks are . . . uncivilized. I find it striking that the cry-racism crowd doesn’t condemn it.



posted on Jun, 24 2007 @ 09:51 AM
link   
this is abit of topic but how do u get a display pic
im new to this thanks ya all



posted on Jun, 24 2007 @ 10:00 AM
link   
CAPS CAPS CAPS!!! I'M POSTING IN ALL CAPS! MAYBE EVERYONE WILL SEE WHAT I HAVE TO SAY!! THEN AGAIN MAYBE NOT:


The headlines following Tuesday's tragedy said it all.

CBS had "Crowd attacks, kills man at Juneteenth festival," while ABC's website called the crowd a "mob," and those were just a few examples.

Austin's new police chief Art Acevedo calls the information "absolutely not accurate," and places part of the blame on the department he's set to take over on Thursday.


Please visit the link provided for the complete story.

www.news8austin.com...

gee, what a surprise. once again misinformation about the black community has been posted all over the country to remind everyone just how DAINGURIS them filthy nigras can be!!
i f....... hate mainstream media



posted on Jun, 24 2007 @ 10:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by karby
gee, what a surprise. once again misinformation about the black community has been posted all over the country to remind everyone just how DAINGURIS them filthy nigras can be!!


I hear you, karby!
And thanks for posting this. Yes, the media has a field day whenever it can. Not just about the black community, but any time it can sensationalize a story, it will.

I'm not sure it matters whether the violence in this case was related to Juneteenth. I don't know how most people would react, but I would not be part of a group of 20 people to attack and kill an innocent man...
Does it really matter if it was related to Juneteenth or not?


Originally posted by manzoor
this is abit of topic but how do u get a display pic
im new to this thanks ya all


manzoor I sent you a U2U. Click your Member Center button to see it.


[edit on 24-6-2007 by Benevolent Heretic]



posted on Jun, 24 2007 @ 10:37 AM
link   
to truthseeka and [the person who started this topic--i forget your name]:

please take care not to fall into the 'divide and conquer' trap that has been restraining all black people for centuries. separating 'we blacks' vs 'those blacks' is one of the main reasons why Afro people are one of the most repressed people across the entire globe: we are our own enemy. instead of attacking each other based on what little you know, why don't you try to find out more about the other and see what you have in common?

as the spawn of immigrant blacks, growing up, i've had some very bad experiences with black americans, which i won't get into. truth, is i hated them, for a while, even though i myself was born in this country. it took some years of a college reeducation to undo most of the damage done during my childhood, and while i'm not perfect, i do say that attacking or stereotyping someone, hell ANYONE, black or not, based on their race or place of origin is an incredibly stupid thing to do.

blacks from all across the world suffer from a stereotypical image of lazy, stupid, and worthless, and childlike. the fact that the both of you are attacking each other only helps to reinforce that.

[ guy who started this topic] quit listening to mainstream news, and get out and LEARN about black american culture. MSM only lets you see what it wants you to see and you aren't getting the whole story. truthseeka, get out and LEARN about the black diaspora outside of the US. contrary to what US history books tells you, it DOES exist. No [guy] the black man is NOT crazy. no, truthseeka while many blacks across the globe would like to have the wealth of black entertainers (who doesn't?), most would rather study health sciences or math sciences to help better their families and communities at home. it doesn't matter if you're born in america, or africa, or jamacia or whatever, because when the world looks at you, they don't see your country of origin first, they see is black first. just get out and learn something about each other. right now, the only thing you're doing is putting on a minstrel show for those who want you destroyed regardless of where you were born. and i can assure you, that even though they aren't posting they are enjoying this little spat very very much.

[edit on 24-6-2007 by karby]

[edit on 24-6-2007 by karby]

[edit on 24-6-2007 by karby]




top topics



 
18
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join