It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CameronFox
Originally posted by LaBTop
I assure you, you don't need any more intelligence than you possessed when in basic school, to follow my reasoning about the seismic anomalies.
So don't avoid it based on lack of seismic knowledge, because you don't need it !
It's all about GPS timestamps, and simple additions of available data from sources from 2 government institutes, LDEO and NIST.
Which both used the exact same GPS timestamps, but NIST can't fit theirs to cover the LDEO timestamps. Even after revamping, in quite a blatant manner, their original timestamps. They still are way off.
I CHALLENGE YOU TO PROOF ME WRONG.
EDIT: forgot the links,
www.abovetopsecret.com... and page 2,
and :
www.studyof911.com...
[edit on 20/5/07 by LaBTop]
Hi LabTop.. sorry... been busy....Instead of me reading the hundreds of pages... can you compress these endless links to one simple page... Id love to give your challenge a shot.... (not saying I can prove or disprove) it's just that you reference MANY different sites and thread.... what is it that you want disproven?
Originally posted by coughymachine
CL
Nice job. The collapse initiated on the east side. We appear to have no confirmed damage on that side.
Mr.Herbert
New Blood
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 8
.....I love debunking the chaps at ATS. Typically they are all loose change junkies, so they are easy. Some although claim they are engineers and have quite a bit of knowledge. .... I am reaching out for some assistance. ....
LaBtop is one of the prize pupils over at ATS and studyof911, so it would be incredible to shoot this guy down!
Thanks in advance for any help!
Mr. Herbert
Originally posted by LaBTop
LaBtop is one of the prize pupils over at ATS and studyof911, so it would be incredible to shoot this guy down!
Thanks in advance for any help!
LaBtop is one of the prize pupils over at ATS and studyof911, so it would be incredible to shoot this guy down!
So Called experts at LDEO
"There is no scientific basis for the conclusion that explosions brought down the towers," Lerner-Lam tells PM. "That representation of our work is categorically incorrect and not in context."
Originally posted by LaBTop
CameronFox, my new fan.
Nice to know at last, why exactly you are posting here.
Originally posted by CameronFox
LaBtop, in regards to the seismic activity, please see
wtc.nist.gov... section 3.5 pg22
Note that the building collapse times are defined to be when the entire building was first observed to start to collapse. In the case of WTC7 a penthouse on the roof sank before the main collapse started.
The Adjusted time was 5:20:52
The total visible collapse time is about 14/15 seconds. The outer wall collapse took about 6.5 seconds. So then minus roughly 8 seconds to the point of the kink, and you get roughly 5:20:44.
LEDO time is 5:20:42
youtube.com...
The total time of the seismic activity is 18 seconds. Note again the ADJUSTED time for television broadcast is 5:20:44. You should expect some seismic activity just before the kink. There is also a slight margin of error within in the times. Note (in the video) at about 51 seconds in, the kink starts, at 59 sec. the outer wall starts falling, at roughly 1:06 the collapse ends.
I hope this answers your questions.
See
wtc.nist.gov... section 3.5 pg22
Note that the building collapse times are defined to be when the entire building was first observed to start to collapse. In the case of WTC7 a penthouse on the roof sank before the main collapse started.
The Adjusted time was 5:20:52
The total visible collapse time is about 14/15 seconds. The outer wall collapse took about 6.5 seconds. So then minus roughly 8 seconds to the point of the kink, and you get roughly 5:20:44.
LEDO time is 5:20:42
youtube.com...
The total time of the seismic activity is 18 seconds. Note again the ADJUSTED time for television broadcast is 5:20:44. I would expect some seismic activity just before the kink. There is also a slight margin of error within in the times. Note (in the video) at about 51 seconds in, the kink starts, at 59 sec. the outer wall starts falling, at roughly 1:06 the collapse ends.
The other paper by Gordon and quickandthedead is toast. The Pavel-Hlava video ended that with time stamps of both impacts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by Kent1 : 22nd May 2007 at 03:34 PM.
Copyright
Any post or article published on the JREF forum by a Member is the copyright of the Member and may not be reproduced, copied or otherwise re-published without the express permission of the Member.
Originally posted by talisman
LeftBehind
I suggest reading LapTop's thread on this found here;