It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Stop Iran now

page: 4
5
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 03:35 PM
link   



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 06:56 PM
link   
Stop USA now!

You have Absolute Power, you have an idiot in control that needs to be taken out. DO IT! Protect our future and get the freedom back. This world is ready to fall, no more. I remember Nothing. (Because this world is a lie)
screw them don't let them do it again. In fact this president awhatever was a terrorist that held our people then. Get it done!



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 07:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by osram
Stop USA now!


Lmao. I was just re-reading the OP and was thinking exactly along the lines of your post.


And for those wishing for an attack on Iran...

Do you people have ANY idea how stupid that is? Your essentially asking for the world to descend into chaos, because thats what will happen if Iran is attacked.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 07:11 PM
link   
I don't care if it was Iraqi or Iranian waters, I have no sympathy for any soldier captured on foreign soil or sea, regardless of the reason.
furthermore I am sick and tired of people constantly complaining of countless killed troops ,when we should not be over there in the first place......ever hear the old saying all is fair in love and war!



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 07:46 PM
link   
Osram - I understand people from countries not threatened by terrorism
would not understand, but Iran is a problem that needs to be dealt with.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 08:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by u4itornot
Osram - I understand people from countries not threatened by terrorism
would not understand, but Iran is a problem that needs to be dealt with.


No offense but how ignorant of you, u4itornot. I am against it, you know.
Just because I'm from switzerland doesn't mean our country couldn't potentially be attacked in a terroristic manner.

Even if the probability around here is pretty low, i have to say that it isn't higher in any other Non-Warzone country.

Every country is actually threatened by terrorism. The only difference is: Where they want more control they need more "Fear of Terrorism". Germany, London. Whatever.. All the same.

It's called psychological warfare.

How contradicting to prevent terrorism by attacking a foreign country overseas.

Maybe you should come back when you've read a bit more about true history, society and economy.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 08:39 PM
link   
Well history says Iran well use these hostages to promote their form of terrorism, economicaly they are pushing up the price of oil because of their actions. And if you read the links I provided you would see that
they are the aggressor here. Pray for the Britain hostages they did nothing wrong.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 08:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by u4itornot
Well history says Iran well use these hostages to promote their form of terrorism, economicaly they are pushing up the price of oil because of their actions. And if you read the links I provided you would see that
they are the aggressor here. Pray for the Britain hostages they did nothing wrong.


Wrong.

History says Iran will probably use the hostages to promote "pressure" in regards of UN-Sanctions. They are simply gaining a voice and showing the world that they are here, and they are able to capture hostiles. Just as the US does in covert all the time.

I don't know how capturing 15 Soldiers would push the price of oil, but I guess that's your form of factual argumentation.

I think the US is pushing the price of oil much more than Iran. By performing an Agressor-War over 4 years and playing their childish Political, Social and Economical Games.

As far as i can tell the waters which are in question are debatable since a long time. It is unclear whom they belong to. The soldiers were on a Civil boat and that in itself is a bit wierd. The exact circumstances are not known.

After all those soldiers are not dead yet. If you wan't to know what a clear form of "Agressive" War is you just need to look @ the US-War in Irak.

Period.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 09:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by u4itornot
Osram - I understand people from countries not threatened by terrorism
would not understand, but Iran is a problem that needs to be dealt with.


What kind of psuedo-american are you?
You are most definatly not from the 'Home of the brave' or you wouldnt be so scared of Iran.

Iran needs to be dealt with, much like we need to 'find Osama' right?
Iran needs to be dealt with while 10,000 illegal immigrants poor across our border daily, right?
Iran needs to be dealt with while our soldiers wallow in squallor at Walter Reid, right?

Get a grip.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 09:08 PM
link   
People need to realise, there is not one evil side, you dont have to choose one side, We have to realise that both countries need to be changed for the better to stop all this pathetic war stuff.

Stop picking on certain countries and begin to realise we need to make a change to the WHOLE world, TOGETHER.

We need new leaders who actually would want to work together, and not be greedy and power needy. If the world works together many world problems can be fixed.

So I say again if we want a better world, we gotta work together. Or we will be doomed with world problems forever.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 09:53 PM
link   
At risk of sounding inflamatory

Sheesh! If I want to hear from warmongerers that never 'earned their chops' in uniform...let alone in combat...I can tune in to the likes of Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh...Newt Gingrich.

Aging neocons still trying to earn their macho with no personal risk? (OP children)...I could hit their names with a dart...blindfolded.


Peace &
Good Fortune
OBE1

Edit: SP

[edit on 26-3-2007 by OBE1]



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 09:56 PM
link   
Hey man I support you all the way. I hope the best for you and hope you come home OK. God Bless



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 10:11 PM
link   
Won't be making the trip mate...I was released four decades ago.

Semper Fi!


Peace &
Good Fortune
OBE1



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 10:14 PM
link   
Iran really seems to be the one encouraging a war more than anyone else...so I say let them have it.



posted on Mar, 25 2007 @ 10:33 PM
link   
Suggest we not concern ourselves with Iran too much untill the hostages are released in good health and spirits.

THEN, the US of A might ask a more local Mid-East Nation to perform a task. Put an end to oil-bean ego's and future nuc threats. 24 hr warning.

Dallas



posted on Mar, 26 2007 @ 04:02 AM
link   


Do you people have ANY idea how stupid that is?


So we just sit on our backsides and let Iran do what the hell it wants eh?

We just let them keep ahold of those servicemenm and one woman, and let them so what ever they please eh??

I do not think so.....




No offense but how ignorant of you, u4itornot. I am against it, you know.

Just because I'm from switzerland doesn't mean our country couldn't potentially be attacked in a terroristic manner.


How ignorant of you sir, if I may add, how would you feel if it was your citezens who were detained by Iran

Im sure for one you would be asking the uk and others in Europe to step in and help your country out....

Im also sure the UK and the EU would be the first to stick up for your country if this did happen to any of ur citizens.




Iran needs to be dealt with, much like we need to 'find Osama' right?


Agrees with you 100%, least our Leaders dont go around, saying they want to wipe another country of the face of the earth....



posted on Mar, 26 2007 @ 04:22 AM
link   
Are you kidding me....first off, you can't choose sides that quickly, maybe they were in Iran waters who knows....You can't go to war over it, how about all the people being illegally held in Guantanamo Bay...yea thats right illegally, bet many more then 15, try hundreds, but no one seems to care about that....it's only wrong if they do it...I understand.



posted on Mar, 26 2007 @ 04:29 AM
link   
The most likely reason why the Ambassador hasn't been allowed to see them yet, is because it's all part of the "game". Tit for Tat. You threaten us, we threaten you. It's as simple as that.

Iran has been a pawn in these sorts of power games for a very, very long time. We have to remember that Mossadegh was overthrown by an MI6 (who then talked the CIA into it) organised coup, the British have probably caused more damage to Iran over the last couple of centuries than anyone else..... a touch of bitterness is hardly surprising is it?

Mossadegh began to make Iran stand on it's own, and we killed him for it, handed the country to a ruthless dictator and finally to Theocratic Tyrants. Unsurprisingly the Iranian's get quite jittery about percieved threats.



posted on Mar, 26 2007 @ 04:43 AM
link   
According to this article, we can be glad that there werent USA troops involved. Otherwise we might've found ourselves talking about the battle already.



The Independent.

US troops 'would have fought Iranian captors'
By Terri Judd in Bahrain
Published: 26 March 2007

A senior American commander in the Gulf has said his men would have fired on the Iranian Revolutionary Guard rather than let themselves be taken hostage.

In a dramatic illustration of the different postures adopted by British and US forces working together in Iraq, Lt-Cdr Erik Horner - who has been working alongside the task force to which the 15 captured Britons belonged - said he was "surprised" the British marines and sailors had not been more aggressive.

Asked by The Independent whether the men under his command would have fired on the Iranians, he said: "Agreed. Yes. I don't want to second-guess the British after the fact but our rules of engagement allow a little more latitude. Our boarding team's training is a little bit more towards self-preservation."

news.independent.co.uk...

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


Now that this concerns british troops, i have more hope that this incident will be solved more easily.

[edit on 26-3-2007 by Mammoth]



posted on Mar, 26 2007 @ 04:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
The captured brits have admitted they were in Iran waters... that to me has more weight than the british saying they wernt.

and you would admit to anything if you were stood over an open grave you had just dug with a gun stuck in your ear, as happened the last time UK personel were abducted by the Iranian Islamo-Nazi party



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join