Musk calls on King Charles III to dissolve Parliament over Oldham sex grooming gangs

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

"I get that you want these grooming gangs to continue to flourish and expand. But it's a bad look for America to have these things happening under scum like Biden/Harris, and it's a bad look for the UK."

Where the Hell do you "get " that from?

From you acting like your country is just fine with your leaders assisting child trafficking by ignoring grooming gangs. You keep defending the UK as not needing any help from anyone (especially Trump) only because you hate Trump, at the expense of continuing child trafficking in the UK, so that makes you just as guilty.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

Are you that blinded by the propaganda?

Like I said, I have no beef with Trump.....he's your elected leader and that's entirely up to you guys.
He'll be judged on his results and if he delivers on his promises and only time will tell on that.

But I think he's in for a really big rude awakening if he thinks he can go around bullying and intimidating everyone. The world is changing and if Trump isn't careful he'll alienate the USA from the rest of the world.....Isolationism isn't all its cracked up to be, it certainly hasn't worked for the USA in the past.

Anyway, good luck.

Enough of Trump.....any chance of getting back on track?

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

What? How many times have I said that our Government is rubbish and that Starmer is useless?

I am guilty of "child trafficking"?!!

Get a grip.

I'd love you to say that to my face.

Sorry, but you are just disgusting.

a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

We don't need any help from Trump, or anyone.

What we need is our own politicians, law makers and law enforcement to do the jobs they are supposed to do.
And if they don't then it is up to us, the British electorate and citizens, to make sure they do.

We don't need Trump to do that......why the # would we?
Besides, I suspect he'll have his hands full sorting his own # out.

Some of you guys seem to think Trump is omnipotent and will cure all the worlds ills.

ETA.
How did I do that? Replied to myself - corrected.

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: cherokeetroy

At least there is hope with the incoming Trump team!

With the current admin and rogue crew galleries that are currently active, there isn't a lot of hope. Child trafficking and drugs and crime will escalate even more.

The current administration is criminal but if it's hope you need, I would appeal to a higher source. I'd be willing to wager Trump is going to be a major letdown. The writing is already on the wall.

Please stay on topic.


Trump, Biden and Harris are NOT the topic, BTW.......

Important if Actively Posting







Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (Redux)

Community Announcement re: Decorum




These rules apply to all threads and if you want to engage in personal attacks there are other sites on the Internet where you can do that. Our goal is for ATS to be above that. For members here to post like mature adults.


To repeat, those who refuse to "get it" WILL face LENGTHY POSTING BANS!!
YOU are responsible for your own posts





And, as always...
Do not reply to this post.

edit on Fri Jan 3 2025 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
From you acting like your country is just fine with your leaders assisting child trafficking by ignoring grooming gangs. You keep defending the UK as not needing any help from anyone (especially Trump) only because you hate Trump, at the expense of continuing child trafficking in the UK, so that makes you just as guilty.

Gosh darn it, well i guess we are as guilty as you then, seems a silly argument to label citizens of a country guilty of an act they have nothing to do with, but hey its your opinion so it must be that you are just as guilty...

child_sex_trafficking_in_the_united_states


if i dont vote for any idiot in a suit (some people call them politicians)to sit in number 10 or the whitehouse, am i exonerated your honor?

as for musk and his opinions he can shove them up his or trumps ass, which ever is nearest to him

Where are we with any of kekius maximus previous predicitions , you know the thing he gets multi million pound funding from the government from....just like gates, fauci etc? but musk is good at the moment as he says trump is good

robo taxis anyone, hyperloop, mars anyone, private citiznes to the moon...fry, fry bueller

Great idea Mr. Musk.

My "Friend" has been following this train wreck of the starburst Labour mob, particularly on yootoob GBNews, with the destruction of England and the UK as a whole...hole?

According to information my "Friend" has cleened, only 31% of the votes were won by Labour, and apparently less than 50% of the voting pubic actually turned out to vote...or something like that.....so this current Party in Government has a Very Very minor voting approval...but of course gamed the system to get more seats.

On several of these GBNews segments, my "Friend" suggested that the people/citizens/public protest to the Govt. by organising a partition by the people, complain to their local MP etc and present it to the King as a major protest, buyers regret as such, and the King can Dissolve the Parliament and enact a new General Election, and the people can decide at the ballot box.

This was about a month and a half ago.

Im surprised, no not really, by the general reaction of negativity by the Poms...I mean British Natives on this site.

The precedent has already been set....as England is a British Constitutional Monarcy, AND this has been done before...in the mid 1970 by Queen Elizabeth hermajestyself. In a country, far Far away, with a Constitutional Monarchy, just like the Pommy.....I mean Motherland.

Its seems Mr. Musk and his friends also watch GBNews and read the comments.

You can all thank my "Friend".

originally posted by: angelchemuel
Elon Musk has called for the King to dissolve Parliament over the government's rejection of a request by Oldham Council for an independent national inquiry into the despicable grooming gangs, which by all accounts continue to this day.
The last King to do that, against the sitting Government, was King Charles I. He actually did it 3 times between 1625 and 1629. It didn't end well. It led to Civil War and ultimately his execution and a considerable change in the Law to a Monarch's role in 'ruling' the country. It doesn't mean King Charles III can't though.
The last King that did this under 'advice' from the then sitting PM (Lord Grey) was King William IV in 1831 (against William's 'better judgement').
Since 1629, the Monarch has never dissolved Parliament (unless called to do so as in the case of Grey/William) on his own whim. It has always been Parliamentary 'protocol' to dissolve Government when they call a GE and the sitting Monarch gives ascent to do so.
Sadly, it would appear the current King Charle's is more in lockstep with the current Government than his loyalty to his subjects.
ITV news link
Rainbows
Jane

Is this related to your thread?

"BREAKING: Elon Musk calls for new UK elections after evidence of migrant gangs systematically raping young girls surfaces. He says PM Starmer was complicit in a cover-up during his time as a prosecutor and should face criminal charges."

Source: truthsocial.com...@Electionwiz/113764386499539094

I think Elon's access to Twitter traffic enables him to see communications that senders/receivers think are private?

a reply to: WeMustCare

Yes, indeed it is. Things have ramped up a bit this morning, not just by Musk either.
I'm not long awake and just catching up, but the 'sleepy, having my morning brew, me' says this.
Musk is pointing a finger, and quite rightly so, at Starmer and his time as head at the CPS. This would also bring up Saville, no doubt.
I can see why Musk is doing this because Starmer is wholly entrenched at Davos/WEF and not somebody neither Musk, nor by default Trump, can or even want to do business with. It's as though they want to 'clear the decks' of any dubious character, that the US, again by default, that they would be associated with for future business/trade/defence etc deals.
Have a look at this video. I've noted the date in my diary......

Here's a really good (albeit 36 minutes long) interview with Douglas Murray, look him up.

As to Tommy Robinson....

His own sister was raped by a 'foreigner' when she was 16 and Tommy was a teenager himself. That's what kicked off his stance. Here are Jordan Peterson and Douglas Murray on Tommy Robinson. It's well worth watching Jordan Peterson's interview with Tommy Robinson, it opened my eyes and explained a lot.

Time for my coffe now.... I'll come back with a clearer head...
Rainbows
Jane

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: charlest2

The ongoing flood of illegal immigrants, the hugely disproportionate influence Islam has in this country and the gradual erosion of some civil liberties are certainly causes for grave concern and they need addressing as a matter of utmost urgency......but we're hardly being 'defeated'.

85% of this country is white - not that being non-White is an issue with the vast majority of us.
Only just under 7% are Muslim.

Don't ever, ever under-estimate the people of these great Islands.

Are you sure about those stats??

If there are only 7% Muslim population, how can the number 1 baby name be More ham ed?

a reply to: WeMustCare

Can't use the link but it's the same/similar quote from the OP - Starmer was director of prosecutions from 2008 - 2013 though, long before Musk took over Twitter and it would be highly illegal and impractical for any of the cases to have been discussed on twitter via PM if that is what you're implying?

Starmer brought in the first prosecutions of the grooming gangs in 2013 after introducing justice reforms so the victims were no longer blamed and ignored and perpetrators ethnicity would no longer protect them as local authorities were more interested in being 'politically correct' than preventing kids getting raped and drugged for years.

There's already been inquiries into Oldham and the most recent national inquiry on the issue was in 2022 link so far better applying the recomendations of those inquiries and jailiing the scumbags grooming kids and preventing it occuring in the first place than wasting resources on yet more inquiries and distracting from blaming the groomers.

a reply to: xWorldxGonexMadx

National census figures from 2021 indicate 46.2% of the population in England and Wales are Christian.

6.5% identify as Muslim.

1.7% percent as Hindu.

0.9% as Sikh

0.5% as Jewish

And 0.5% as Buddhist.

(In Scotland that equates to around 1.4% of the population being Muslim).

As to the number one baby name being Muhammad, well i dont really think you are going to see many Christians name their baby Muhammad anymore than Muslim people would call their sons Jesus.

And point of fact before it was allegedly Muhammad, it was Noah so...................

a reply to: xWorldxGonexMadx

If there are only 7% Muslim population, how can the number 1 baby name be More ham ed?

Because that is THE most popular name for son's of Islamic parents.
All estimates indicate over 90% of male babies, born to Islamic parents in the UK, have Muhammad, or similar spelling variations as one of their registered names.

*Edit
...and they have WAY more kids than non-islamic British people do, so unchecked, it's only a few generations before 'white British' become a minority. Look at London, in only 50 years!

a reply to: xWorldxGonexMadx

First of all, when compiling the statistics they combined all the different variations of the spelling of Mohammed whereas derivatives and variations of more Anglicised names are counted separately - Mohammed and Muhammed are the same, Ollie and Oliver are different.

Secondly, a large percentage of Muslims choose to include a variation of Mohammed when naming a male child be it either the first or second given name.
Many non-Muslims seek to give their children more personalised and unusual names in order to distinguish their children. Second given names are included for Muslims but not Christians etc for some reason that I've been unable to determine.

I'm absolutely certain that Muslims only account for approximately 7% of the overall UK population.
It varies form city to city, town to town etc.
I live in a town of nearly 120,000 people, at the last census 1,849 Muslims were recorded living here.

a reply to: andy06shake

Still doesn't make sense to me...

Unless those people telling us the number 1 name among babies is Mohammed are telling us lies!

It doesn't add up.

93% of the population are not naming their children Mohammed.

a reply to: angelchemuel

Wow...that's a tremendous scandal. There's more justification for arresting Prime Minister Starmer right now, than there ever was for arresting the South Korea's President last week. Thank-you for the update. Before this thread, I had no clue who the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom was. I'll dig some more to determine if he was elected, or appointed. Thanks again, Angel.

a reply to: WeMustCare

He was elected. Sadly.

Arrest him, for what?

Here are some of the horrifying details, the cover up was horrible, too:

www.telegraph.co.uk...

a reply to: xWorldxGonexMadx

Unless those people telling us the number 1 name among babies is Mohammed are telling us lies!

Bingo methinks.

Now if they had said the number one boy baby name in Muslim households.

That would be nothing new on that score.

Just about every Muslim boy I was at school with had Mohammed in their name or his brother was called Mohammed.

It's not supposed to make sense xWorldxGonexMadx, it's supposed to infuriate people silly enough to lap it up.

Hence the reason it does not add up.