It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by newtron25
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but if private research is to be conducted in archaeology then the work must also be coordinated with and supported by a university department, or at least the work must refer back to work done within that system.
Yes, science is built upon standards. However, consider this: what if those standards have been turned so sharply to produce profit so as to influence how the greater researchers and minds are given the obvious choice of following the funding to pursue their theories.
Although Osmanagic is a victim of his own avarice and over-zealous pursuit of his hypothesis, has he not also partially been unduly forced out of the establishment because of A) location of the site, B) possibility that the site may be of medieval importance, but not directly related to British medieval history and, C) unorthodoxy of his premise in beginning his research and, most importantly D) going outside the traditional university/privately supported and endorsed archaeological channels to do this work?
Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by newtron25
I hope your mind will be equally open to entertaining the possibility that while the man did not find a pyramid, there is a possibility that he has inadvertently found a very large, and very significant archaeological dig in its own right.
In fact, he didn't.
He was digging on a site with a number of known archaeological areas of interest, including a medieval graveyard and a very old Roman fortress. He was "digging" (I've been on digs, thank you) with a backhoe and bulldozer.
Nobody was sifting the dirt from the site (did you notice that they never found old buttons, etc?)
And if this is the case, and if the current researcher is not fit for the job, let's get somebody else in there.
If they can get him out of there. That's the problem.
He's currently been denied permits to continue because (as the Ministry concluded) what's being done there is not archaeology and he's damaging the material that is known to be there. He and his supporters are shrieking (and leveling charges of being "fascist tools" at the Ministry of Culture):
www.javno.com...
Yes, this is most likely a multi-layer site with care needed to be taken to preserve what exists at each level and an organization in the cataloging process that will separate different times and cultures.
...much of which he's already damaged, to the dismay of archaeologists worldwide. And your dig techniques are actually slower than his "bulldoze it and trim it" tactics. What slowed him down was officials starting to be suspicious of his methods.
If this was already a known medieval site, then are you telling me it has already been surveyed and determined to be of no value? Is that your opinion or someone else's, Byrd?
Visoki was built on Visočica hill, at a height of 766 meters, and 300 meters above the valley where the modern town of Visoko is located. By the time of the Turkish conquest of Bosnia, the old town was probably destroyed and never reconsturcted. Few remnants of old Visoki remain, most being preserved in the town's museum. In situ evidence include the remains of foundations of the towers, walls and gates of Visoki. A model has been reconstructed according to plans of Đoko Mazalić made in 1953, and the old royal town of Visoki is a national monument of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Originally posted by Marduk
If this was already a known medieval site, then are you telling me it has already been surveyed and determined to be of no value? Is that your opinion or someone else's, Byrd?
it was a royal town
it had been properly excavated by archaeologists and was a UNESCO world heritage site and national monument
en.wikipedia.org...
Visoki was built on Visočica hill, at a height of 766 meters, and 300 meters above the valley where the modern town of Visoko is located. By the time of the Turkish conquest of Bosnia, the old town was probably destroyed and never reconsturcted. Few remnants of old Visoki remain, most being preserved in the town's museum. In situ evidence include the remains of foundations of the towers, walls and gates of Visoki. A model has been reconstructed according to plans of Đoko Mazalić made in 1953, and the old royal town of Visoki is a national monument of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Originally posted by newtron25You appear to be qualified since I have never been on a dig and you have.
What recommendations do you have for this site?
If this was already a known medieval site, then are you telling me it has already been surveyed and determined to be of no value? Is that your opinion or someone else's, Byrd?
This has become a quest for cleansing on my part. Not so much the "bitter" taste of finding out its not a pyramid...just that I have not been given anything but links to show how crazy the man is. It helps to know more of the scientific basis behind the site before actually dropping the issue in my mind, I guess.
At this point, I'm really disgusted by the whole thing. Such a waste.
Thanks for offering your expertise, Byrd.
Originally posted by Marduk
you put your left leg in
your left leg out
you do the hokey cokey and you turn about
Originally posted by Marduk
Osmaganic is the only clown involved in this
well apart from anyone else taking it seriously
are you talking about Barney
what do you mean man in a suit
Barneys real I tell ya
look here he is with a real person to prove it
man in a suit indeed
I've heard some silly claims in my time but that takles the biscuit
Originally posted by Marduk
hmmm
are you usually at the Kids table then ?
Originally posted by Dr. No
Originally posted by Marduk
hmmm
are you usually at the Kids table then ?
1 liner, this should be banned!
Regardless of his/her colour and citizenship.
RULES is RULES! Do you dare to keep the rules, or do you KNOW HOW TO KEEP THE RULES?
Originally posted by Byrd
He feels that anyone can do archaeology by showing up with backhoes and shovels and a permit or two.
Wasn't a lot of great archeology done like that before the 20th century? You shouldn't discount him just because he is an amateur working outside the mainstream framework. A lot of ground-breaking work has been done by independent 'amateurs'. We need amateurs to think outside the box. Experience has shown that 'experts' often interpret new evidence depending on how it fits within theories they have spent careers developing (see the 'Pluto Underground' and the controversies surrounding Red Shift, oh, and the Ptolemaic system).