It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
yfxxx said
Most importantly, no testimonials (by no-one, not even the POTUS ), only physical evidence! We've had enough stories by now. For starters, the evidence could be: - Photographs of artifacts on the surface of the alleged facility, like e.g. vents, access doors, surveillance equipment, intrusion sensors, whatever. Photos must include a readable display of a hand-held GPS receiver, so that others can independently verify the location of said artifacts. There must be some access to the facility, and because the surface is allegedly no restricted area, one should be able to obtain such photographic evidence. - Videos of operations near the alleged base, in a quality which makes it possible to actually discern something. Nighttime video which shows only blobs of light won't do. Again, a GPS display must be in frame at least once. (As for the GPS data requirement, it's simply necessary because otherwise you could photograph/film just about anything anywhere.) More advanced evidence would involve smuggling of material by base personnel. So, photographs and videos from inside the base would be appreciated, together with GPS receiver data. So far, all this evidence could also be faked. Therefore the more complex (and therefore difficult to fake for amateurs) a video is, the more compelling it is as evidence. Therefore I exclude printed documents, because these are just too easy to fake.. Sorry, but extraordinary claims require more than "vanilla" evidence. Finally, the best evidence would of course be physical artifacts, like, say, an alien tool. I think we can assume that the aliens brought some of their hardware themselves. A metallurgic lab can quickly prove, if some artifact is of terrestrial origin or not. At least, a piece of metal which could be extraterrestrial takes more means to fake than are available to the general public. I agree that such an alien artifact would only be very strong evidence of the presence of extraterrestrials on this planet, but not necessarily at Dulce.
Originally posted by yfxxx
Originally posted by shadow fax
i have a secret place in my house where i keep some extra cash, im not telling you where that secret hidden place is: does it really exist?
Why not? There is nothing unusual at all about such a hidden place.
What you apparently do not understand is:
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!
If I say I've seen a deer in the woods near my home, you might believe me at face value, or be content with evidence which shows that there is indeed a wood in the vicinity of my home, where the existence of deer has been documented in the past. There's nothing unusual about my claim.
If, on the other hand, I claim that I've seen a unicorn in the woods, you should ask for much more evidence, simply because the existence of a living unicorn totally contradicts accepted knowledge about this species (i.e., that it's only a fairy tale being). In such a case, you should not be convinced, if my only evidence is my own word and, say, a phony-looking document saying that unicorns had been seen in the woods in 1648.
If you demand proof, then its only logical that you fund the aquisition of that proof.
As I already said, I mainly wanted to know if there exists any compelling evidence for "Dulce". I do not "demand" evidence, let alone proof. If none comes forward, I will simply continue to file the "Dulce" story away as a tall tale.
I can tell BMW inc. that i want one of their top of the line limo's but without paying for it, i wont even get an official picture of it.
False analogy. Everyone knows that BMW makes high-end cars, so the claim that they have "special" models, which are not generally shown to the public, is effectively self-evident. If, on the other hand, someone claimed that they also make interstellar spaceships, I definitely wouldn't even consider believing this until they show at least a good photograph and some technical data.
Regards
yf
Originally posted by shadow fax
for further explanation regarding the futility of yfxxx's and Tim's quest please refer to the idea's of some smart dudes:
en.wikipedia.org...'s_teapot
Russell's teapot, sometimes called the Celestial Teapot, was an analogy first coined by the philosopher Bertrand Russell, intended to refute the idea that the burden of proof lies upon the sceptic to disprove unfalsifiable claims of religions.
Originally posted by Mike_A
"yes. what has been, beyond a shadow of a doubt, proven is that if this secret hidden underground base does exist:
...
but as long as nobody starts digging, nothing is proven conclusively."
Shadow, you’ve contradicted yourself there a bit haven’t you. It’s been proven to exist beyond a shadow of a doubt but at the same time it hasn’t been proven conclusively?
Why do you seem to be so against John providing evidence? Are you saying you’re happy to believe anything he says without evidence? If so why?
Originally posted by shadow fax
Originally posted by yfxxx
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!
hmmm, ever heard of Christianity?
Originally posted by shadow fax
like i said: checkout christianity and the story about the main character. see what i mean?
so if JL or anyone else tells you that they have compelling evidence then you believe it? thats easy!
Originally posted by ellroy
you're running in circles folk.
the man was politely asked to provide evidence, to be specific, this:
yfxxx said
...
that is specific enough, i believe.
so unless some evidence along those lines is provided we can make a conclusion that Dulce base is made up or very questionable at best.
(by 'we' i mean those who don't believe in fairy tales)
give the man time to gather the evidence and present it. he can't do it if he's arguing about it here with you .
As I already said, I mainly wanted to know if there exists any compelling evidence for "Dulce". I do not "demand" evidence, let alone proof. If none comes forward, I will simply continue to file the "Dulce" story away as a tall tale.
Originally posted by shadow fax
you "want to know if there exists" and "do not demand evidence, let alone proof". hence my question. i interpret this as: "i dont need to physically see proof, someone just needs to tell me if it exists".
granted, english is not my mother tongue,
but i think my reading/writing skills arent too bad.
Originally posted by yfxxx
I don't believe in the "Dulce base" for the same reason I don't believe in Santa Claus, fairies, unicorns, dragons and almost any gods which have been worshipped in human history.
Originally posted by johnlear
How about an alien tool that was rectangular with smooth rounded edges about 1 inch wide by 2 inches long and about 1/2" thick? Sapphire in color and so smooth it is slippery and difficult to hold on to. It looks like a large precious stone and would definately rival anything that could be bought at the most prestigious jewelry boutiques on New York's Fifth Avenue. Would you buy this as an alien tool?
Originally posted by Mike_A
So why can’t he post the evidence for those who have this supposed requisite of UFO understanding and how do you I am not one of them?