It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GwionX
Not to mention that the smoke from the fire never really allowed cameras to capture the full extent of damage. Only glimpses, and I can tell you from those glimpses (when the smoke cleared momentarily) the South face of WTC 7 was badly damaged.
The uninformed always want to look at the "backside" of WTC 7 to assess damage. Those that peddle WTC 7 Conspiracy theories never/rarely show the South face of WTC 7-- Reminiscent of an unscrupulous used car salesman who stands in front of a badly damaged section of a car he is trying to sell, while saying the vehicle is in good condition with just a couple of "scratches, and dings." Constantly trying to keep the potential buyer from seeing the "bad parts" and downplaying them, or changing the subject when they do see.
Because of the extent of the damage-- The firefighters weren't looking at WTC 7 from a camera 10 blocks to the North. They were on the ground at its base, and I have come to the informed conclusion that the firefighters were able to assess a badly damaged and rapidly deteriorating building standing within feet of them.
WTC 7 was known to have been cleared of human life before its collapse. If you were a firefighter and you knew there might be trapped people still alive in say the rubble of WTC 1 or under the caved in roof of WTC 6..Where would you concentrate your efforts--provided you only had the water to do one or the other?
Originally posted by CameronFox
I cant say for certain that NIST "over estimated". They are showing from a top view. I believe the photos that show the damage at the 48th floor shows wider damage.
Originally posted by Griff
Question. How can you tell me, when you even say that the smoke only allowed glimpses. Have you seen videos or photos that I haven't?
Or were you there to report said damage? Do you know the difference between structural damage and cosmetic damage? I ask that not as a smart ass but as a serious question.
I don't know what this has to do with the thread except to ridicule people and start a flame war. Especially since we are talking about photos of the South Facade in this thread.
Yet, at the more damaged towers, they were inept and couldn't tell that they would collapse? I mean no disrespect to the firefighters there.
Good reasoning and I can turn it around on you. As you say, why would they concentrate efforts somewhere else when there could be survivors in WTC 1. Well, why did they clear out WTC 7 so fast, when there could have been survivors in WTC 1 still?
12.10-12.15 Noon - Firefighters rescue three people trapped in WTC7. Two of these had gone to the 23rd floor before 10AM, but been trapped around the sixth floor by smoke and debris caused by WTC1 collapse at 10.28AM.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Thanks for posting this. You can see where again NIST has overestimated the damage. Count the column lines. The damage is between column line 5 and 6 from the s-w corner. This is the little "box" that NIST has shown in their sketch. Now, where is the rest of the damage that they show? I don't see any (at least worth mentioning structurally).
At a casual glance, Spak's image would seem to confirm Boyle's testimony of a huge hole in the middle of the the south face, however a closer analysis reveals that the damage we see is actually located on the extreme west side of the south face and joins with the south west corner. The hole in the south face described by some eye witnesses (used by NIST as the basis for damage estimation) and the south west corner damage are one and the same, thereby placing the hole far from columns 79 - 80 and thus invalidating NIST's collapse hypothesis.
Originally posted by Karilla
...the damage we see is actually located on the extreme west side of the south face and joins with the south west corner.
www.studyof911.com...
Add the survival of the pedestrian bridge after WTC1's collapse, and the fact that the mechanical penthouse (housing the vents and elevator winches) is gone within a second of the collapse starting, which is even used to indicate the severity of the lower-level damage, and not only doesn't this add-up... it reeks to high heaven.
Originally posted by Caustic Logic
Big Q: We're told 7 was evacuated before collapse, but how about before this debris pummeling? If it was as deep as the NIST says and caused those firs throughout the building, I'd expect some dead folk. Any reports?
Originally posted by CameronFox
Has anyone heard any dates that NIST will have it's report done on WTC7? Also, what if their data adds up...what if the evidence, proof, mathmatical calculations are all correct? Will the truth movement say..ok...WTC-7 was legit...or will everyone be screaming SHILLS! NWO COVER UP! ...etc.
I'm just curious.
Originally posted by Netstriker
It is amazing how people around here talk about this as if they were all structural engineers
Originally posted by PartChimp
I'd like to throw some props out to caustic and cameron on this thread. Griff, as well, for adding your counter-point. It seems to me that the more digging is done, the more the "truth" movement is going to have to face reality. The United States of America may not be the NWO juggernaut that the majority of the CT'ers assert that it is. The fact of the matter is quite simple, to me anyhow; we're the jock that got punched in the throat by the ugly kid in the back of the class that everyone made fun of.