It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CameronFox
I'm not discounting anyones reports at all.
You are.
I also showed the documentation with a link to the PROTEC company's paper on 911. If you have read it, or decide to read it, I would like to know what you think about it.
You havent answered my question as to if you think the firefighters were covering something up.
I am quite certain that explosions were heard throughout the day at all different times.
I am not familiar with seismic activity...just from what i see on TV and read on line .etc..
What seismic activity was taking place just prior to the WTC7 Collapse are you questioning? The company that was operating thier equipment there on that day, state that there was nothing that showed a CD.
Officer Bartmer:"...and as I approached, came down, saw the big hub-bub going on around building 7. Walked around it. Saw a hole. I didn't see a hole big enough to knock a building down though."
Officer Bartmer:"I saw, you know, there was definately fire in the building, you know, but ... um, I didn't hear any, and you know maybe this is movie crap, i didn't hear any creaking or i didn't hear any indication that it was going to come down, and all of a sudden the radios exploded and everybody started screaming, "Get away. Get away. Get away from it." and I was like a dear in the headlights. And I look up. "
Officer Bartmer: "It was that moment, you know, "Get away", and I looked up... and... it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. And all the things started peeling in on itself and... I mean, there was an umbrella of crap seven feet over my head that I just stared at. Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running and the shi*ts hitting the ground behind me and the whole time your hearing "thoom. thoom. thoom. thoom. thoom." So. I think I know an explosion when I hear it."
Originally posted by CameronFox
BsBray,
Allow me to correct myself. Although I don't "discount" eyewitnesses, I do like to read into them and not always take them as face value.
1. Officer Bartmer claims his buddies got him a little drunk and made him watch Loose Change.
How big was the hole? What size hole in his opinion (of a poilicce officer) would be the appropriate size to knock down a building?
I just find it a bit suspect that dozens of others are reported as to hearing the creaking.
So, as the building started to fall he started hearing "explosions?" Is that typically how a CD happens? Of all the CD's I have listened to/ watched. The VAST majority of the explosions are before the collapse.
This is a pretty sick man who in my opinion is being used by the CT people to further their agenda.
As far as the seismograph stuff. Hey, I ADMIT when I'm not a professional [...] IF I am wrong.. .you know i admit it.
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
"Gash"?? Do you mean the black line that is running down the center of the building, or am I missing something?? Looks like how the building looks to me.
I can't think of anything that could create that in a building and it not get noticed.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Then you shouldn't have any problem when I think firefighters saying the damage in the back side of WTC7 was enough to bring it down, are talking out of their ass.
1. Officer Bartmer claims his buddies got him a little drunk and made him watch Loose Change.
Originally posted by bsbray11What's wrong with that?
How big was the hole? What size hole in his opinion (of a poilicce officer) would be the appropriate size to knock down a building?
Originally posted by bsbray11Ask him.
I just find it a bit suspect that dozens of others are reported as to hearing the creaking.
Originally posted by bsbray11Maybe they did, but obviously it wasn't consistent.
So, as the building started to fall he started hearing "explosions?" Is that typically how a CD happens? Of all the CD's I have listened to/ watched. The VAST majority of the explosions are before the collapse.
Originally posted by bsbray11So what's your point? Does the idea of trying to hide the charges make any sense to you, or do you intentionally ignore it to make your arguments? Why does everything have to be comparable for a stereotypical CD for it to have been a CD at all?
The answer is it doesn't, and you use fallacious logic because you're biased and you can't form a decent argument without resorting to that kind of crap. If you can, then do it.
This is a pretty sick man who in my opinion is being used by the CT people to further their agenda.
Originally posted by bsbray11So you think this man is mentally ill, in other words, and that's why he thinks he heard explosions and thinks WTC7 had explosives in it. Imo, you're sicker than he is.
Originally posted by bsbray11As far as the seismograph stuff. Hey, I ADMIT when I'm not a professional [...] IF I am wrong.. .you know i admit it.
No, you just avoid half of my questions and then say you're not qualified to answer when things aren't going where you like them.
I'm going to start doing that, too, ok? Just for you. Remember this.
Originally posted by Netstriker
It is amazing how people around here talk about this as if they were all structural engineers and experts on demolition and other related matters.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Protec was operating portable field seismographs at construction sites in Manhattan and Brooklyn on 9/11, and these seismographs were recording groud vibrations throughout the timeframe of events at Ground Zero. These measurements, when combined with more specific and detailed seismic data recorded at Columbia University's Lamount-Doherty Earth Observatory, help to provide an unfiltered, purely scientific view of each event.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Originally posted by mirageofdeceit
"Gash"?? Do you mean the black line that is running down the center of the building, or am I missing something?? Looks like how the building looks to me.
I can't think of anything that could create that in a building and it not get noticed.
The most on-topic point in a bit. The gash is there after the main towers' collapse, along with the SW corner damage. It's not part of the building. It has its "minor damage" at roof level, runs down tween columns 5+6 on the upper floors, also seems evident at the same spot down at about the 18th floor and at the 7th, seemingly cut in from roof to ground. I'm working up a graphic of the south face with all damage I can see mapped onto it. I'll have it done in a couple of days, should be cool.
ABSTRACT:
This article discusses the changes in tall building design practice after the World Trade Centre (WTC) buildings collapse. Although many suggestions were made post-9/11, regarding the improvement of the performance of buildings, no major changes have yet been implemented. These suggestions and the lessons learnt from the collapse are discussed in the paper.
Originally posted by mfsheldon
Of the few that you can see are steel frame, there were only a few partial collapses and they were straight down.
A few buildings were turned over on their sides not due to collapse but because the landfill underneath them physically laid them over with out damaging the structure.
Originally posted by Griff
Have they ever supplied said siesmographs? Just curious as I've never heard of seeing them. Maybe you could forward them to Labtop for analysis? If not, why are they not in public view?
Protec is recognized as a global leader in the field of Vibration Prediction, Monitoring, and Structure Inspections.
For over 30 years, Protec personnel have studied the effects of vibrations on structures as related to construction, demolition and blasting operations. From the world’s largest building implosions to the smallest road-reconstruction jobs,
Originally posted by LaBTop
I assure you, you don't need any more intelligence than you possessed when in basic school, to follow my reasoning about the seismic anomalies.
So don't avoid it based on lack of seismic knowledge, because you don't need it !
It's all about GPS timestamps, and simple additions of available data from sources from 2 government institutes, LDEO and NIST.
Which both used the exact same GPS timestamps, but NIST can't fit theirs to cover the LDEO timestamps. Even after revamping, in quite a blatant manner, their original timestamps. They still are way off.
I CHALLENGE YOU TO PROOF ME WRONG.
EDIT: forgot the links,
www.abovetopsecret.com... and page 2,
and :
www.studyof911.com...
[edit on 20/5/07 by LaBTop]