It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kerkinana walsky
3 years with no peer reviewed papers and no evidence either architecturally or artifactually of any kind
thats a big fat zero then
What are chances that scientists are going to accept a theory which contradicts the vasrt majority of what they think they know about histroy? none. That is not really a valid point. The peer review process should be called the sneer review process.
Originally posted by Skeptik101
Originally posted by kerkinana walsky
3 years with no peer reviewed papers and no evidence either architecturally or artifactually of any kind
thats a big fat zero then
What are chances that scientists are going to accept a theory which contradicts the vasrt majority of what they think they know about histroy? none. That is not really a valid point. The peer review process should be called the sneer review process.