It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by nick7261
How can you tell that the columns weren't severed? Are you seeing something in the photo that I'm missing?
Originally posted by ratskywatsky
Got a link to the video you are referring to? Since the towers collapsed into their own footprints in a cloud of ultrafine dust particles do to the collapsing weight of floors, according to the official party line, what could have been ejected perpendicularly with such force and at such a great distance and possibly bypassing the building in between? If there actually was a big gash in the base of 7WTC it was most likely caused by some of Lucky Larry's pre-planted explosives.
Originally posted by ferretman2
Griff - you have obviously never been to New York or Downtown for that matter to make such a stupid statement.
My building was a little over 3 blocks away not 9.
Most of the buildings downtown are low buildings, The building I was in was 24 stories, there was not much to block the shockwave from the inital explosion, and if you actually recall numerous windows were blown out at buildings closer to the towers.
Oh but that's right I was fooled and didn't watch the second plane hit the towers nor when I was a block away at the corner of Liberty and Trinity the 4th generation nuke failed to vaporize me.
Get a life.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Originally posted by Griff
Nice try in trying to decieve there Deltaboy. That is the Bankers Building and NOT WTC 7. If the columns of WTC 7 were severed, the OP photo would have looked something like this and not straight lined damaged.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Deceiving? I never say that building was WTC7. Look at my post in discussing about how other buildings were damaged by debris from the towers.
Originally posted by Griff
OK. Sorry for taking it the wrong way. Anyway, does that building look like it's about to collapse? The original photo showing the gash in the OP show's less damage than that building. So, why did "everyone" know that WTC 7 was going to come down from less damage than surrounding buildings? Why did they fight fires in surrounding buildings but abandoned WTC 7?
Originally posted by bsbray11
So anybody figured out how this thing caused a collapse from the bottom floor yet?
(Not a one-liner. )
[edit on 15-5-2007 by bsbray11]
Originally posted by Inannamute
*sigh*.. if it's been around for a month, how come you only post it the day after I post the images?
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
If I remember correctly, there were fears of its structural soundness. The fact that the Bankers building didn't catch on fire *could* have been wat saved it.
Originally posted by Griff
OK. Sorry for taking it the wrong way. Anyway, does that building look like it's about to collapse?
The original photo showing the gash in the OP show's less damage than that building.
So, why did "everyone" know that WTC 7 was going to come down from less damage than surrounding buildings?
Why did they fight fires in surrounding buildings but abandoned WTC 7?