It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Sometimes people can say something or ask a question out of genuine curiosity. Nothing more.
Originally posted by ceci2006
Respectfully, I disagree. I am not asking you to feel guilty.
18)To hear others say they don't have guilt about the negative parts of your heritiage and cultural history.
Sweeping racist behavior under the rug is what a lot of people of your ilk says....along with not feeling any guilt.
As long as the lesson of "not feeling guilt" is taught over and over, you and your ilk are breeding a generation of kids who can say and do anything derogatory to a person of color without feeling a sense of shame or remorse.
Because some posters on this thread don't want to "feel guilty" about racism.
I've personally learned that "not feeling guilt" makes you feel a lot better
But forgetting about what Black people experienced … and not feeling guilt about it is considered by some as part and parcel of the course.
If you don't feel any guilt here about having "white privilege" … there is a definite problem afoot.
I wonder if someone who doesn't "feel any guilt" would say the same things to a Jewish person that they would say to Black people?
How does that weigh in with our discussion about … the ability not to feel guilt?
Does he act like he feels any "guilt" over the past?
Furthermore, he doesn't feel any guilt over what has occurred to Blacks. His reasoning might fit in with some people here when they don't want to "feel guilt" over what has happened.
By only taking the "I feel no guilt route", it is quite apathetic. No way around it.
Some whites have developed their lack of guilt feelings,
some whites have developed a sense of superiority and licked that "white guilt" clean away
the person who does the "nasty attack" often gets of "Scot free" without feeling any recourse or guilt about it. In fact, they get defended and patted on the back for it every time.
As a result, the motion picture buries the problem and lays the blame elsewhere while giving white movie goers a feeling of "not having guilt"
But for the white movie goers, the same scene can pass by and feel that they've learned nothing, except to throw that guilt away and feel happy that it isn't "their type of racism" anymore.
No, I don't want courtesy from you because I learned long ago that you have no guilt or manners for what you do.
And she sure as heck didn't feel any guilt.
Especially with no empathy along with your admitted lack of guilt.
Since you don't feel any guilt and you don't care, no.
You can say all you want about not having to have any permission or guilt to feel the way you do.
Originally posted by Nygdan
I mean, why, in the world, should anyone have any sympathy for whites who feel that they are being oppressed?? And its not like racism is 'dead' amoung whites now anyway.
Originally posted by ceci2006
I said that in response to your apathy of having a conscience and not understanding what happens as a result of institutional racism. It had nothing about telling anyone, let alone yourself, about feeling guilt.
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
If your father robbed banks for a living, should we keep you and your continued off-spring in jail because of it?! No? Its not fair?
Well it's not fair to judge people by what their ancestors did either.
Originally posted by intrepid
Could you break this down in a few sentences as THIS may be the core of what I'm talking about.
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
If your father robbed banks for a living, should we keep you and your continued off-spring in jail because of it?! No? Its not fair?
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by ceci2006
I said that in response to your apathy of having a conscience and not understanding what happens as a result of institutional racism. It had nothing about telling anyone, let alone yourself, about feeling guilt.
Could you break this down in a few sentences as THIS may be the core of what I'm talking about.
Originally posted by Koka
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
If your father robbed banks for a living, should we keep you and your continued off-spring in jail because of it?! No? Its not fair?
Depends, are the kids still living off the proceeds of that bank job?
Originally posted by interestedalways
Calling someone a racist is no different than calling them another insultive name and is against the principles of ATS.
We don't know who is or isn't what, so get over it and move on to something more productive and stop calling each other names.
An individuals beliefs are their own and what each chooses to share in a public forum should be taken in it's written context and not judged as "racist" or "mean" or "ugly", etc. These are judgements of one's character and aren't usually useful on this site unless being used to expose a lie or something like that.
Dig deeper if you want to make someone look bad.
Originally posted by foxywhiskers
I just feel as tho it's tunring into one of those historical slinging matches.
Originally posted by Koka
No, I think that the analogy doesn't suit the argument regarding the carrying of guilt. I'm sure there must be a better one, not that I think we need it, because you have made your point time and time again, you're just having problems getting people to agree with it.
We seem to spend more time arguing than thinking.
Originally posted by Koka
Originally posted by Arcane Demesne
If your father robbed banks for a living, should we keep you and your continued off-spring in jail because of it?! No? Its not fair?
Depends, are the kids still living off the proceeds of that bank job?
Originally posted by chissler
Those who wish to play the card are merely attempting to victimize themself and are not willing to accept the true reasoning for a reaction. Sometimes we need to look at ourselves rather than passing everyone off as a bigot.
But in the same breath, "we" as whites, should understand that we are not being faced with genocide, torture, or slavery. The extent of our suffering is emotional, which is far better than what others have been through. Even though it is wrong, it could be worse.
Originally posted by intrepid
I'd reread the thread if you think that. Without preconceptions.
Originally posted by Chissler
Are you implying that the children have committed a crime, and should be held accountable?
Originally posted by ceci2006
I also wrote that one should "throw white guilt away". I know you don't remember that...
I don't care about your guilt. I care about your conscience.
You have no empathy.